Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Trip Rates and Accessibility: Gleaning Basic Planning Information from Activity-Based Travel Demand Model

Abstract

Planners have developed an appetite for complex and multifarious models to match the intricacy of the questions being asked. For the most part, these new models, such as the currently popular activity-based modeling framework, are seamlessly backward compatible with all the previous questions that planners still ask from time to time. However, a seemingly simple question was recently raised in San Francisco, California, and the San Francisco County Transportation Authority's advanced, state-of-the-art activity-based model SF-CHAMP (San Francisco Chained Activity Modeling Process) was not equipped to handle it gracefully. This paper documents a methodology used to create a schedule of the auto trip rates from the SF-CHAMP activity-based travel demand model. The linear regression methodology uses outputs from the SF-CHAMP model along with simple accessibility variables to account for the wide variations in vehicle trip rates across the city and to provide a nexus between trip generation rates and the context of their origins or destinations. This approach combines the desired simplicity of auto trip generation rates in the local context of San Francisco and sensitivity to a set of accessibility variables comprehensible to humans.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Special Report 288: Metropolitan Travel Forecasting: Current Practice and Future Direction. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.
2. McNally M., and Rindt C. The Activity-Based Approach. Technical Report UCI-ITS-AS-WP-00-4. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.
3. Automobile Trips Generated: CEQA Impact Measure and Mitigation Program. Final report. San Francisco County Transportation Authority, Calif., 2008.
4. Joh K., Boarnet M.G., Nguyen M.T., Fulton W., Siembab W., and Weaver S. Accessibility, Travel Behavior, and New Urbanism: Case Study of Mixed-Use Centers and Auto-Oriented Corridors in the South Bay Region of Los Angeles, California. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2082, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 81–89.
5. Kimley-Horn and Associates. Trip-Generation Rates for Urban Infill Land Uses in California. Final report. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2009.
6. Ewing R., Greenwald M., Zhang M., Walters J., Feldman M., Cervero R., Frank L., and Thomas J. Traffic Generated by Mixed-Use Developments: Six-Region Study Using Consistent Built Environmental Measures. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 137, No. 3, 2011, pp. 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000068. Accessed July 28, 2011.
7. Trip Generation, 8th ed. ITE, Washington, D.C., 2008.
8. Shoup D. Truth in Transportation Planning. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2003, pp. 1–16.
9. DKS Associates. Travel Model Development and Refinement: Trip Generation. Final report. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1994.
10. Kitamura R., Chen C., Pendyala R.M., and Narayanan R. Micro-Simulation of Daily Activity–Travel Patterns for Travel Demand Forecasting. Transportation, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2000, pp. 25–51.
11. DKS Associates. Final Land Use and Transport Modeling Design Report. Sacramento Area Council of Governments, Calif., 2001.
12. Parsons Brinckerhoff. Update of the San Francisco Chained Activity Modeling Process (SF-CHAMP). San Francisco County Transportation Authority, Calif., 2007.
13. Projections 2009 Forecasts. Association of Bay Area Governments, Oakland, Calif., 2009. http://www.abag.ca.gov/planning/currentfcst. Accessed July 29, 2011.
14. Draft Transit Effectiveness Project (TEP)—Implementation Strategy. San Francisco Municipal Transit Agency, Calif., 2011. http://www.sfmta.com/cms/mtep/documents/TEP%20Implementation%20Strategy%20Draft,%20April%205,%202011.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Daniel Wu
Cambridge Systematics, 555 12th Street, Suite 1600, Oakland, CA 94607.
Elizabeth Sall
San Francisco County Transportation Authority, 100 Van Ness Avenue, 26th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102.
Stephen Newhouse
Cambridge Systematics, 555 12th Street, Suite 1600, Oakland, CA 94607.
AC Transit, 1600 Franklin Street, Oakland, CA 94612.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 24

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Does better accessibility help to reduce social exclusion? Evidence fr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Is accessibility relevant in trip generation? Modelling the interactio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub