Comparison of Design Thicknesses for Flexible Airfield Pavement Based on Agency Limiting Subgrade Strain Criteria
Abstract
A newly developed mechanistically based design procedure for airfield hot-mix asphalt pavement is studied. The pavement performance is calculated in terms of critical strains on the basis of multilayer theory. Rutting failure criteria from the Asphalt Institute, Shell Oil, and the revised U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (USACE-WES) are used to calculate the thickness requirements necessary for a range of design input variables. The program has been implemented in ZAPRAM, an event-driven, user-friendly educational computer program that runs in the Excel 2007 environment, coupled with Visual Basic programming. Results of the design comparison indicate a significant difference between the three common airfield pavement design procedures used. Differences between the Asphalt Institute procedure and the revised USACE-WES procedure are relatively moderate for all design situations. The greatest deviation is found between the Shell Oil approach and the other two criteria. The design difference depends heavily on several major factors. An analysis of heavy aircraft (B-747) operating on a low-support subgrade foundation may yield pavement design differences of 2 to 3 ft of granular subbase material. A major effort to enhance the state of the art for airfield pavement design models is recommended.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Odemark N. Undersökning av Elsticitetegenskaperna hos Olika Jordarter Smat Teori för Beräkning av Belägningar Enligt Elasticitsteorin. Meddelande 77. Statens Väginstitut, Stockholm, Sweden, 1949.
2. Boussinesq J. Application des Potentiels à l'Etude de l'Equilibre et du Mouvement des Solides Elastiques. Gauthiers Villars, Paris, France, 1985.
3. Witczak M. W., Design of Full-Depth Asphalt Airfield Pavements. Proc., 3rd International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, London, Vol. 1, September 1972.
4. Edwards J.M., and Valkering C.P. Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements for Heavy Aircraft. Shell Construction Service, London, 1971.
5. Barker W., and Gonzalez C. Renovation of the CBR Design Procedure. Report 1. Understanding, Scrutinizing and Revamping the CBR Thickness Design Methodology. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., May 2006.
6. Barker W., and Gonzalez C. Renovation of the CBR Design Procedure. Proc., 2nd International Airports Conference: Planning Infrastructure and Environment, São Paulo, Brazil, August 2006.
7. Witczak M.W., and Zapata C.E. Models Incorporated into the Current Enhanced Integrated Climatic Model. NCHRP 1–40D final report. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tempe, Arizona State University, December 2006.
8. Cary C.E., and Zapata C.E. Enhanced Model for Resilient Response of Soils Resulting from Seasonal Changes as Implemented in Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2170, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 36–44.
9. Som N.N., and Das S.C. Theory and Practice of Foundation Design. Prentice-Hall, New Delhi, India, 2004.
10. Yoder E.J., and Witczak M.W. Principles of Pavement Design, 2nd ed. John Wiley, New York, 1975.
11. Design of Full Depth Asphalt Airfield Pavements. Manual series no. 11 (MS-11). The Asphalt Institute, College Park, Md., 1972.
12. Flexible Pavement Design for Airfields (Elastic Layer Method). In Department of the Army and the Air Force Technical Manual. Army TM 5-825-2-1 and Air Force AFM 88-6. Washington, D.C., November 1989, pp. 2-1–2-10.
13. Zapata C.E., and Salim R.A. Impact of Environmental Site Location and Groundwater Table Depth on the Thickness of Flexible Airfield Pavements. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2282, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 22–31.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 25
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 2
- Prediction of Flexible Pavement’s Unbound Granular Materials Using Ela...
- Unsaturated Soil Modeling for Airfield Pavement Design
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
