Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

To Game or Not to Game: Teaching Transportation Planning with Board Games

Abstract

Traditional “chalk and talk” teaching in civil engineering is gradually being replaced with active learning that focuses on encouraging students to discover knowledge with innovative pedagogical methods and tools. One interesting such tool is the board game. This research examines the efficacy of adopting transportation board games as a tool in graduate-level transportation planning and transportation economics classes at the University of Minnesota from 2008 to 2011. The Department of Civil Engineering offered these courses with transportation board games on weekday nights. Students were asked to evaluate the effects of the games on their learning and to write self-reflective essays about their findings. The postgame survey revealed that the students’ understanding of the planning process, network deployment, and practical issues, and their ability to form opinions about transportation planning had improved. Student essays on the game economy and its implications on planning further validated that the learning outcomes derived from this game process met the pedagogical goals. This analysis shows that students who are oriented toward learning more on the basis of the visual, sensing, active, or sequential learning styles, with all else being equal, tend to learn more effectively through this approach than those who do not share these learning styles. Overall, this research suggests that properly incorporating board games into the curriculum can enhance students’ learning in transportation planning.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Felder R., and Silverman L., Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education, Vol. 78, No. 7, 1988, pp. 674–681.
2. Mills J., Treagust D. Engineering Education: Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 3, 2003, pp. 2–16.
3. Gredler M. Educational Games and Simulations: A Technology in Search of a (Research) Paradigm. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, Vol. 1, 1996, pp. 521–540.
4. Dale E. Audiovisual Methods in Teaching. Thomson Publishing, New York, 1969.
5. Prince M. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, 2004, pp. 223–232.
6. Abt C. Serious Games. University Press of America, Lanham, Md., 1987.
7. Chen W., and Levinson D. Effectiveness of Learning Transportation Network Growth Through Simulation. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 132, 2006, p. 29.
8. Liao C.-F., Liu H.X., and Levinson D.M. Simulating Transportation for Realistic Engineering Education and Training: Engaging Undergraduate Students in Transportation Studies. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2109, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 12–21.
9. Zhu S., Xie F., and Levinson D., Enhancing Transportation Education Through Online Simulation Using an Agent-Based Demand and Assignment Model. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 137, 2011, pp. 38–4.
10. Liao C., Glick D., Haag S., and Baas G., Development and Deployment of Traffic Control Game: Integration with Traffic Engineering Curriculum for Teaching High School Students. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2199, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 28–36.
11. Ebner M., and Holzinger A., Successful Implementation of User-Centered Game Based Learning in Higher Education: An Example from Civil Engineering. Computers and Education: An International Journal, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2007, pp. 873–890.
12. Kyte M., Dixon M., Abdel-Rahim A., and Brown S. Process for Improving Design of Transportation Curriculum Materials with Examples. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2199, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 18–27.
13. Gaudart H., Epistemic Games. Journal of Online Education, Vol. 1, No. 6, 2005.
14. Whitehill B., and McDonald B. Improving Learning Persistence of Military Personnel by Enhancing Motivation in a Technical Training Program. Simulation and Gaming, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1993, p. 294.
15. Ricci K.E., Salas E., and Cannon-Bowers J. Do Computer-Based Games Facilitate Knowledge Acquisition and Retention? Military Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1996, pp. 295–307.
16. Pierfy D. Comparative Simulation Game Research: Stumbling Blocks and Steppingstones. Simulation and Games, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1977, pp. 255–268.
17. Jung C. Psychological Types: A Revision by R. F. C. Hull of the Translation by H. G. Baynes. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1971.
18. Levinson D., and Yerra B. Self-Organization of Surface Transportation Networks. Transportation Science, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2006, pp. 179–188.
19. Xie F., and Levinson D. Evolving Transportation Networks. Springer, New York, 2001.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Arthur Huang
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 500 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
David Levinson
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 500 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 214

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 16

  1. Developing a Gameful Approach as a Tool for Innovation and Teaching Qu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Teaching human geography using a couplet game
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Primary school teachers’ attitude to board-games and their board-game ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Competition in Monopoly
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Mastery-Level Achievement Method for Assessing Module-Based Educationa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Adapting the DIPLOMACY Board Game Concept for 21st Century Internation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Assessment of Students’ Mastery of Construction Management and Enginee...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Assessment of Students’ Preconceptions in an Introductory Transportati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. A study on the effectiveness of task manager board game as a training ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Transportation Modeling as a Didactic Tool...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Using Game Engines for Designing Traffic Control Educational Games
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Inverted Classroom and Its Influence on Students' Attitudes across Lea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Multiagent Route Choice Game for Transportation Engineering
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Simopoly
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Strategies for Teaching Travel Time Uncertainty Modeling
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Game-based Learning for Systems Engineering Concepts
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub