Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Real-World Performance of Longitudinal Barriers Struck by Large Trucks

Abstract

Very little is known about the real-world performance of traffic barriers when subjected to impacts by large trucks. This study investigated real-world impacts of large trucks into traffic barriers to determine barrier crash involvement rates, the impact performance of barriers not specifically designed to redirect large trucks, and the real-world performance of barriers specifically designed for large trucks. Data sources included the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (2000 to 2009), the General Estimates System (2000 to 2009), and the Large Truck Crash Causation Study (155 in-depth crashes of large trucks into barriers). Impacts of large trucks into longitudinal barriers constituted 3% of all police-reported impacts into longitudinal barriers and roughly the same proportion of barrier fatalities. A logistic regression model predicting barrier penetration showed that the risk of a large truck penetrating a barrier increased by a factor of 6 for impacts with barriers designed primarily for passenger vehicles. Although barriers specifically designed for impacts by large trucks performed better than barriers not specifically designed for impacts by heavy vehicles, the penetration rate of the former was 17%. This penetration rate is of concern, because barriers used for higher test levels are designed to protect other road users, not the occupants of large trucks. Barriers not specifically designed for impacts by large trucks prevented penetration by a large truck approximately half the time. This finding suggests that adding costlier barriers that meet higher test levels may not always be warranted, especially on roadways with lower truck volumes.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Cerelli E. C. Trends in Large Truck Crashes. NHTSA Technical Report DOT-HS 808 690. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Springfield, Va., 1998.
2. Ross H.E. Jr., Sicking D.L. Zimmer R. A., and Michie J.D. NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.
3. Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2009.
4. Nicol D. A. Information: Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware. Memorandum. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, November 20, 2009.
5. Road Restraint Systems—Part 2: Performance Classes, Impact Test Acceptance Criteria and Test Methods for Safety Barriers Including Vehicle Parapets. European Standard EN 1317-2. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
6. Horne D. A. Information: NCHRP Report 350 Nonproprietary Guardrails and Median Barriers. Memorandum HMHS-B64. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, February 14, 2000.
7. Ray M.H., and McGinnis R.G. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 244: Guardrail and Median Barrier Crashworthiness. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997.
8. Buth C.E., and Menges W.L. NCHRP Report 350 Test 4–12 of the Modified Thrie Beam Guardrail. Report FHWA-RD-99-065. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1999.
9. Buth C.E., Hirsch T. J., and McDevitt C. F. Performance Level 2 Bridge Railings. In Transportation Research Record 1258, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 32–50.
10. Mak K.K., Gripne D. J., and McDevitt C. F. Single Slope Concrete Bridge Rail. In Transportation Research Record 1468, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 25–33.
11. Baxter J. R. Brifen WRSF @ TL-4. Acceptance Letter B-82B. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, March 27, 2005.
12. Rice G. E. TL-4 Four Cable Tensioned Barrier. Acceptance Letter B-88E. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, July 31, 2007.
13. Baxter J. R. Four-Cable Barrier @ TL-4. Acceptance Letter B-137A1. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, October 27, 2006.
14. Baxter J. R. CASS TL-4 Cable Barrier System and Terminal. Acceptance Letter B-157. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, April 23, 2007.
15. Nicol D. A. Four-Cable Nucor Wire Rope Barrier System TL-4. Acceptance Letter B-167. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, January 24, 2008.
16. Alberson D.C., Zimmer R. A., and Menges W. L. NCHRP Report 350 Compliance Test 5–12 of the 1.07-m Vertical Wall Bridge Railing. FHWA-RD-96-199. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997.
17. Buth C.E., Campise W. L., Griffith L.I., Lowe M.L., and Sicking D.L. Performance Limits of Longitudinal Barriers. FHWA-RD-86-154. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1986.
18. Mak K.K., and Campise W.L. Test and Evaluation of Ontario “Tall Wall” Barrier with an 80,000-Pound Tractor-Trailer. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1990.
19. Lechtenberg K.A., Bielenberg R., Rosenbaugh S. K., Faller R.K., and Sicking D.L. High-Performance Aesthetic Bridge Rail and Median Barrier. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2120, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 60–73.
20. Baxter J. R. Steel Roadside Barrier @ TL-5 (Max-Rail). Acceptance Letter B-142. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, January 12, 2006.
21. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (5th Edition) with 2010 Interim Revisions. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2010.
22. Ivey D.L., McDevitt C. F., Robertson R., Buth C. E., and Stocker A. J. Thrie-Beam Guardrails for School and Intercity Buses. In Transportation Research Record 868, TRB, National Research Council, 1982, pp. 38–44.
23. Hirsch T. J. Longitudinal Barriers for Buses and Trucks. In Transportation Research Record 1052, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 95–102.
24. Cansiz O.F., and Atahan A.O. Crash Test Simulation of a Modified Thrie-Beam High Containment Level Guardrail Under NCHRP Report 350 TL 4–12 Conditions. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2006, pp. 2–18.
25. Borovinsek M., Vesenjak M., Ulbin M., and Ren Z. Simulation of Crash Tests for High Containment Levels of Road Safety Barriers. Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 14, 2007, pp. 1711–1718.
26. Montella A., and Pernetti M. Heavy-Goods Vehicle Collisions with Steel Road Safety Barriers: Combined Influences of Position of Center of Mass and Tire–Pavement Friction. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1690, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 84–94.
27. Mak K.K., and Sicking D.L. Analysis of Bridge Railing Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 1468, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1994, pp. 19–24.
28. Jackson L. E. Truck Accident Studies. In Transportation Research Record 1052, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 137–145.
29. Michie J. D. Large Vehicles and Roadside Safety Considerations. In Transportation Research Record 1052, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 90–95.
30. Wiles E.O., Bronstad M. E., and Kimball C. E. Evaluation of Concrete Safety Shapes by Crash Tests with Heavy Vehicles. In Transportation Research Record 631, TRB, National Research Council, 1977, pp. 87–91.
31. Ray M.H., and Bryden J.E. Summary Report on Selected Guardrails. Report No. FHWA-SA-91-050. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1992.
32. Sposito B., and Johnston S. Three-Cable Median Barrier. Report OR-RD-99-03. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 1998.
33. Martin J.-L., and Quincy R. Crossover Crashes at Median Strips Equipped with Barriers on a French Motorway Network. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1758, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 6–12.
34. Seamons L.L., and Smith R.N. Past and Current Median Barrier Practice in California. Report CALTRANS-TE-90-2. California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 1991.
35. National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) General Estimates System (GES): Analytical User's Manual 1988–2009. DOT HS 811 355. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
36. FARS Analytical Reference Guide 1975 to 2009. DOT HS 811 352. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
37. Highway Statistics Summary to 1995. Office of Highway Information Management, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997.
38. Highway Statistics Series. Office of Highway Information Management, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996–2009.
39. Large Truck Crash Causation Study Analytical User's Manual. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
40. Gabauer D.J., and Gabler H.C. Differential Rollover Risk in Vehicle-to-Traffic Barrier Collisions. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, Vol. 53, 2009, pp. 131–140.
41. Gabauer D. J. Secondary Collisions Following a Traffic Barrier Impact: Frequency, Factors, and Occupant Risk. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, Vol. 54, 2010, pp. 223–232.
42. AASHTO Roadside Design Guide, Third Edition. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2002.
43. Blower D., and Green P. E. Truck Mechanical Condition and Crashes in the Large Truck Crash Causation Study. UMTRI-2009-09. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Douglas J. Gabauer
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA 17837.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 22

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Barrier dynamics for GIS: a design pattern for geospatial barriers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Exploring the Nature and Severity of Heavy Truck Crashes in Abu Dhabi,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub