Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Simulator Study of Driver Responses to Pedestrian Treatments at Multilane Roundabouts

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that roundabouts, especially multilane roundabouts, pose accessibility challenges to pedestrians with vision impairments, in part because of a lack of yielding by drivers, especially on multilane roundabout exit legs. In this study, a driving simulator was used to assess three different treatments in regard to their propensity for increasing the driver yielding rate. These treatments were the relocation of the stop bar and crosswalk away from the beginning of the exit leg and two types of beacons, namely a pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB) and a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB). The study showed that the installation of any kind of beacon (PHB or RRFB), with or without crosswalk relocation, increased driver yielding rates significantly. Relocating the crosswalk did not provide a significant increase in the driver yielding rate for the base case, but appeared to enhance further the effectiveness of the PHB and RRFB treatments. The results of using an eye tracker on drivers to track their gaze pattern while exiting the roundabout showed that having a beacon installed with crosswalk relocation increased drivers’ attention on the beacon and on the pedestrian along the road. However, some of the participants failed to see and react to the pedestrian treatments and thus caused concern about the visibility of these treatments at the roundabout exit leg.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. U.S. Access Board. Revised Draft Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way. http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/draft.htm. 2006. Accessed July 1, 2010.
2. Ashmead D., Guth D., Wall R., Long R., and Ponchillia P. Street Crossing by Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at a Modern Roundabout. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 11, Nov. 1, 2005, pp. 812–821.
3. Guth D., Ashmead D., Long R., and Ponchillia P. Blind and Sighted Pedestrians’ Judgments of Gaps in Traffic at Roundabouts. Human Factors, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2005, pp. 314–342.
4. Institute of Transportation Research and Education. NCHRP Report 674: Crossing Solutions at Roundabouts and Channelized Turn Lanes for Pedestrians with Vision Disabilities. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.
5. Access Board Research. Pedestrian Access to Modern Roundabouts: Design and Operational Issues for Pedestrians Who Are Blind. http://www.access-board.gov/research/roundabouts/bulletin.htm. Accessed May 5, 2011.
6. Geruschat D.R., and Hassan S.E. Driver Behavior in Yielding to Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at Roundabouts. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, Vol. 99, No. 5, 2005, pp. 286–312.
7. Texas Transportation Institute. NCHRP Report 562: Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006.
8. Rodegerdts L., Bansen J., Tiesler C., Knudsen J., Myers E., Johnson M., Moule M., Persaud B., Lyon C., Hallmark S., Isebrands H., Crown R.B., Guichet B., and O'Brien A. NCHRP Report 672: Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, 2nd ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
9. U.S. Access Board. Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Rights of Way. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Released July 26, 2011. http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/nprm.htm. Accessed July 27, 2011.
10. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009. http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/kno_2009.htm. Accessed June 1, 2011.
11. Fitzpatrick K., Chrysler S. T., Van Houten R., Hunter W. W., and Turner S. Evaluation of Pedestrian and Bicycle Engineering Countermeasures: Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons, HAWKs, Sharrows, Crosswalk Markings, and the Development of an Evaluation Methods Report. Report No. FHWA-HRT-11-039. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011.
12. Fitzpatrick K., and Park E.S. Safety Effectiveness of the HAWK Pedestrian Crossing Treatment. Report No. FHWA-HRT-10-042. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
13. Hunter W., Srinivasan R., and Martel C.A. Evaluation of the Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon at a Pinellas Trail Crossing in St. Petersburg, Florida. Final report. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2009.
14. Shurbutt J., and Van Houten R. Effects of Yellow Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons on Yielding at Multilane Uncontrolled Crosswalks. Report No. FHWA-HRT-10-043. Final report. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
15. Shurbutt J., and Van Houten R. TechBrief: Effects of Yellow Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons on Yielding at Multilane Uncontrolled Crosswalks. Report No. FHWA-HRT-10-046. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
16. Ergonomics Lab, North Carolina State University. http://www.ise.ncsu.edu/ergolab/equipments/. Accessed May 11, 2011.
17. Zhang Y., and Kaber D. An Empirical Assessment of Driver Motivation, Emotional Response and Driving Conditions on Risk-Taking Decisions. Presented at 3rd International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Miami, Fla., July 2010.
18. Montgomery D. C. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 6th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N.J., 2005.
19. Rodegerdts L., Blogg M., Wemple E., Myers E., Kyte M., Dixon M., List G., Flannery A., Troutbeck R., Brilon W., Wu N., Persaud B., Lyon C., Harkey D., and Carter D. NCHRP Report 572: Roundabouts in the United States. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.
20. Fleiss J.L., Tytun A., and Ury H.K. A Simple Approximation for Calculating Sample Sizes for Comparing Independent Proportions. Biometrics, Vol. 34, 1980, pp. 343–346.
21. Duchowski A. T. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag London Limited, London, 2007.
22. Schroeder B.J., Rouphail N. M., and Hughes R. G. Toward Roundabout Accessibility—Exploring the Operational Impact of Pedestrian Signalization Options at Modern Roundabouts. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 6, 2008, pp. 262–271.
23. Geruschat D.R., Hassan S. E., and Turano K. A. Gaze Behavior While Crossing Complex Intersections. Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 80, No. 7, 2003, pp. 515–528.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Katayoun Salamati
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, NCSU Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.
Bastian Schroeder
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, NCSU Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.
Nagui M. Rouphail
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, NCSU Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.
Christopher Cunningham
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, NCSU Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.
Yu Zhang
Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, 448 Daniels Hall, Raleigh, NC 27695-7906.
David Kaber
Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, 448 Daniels Hall, Raleigh, NC 27695-7906.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 106

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 14

  1. Estimating effectiveness of speed reduction measures for pedestrian cr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Differences in the Assessment of Safe and Risky Driving Behaviors: Ped...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Data-Driven Scenario Specification for AV–VRU Interactions at Urban Ro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. What Affects the E-Bicycle Speed Perception in the Era of Eco-Sustaina...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Evaluating the effectiveness of new-designed crosswalk markings at int...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Evaluation of the effects of daytime running lights for passenger cars
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Influence of drivers’ psychological risk profiles on the effectiveness...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Traffic accident risk assessment with dynamic microsimulation model us...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Study of pedestrian hybrid beacon's effectiveness for motorists at mid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Driver's braking behavior approaching pedestrian crossings: a parametr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Effects of safety measures on driver's speed behavior at pedestrian cr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Multicriteria Assessment of Crosswalk Location in Urban Roundabout Cor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Pedestrian Safety Practitioners' Perspectives of Driver Yielding Behav...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Lane Choice Model for Signalized Intersections with an Auxiliary Throu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub