Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Delay Analysis of Single-Lane Roundabout with a Slip Lane under Varying Exit Types, Experimental Balanced Traffic Volumes, and Pedestrians, Using Microsimulation

Abstract

A slip lane facilitates right-turning traffic flow, reduces approach delay, and reduces conflict points within a roundabout. In this paper the delay performance of a single-lane roundabout with an adjacent slip lane is modeled with the VISSIM microsimulation tool for three slip lane exit types (free-flow, yield, and stop) and the results are compared with a roundabout having no slip lane. The VISSIM assessment considers four experimental traffic percentage turning volume distributions as balanced flow scenarios (total traffic flow into and out of every roundabout approach is the same). Simulated slip lane right-turning traffic volumes range from 50 to 500 vehicles/h, and the four pedestrian volume levels range from 0 to 100 pedestrians/h. VISSIM results confirm that average delays in a roundabout with a slip lane are a function of circulating conflict volumes and are related exponentially to slip lane volumes regardless of the slip lane exit type. Results also indicate that a free-flow slip lane exit type best reduces total average delay in the roundabout and in the slip lane itself. Yield and stop slip lane exit types also reduce the roundabout total average delay but to a lesser degree. Finally, at a higher traffic volume, a free-flow slip lane exit type can increase roundabout delay from 6.6 to 34.7 s/vehicle if drivers must yield the right-of-way to high pedestrian traffic (100 pedestrians/h) crossing a free-flow slip lane (priority rule).

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Rodegerdts L., Bansen J., Tiesler C., Knudsen J., Myers E., Johnson M., Moule M., Persaud B., Lyon C., Hallmark S., Isebrands H., Crown R.B., Guichet B., and O'Brien A. NCHRP Report 672: Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, 2nd ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
2. Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. Publication Number FHWA-RD-00-06. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2000.
3. Rodegerdts L., Blogg M., Wemple E., Myers E., Kyte M., Dixon M., List G., Flannery A., Troutbeck R., Brilon W., Wu N., Persaud B., Lyon C., Harkey D., and Carter D. NCHRP Report 572: Roundabouts in the United States. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.
4. Bared J.G., and Edara P.K. Simulated Capacity of Roundabouts and Impact of Roundabout within a Progressed Signalized Road. In Transportation Research Circular E-C083: National Roundabout Conference: 2005 Proceedings, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2005.
5. PTV VISSIM User's Manual 5.0. Planung Transport Verkehr AG, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany, Sept. 2007.
6. Bared J.G., and Afshar A.M. Using Simulation to Plan Capacity Models by Lane for Two- and Three-Lane Roundabouts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2096, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 8–15.
7. Trueblood M., and Dale J. Simulation Roundabouts with VISSIM. Presented at 2nd Urban Street Symposium, Anaheim, Calif., July 28–30, 2003.
8. Vaiana R., Gallelli V., and Capiluppi G. Roundabout Intersections: Analysis for Scenarios by Micro-Simulation. Proc., 4th International SIIV Congress—Advances in Transport Infrastructures and Stakeholder Expectations. 2007. http://www.siiv.it. Accessed Oct. 1, 2010.
9. Al-Ghandour M. Roundabout Slip Lanes: Performance and Safety Analysis. PhD dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 2011.
10. DLZ Consultants. Traffic Congestion and Safety Study Final Report. City of Carmel, Ind., 2009.
11. SIDRA INTERSECTION (5.1). Akçelik and Associates Pty Ltd., Greythorn, Victoria, Australia. http://www.sidrasolutions.com/Portals/0/Datasheet_SIDRA_INTERSECTION_5.1.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Majed Al-Ghandour
Program Development Branch, North Carolina Department of Transportation, 1534 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1534.
Bastian Schroeder
Highway Systems Group, Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.
William Rasdorf
Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27606-7908.
Billy Williams
Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7908, Raleigh, NC 27606-7908.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 29

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 7

  1. Vehicle crash simulations for safety: Introduction of connected and au...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Reduction in Entry Capacity of Roundabout under the Influence of Pedes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The Warrant of Slip Lane at Single-Lane Roundabout
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A model for evaluating the environmental and functional benefits of “i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Improving the Sustainability of Transportation: Environmental and Fun...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. General Criteria for Calculating the Capacities of Alternative Types o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Environmental, functional and economic criteria for comparing “target ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub