Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Concrete Roadside Barrier Anchorage Details for 5-in., Cast-in-Place Decks on Prestressed Beams

Abstract

The Texas Department of Transportation commonly builds bridge spans with adjacently framed, prestressed box beams and slab beams and makes them composite with a 5-in.-thick, concrete, cast-in-place deck (CIPD). The presence of a cast-in-place, concrete overlay allows use of more favorable empirical, live-load distribution equations, which results in more efficient bridge spans. This 5-in.-thick CIPD offers limited depth for anchorage of rail reinforcement. AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design Bridge Design Specifications has a limiting hook development length of 6 in. for a No. 4 rail anchorage. With a 5-in. deck thickness and a 6-in. minimum required development length, the rail anchorage reinforcement must be cast in the pretensioned beams to meet specification requirements for rail anchorage strength. This need has made it difficult to ensure adequate development of the rail anchorage reinforcement. The objective of the study reported here, therefore, was to develop barrier anchorage details that would meet the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) evaluation criteria, minimize damage to the concrete barrier profile and CIPD, and prevent delamination of the CIPD from the precast beams, which was witnessed in a research project performed at Texas Transportation Institute. The anchorage modifications were evaluated successfully under the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Test 3–11 and were considered suitable for roadways with traffic conditions appropriate for Testing Level 3 safety hardware.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2009.
2. Arrington D.R., Bligh R. P., and Menges W. L. Bogie Testing of Shallow Embedded Anchors. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2010.
3. Buth C.E., Williams W. F., Bligh R.P., Menges W.L., and Haug R.R. Performance of the TxDOT T202 (MOD) Bridge Rail Reinforced with Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2002.
4. Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. NCHRP, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1993.
5. Bligh R.P., Arrington D. R., Sheikh N.M., Silvestri C., and Menges W.L. Development of MASH TL-3 Median Barrier Gate. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2011.
6. Arrington D.R., Bligh R. P., and Menges W. L. MASH Test 3–11 on the 5-inch CIP Barrier Anchors. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dusty R. Arrington
Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-3135.
John M. Holt
Texas Department of Transportation, Bridge Division, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, TX 78701-2483.
Roger P. Bligh
Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-3135.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 7

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub