Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Technical Details for Integrating Safety and Planning at Level of Individual: Regional Case Study

Abstract

The need for strengthening the connection between transportation safety and planning has been well documented, and guides have been developed to encourage this integration. When a central Virginia region expressed an interest in performing such integration, beginning with an analysis of existing crashes, an opportunity arose to implement one such guide. This opportunity led to the identification of key details that a transportation planning professional, with the goal of integrating safety and planning, must resolve. Details include the threshold distance that defines a crash cluster, the manner in which disparate geographic systems are used to locate crashes, selection of performance measures to support community programs, and examination of individual crash reports to identify potential countermeasures. The commonality of these details is that they are not ends unto themselves but rather that they support larger objectives associated with integration of safety planning. This paper discusses resolution of such details through a search for a solution that is not necessarily optimal but minimizes computational effort, training needs, and staff time. Because regional planning agencies and state departments of transportation have limited staff and budgets available for this endeavor and because these details may not be apparent at the outset of a process to link safety and planning, explicit consideration of these decisions may result in agencies performing analyses that otherwise would not be undertaken. Furthermore, it is possible to develop a relatively short training curriculum that is based on these concepts. Given that staff time is increasingly limited, providing just enough information to enable an individual to perform a few what-if scenarios is one way to increase incorporation of safety into the planning process elsewhere. In that sense, these findings suggest lessons for implementation of research results generally.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Washington S.P., van Schalkwyk I., Mitra S., Meyer M. D., Dumbaugh E., and Zoll M. NCHRP Report 546: Incorporating Safety into Long-Range Transportation Planning. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_546.pdf. Accessed July 26, 2011.
2. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation Planner's Safety Desk Reference. FHWA-HEP-10-001. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
3. Miller J.S., Garber N. J., and Kamatu J. N. Incorporating Safety into the Regional Planning Process in Virginia, Volume II: A Resource Guide. VTRC 10-R15. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 2010. http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/10-r15.pdf. Accessed July 26, 2011.
4. Census Block Shapefiles with 2010 Census Population and Housing Unit Counts. U.S. Census Bureau. June 15, 2011. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tgrshp2010/pophu.html. Accessed July 14, 2011.
5. Safe Routes to School Online Guide. Pedestrian Bicycle Information Center, National Center for Safe Routes to School, Chapel Hill, N.C., 2011. http://guide.saferoutesinfo.org/index.cfm. Accessed July 15, 2011.
6. Barsotti E. Bicycle Level of Service/Pedestrian Level of Service Calculator Form. League of Illinois Bicyclists, Aurora, 2004. http://www.bikelib.org/roads/blos/losform.htm. Accessed July 15, 2011.
7. Committee for a Study of Supply and Demand for Highway Safety Professionals in the Public Sector. In Special Report 289: Building the Road Safety Profession in the Public Sector. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/sr/sr289.pdf. Accessed July 18, 2011.
8. Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan 2035. Alpha 2 draft, March 30, 2009. Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. http://www.rvarc.org/work/LRTP2035draftsmall.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2011.
9. Virginia's Strategic Highway Safety Plan: 2006–2010. Virginia's Surface Transportation Safety Executive Committee, Richmond, 2007. http://www.virginiadot.org/info/resources/Strat_Hway_Safety_Plan_FREPT.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2011.
10. Wang X., Abdel-Aty M. A., Nevarez A., and Santos J.B. Investigation of Safety Influence Area for Four-Legged Signalized Intersections Nationwide Survey and Empirical Inquiry. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2083, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 86–95.
11. Miller J.S., Garber N. J., and Korukonda S. K. Causal Factors for Intersection Crashes in Northern Virginia. VTRC 10-R22. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 2010. http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/10-r22.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2011.
12. Highway Safety Manual, Vols. 1–3. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2010.
13. Scheaffer R.L., and McClave J.T. Statistics for Engineers. Duxbury Press, Boston, Mass., 1982.
14. Schneider R.J., Ryznar R. M., and Khattak A. J. An Accident Waiting to Happen: A Spatial Approach to Proactive Pedestrian Planning. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 2, March 2004, pp. 193–211.
15. Garber N.J., and Hoel L.A. Traffic and Highway Engineering, 4th ed. Cengage, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2009.
16. Shilane D., Hubbard A. E., and Evans A. N. Confidence Intervals for Negative Binomial Random Variables of High Dispersion. Working Paper 242. University of California, Berkeley, 2008.
17. McReynolds R. L. Unsuccessful Implementation Efforts: Lessons Learned. In Transportation Research Circular E-C070, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 14–18. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec070.pdf. Accessed July 18, 2011.
18. Khisty C.J., and Kikuchi S. Urban Transportation Planning Education Revisited: Reading the Dials and Steering the Ship. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1848, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 57–63.
19. Naderan A., and Shahi J. Aggregate Crash Prediction Models: Introducing Crash Generation Concept. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2010, pp. 339–346.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

John S. Miller
Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research, 530 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 11

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Development of Low-Cost Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian Safety i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub