Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Identification of Mobility-Impaired Persons and Analysis of Their Travel Behavior and Needs

Abstract

Mobility is an important prerequisite for equal participation in social life and satisfaction of basic human needs. Mobility impairments can restrict the participation in social life of those affected such that people lack fair opportunities for fulfilling their needs. In the past, mobility problems of people with a physical or sensory disability were the focus of attention, while other attributes causing mobility impairment, such as immigrant backgrounds, poverty, and so forth, were mainly ignored by research and planning, even though, according to estimates, more than one-third of the population are affected. Therefore, there is little qualitative or quantitative knowledge about these impairments and the individual consequences. The objective of this paper is to help fill this knowledge gap. The issue of fair opportunities regarding mobility and the term “mobility impairment” as used in this paper are defined. Fifteen types of mobility impairment are considered. The stratified sample for this survey included 541 mobility-impaired people in Austria with whom semistructured face-to-face interviews were conducted. A key result of the survey is the estimate of the number of people affected and the degree of their impairment. About half of those interviewed were hampered by more than one type of mobility impairment. From the point of view of those affected, there are difficulties that go beyond the mere physical barriers, which have been the focus of traffic planning. Problems are also caused by insufficient welfare systems, gender relations, inappropriate behavior of other transport users, and inadequate information and its transfer within the transport sector. For the solution, new and disregarded strategies are required.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Ronellenfitsch M. Begründung und Tragweite eines Grundrechts auf Mobilität (Justification and Consequences of a Basic Right to Mobility). Recht auf Mobilität–Grenzen der Mobilität (Right on Mobility–Boundary of Mobility). 1. Greifswalder Forum Umwelt und Verkehr 2005, Schriftenreihe Umwelt-Recht-Gesellschaft, Heft 1 (Rodi M., ed.), Berlin, 2005, pp. 73–116.
2. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Formal Confirmation, May 3, 2006.
3. Egalité Consortium. Intelligente Infrastruktur. éGALITé—Ein Gleichberechtigter Alltag im Telematikgestützten Verkehrsgeschehen (éGALITé— Fair Opportunities in Mobility Supported by Telematics). Final Report. Im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Innovationen und Technologie, Vienna, Austria, 2007.
4. Church A., Frost M., and Sullivan K. Transport and Social Exclusion in London. Transport Policy, Vol. 7, 2000, pp. 195–205.
5. Hine J., and Grieco M. Scatters and Clusters in Time and Space: Implications for Delivering Integrated and Inclusive Transport. Transport Policy, Vol. 10, 2003, pp. 207–219.
6. Schönfelder S., and Axhausen K.W. Activity Spaces: Measures of Social Exclusion? Transport Policy, Vol. 10, 2003, pp. 273–286.
7. Cass N., Shove E., and Urry J. Social Exclusion, Mobility and Access. The Sociological Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2005, pp. 539–555.
8. Egalitéplus Consortium. éGALITéplus—Ein Gleichberechtigter Alltag im Verkehrsgeschehen—Quantifizierung von Mobilitätsbeeinträchtigten Personengruppen (éGALITéplus—Fair Opportunities in Mobility— Quantification of Mobility-Impaired Groups). Final Report. Im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Innovationen und Technologie, Vienna, Austria, 2011.
9. Brackertz N. Who Is Hard To Reach and Why? ISR Working Paper. 2007. http://www.sisr.net/publications/0701brackertz.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2011.
10. Riandey B., and Quaglia M. Surveying Hard to Reach Groups. Presented at 8th International Conference on Survey Methods in Transport, Annecy, France, May 25–31, 2008.
11. Banister D., and Bowling A. Quality of Life for the Elderly: The Transport Dimension. Transport Policy, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2004, pp. 105–115.
12. Chlond B., and Ottmann P. The Mobility Behaviour of Single Parents and Their Activities Outside the Home. German Journal of Urban Studies, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2007. http://www.difu.de/node/5943. Accessed Feb. 17, 2011.
13. Kerschner H., and Aizenberg R. Focus Group Participants Reflect on Transportation. In Transportation in an Aging Society: A Decade of Experience. Technical Papers and Reports from a Conference, Bethesda, Md., Nov. 7–9, 1999. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 239–301.
14. Swanen T. The Mobility of Older People—An Introduction. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 18, 2010, pp. 591–595.
15. Cowham M., Webb J., Dye J., and Crowther B. Prioritising Street Improvements for Respondents with Disabilities: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Presented at 8th International Conference on Survey Methods in Transport, Annecy, France, May 25–31, 2008.
16. King G., Murray C. J. L., and Salomon J. A. Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research. American Political Science Review, Vol. 9888, No. 1, 2004, pp. 191–207.
17. Herry M., Sammer G., Schuster M., Röschel G., and Russ M. Allgemeine Mobilitätserhebung der österreichischen Haushalte, Endbericht (National Austrian Mobility Survey). Final Report. Im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wissenschaft, Verkehr und Kunst, Vienna, Austria, 1996.
18. Amt der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung, Abteilung Gesamtver-kehrsangelegenheiten, Niederösterreichische Landesakademie, Bereich Umwelt und Energie. Mobilität in Niederösterreich—Ergebnisse der landesweiten Mobilitätsbefragung 2008 (Mobility in Lower Austria—Results of the Statewide Mobility Survey 2008). Saint Pölten, Austria, 2008.
19. Groß S., and Freyer W. Mobilitäts- und Verkehrsverhalten von Jugendlichen. Tagungsband zu den 18. Verkehrswissenschaftlichen Tagen der TU Dresden, Germany, 2001.
20. Pestalozzi Ch., Conrad V., Schmidt E., Manser J., and Rüdisüli B. Hindernisfreier Verkehrsraum—Anforderungen aus Sicht von Menschen mit Behinderung. Eidgenössisches Departement für Umwelt, Verkehr, Energie und Kommunikation UVEK, Switzerland, 2010.
21. The Principles of Universal Design, Version 2.0. Raleigh, Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1997. http://www.ncsu.edu/www/ncsu/design/sod5/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm Accessed June 2011.
22. Egger V., and Klenovec M. Barrierefreies Bauen: Ausbildung und Beratung in österreich. Analyse und Ausblick. Bundesministerium für Arbeit, Soziales und Kosumentenschutz (BMASK), Austria, 2010.
23. Segert A. Mobilitätsorientierung—ein Eigenständiger Faktor für die Entwicklung Nachhaltiger Mobilität im Ländlichen Raum. Online-Fachzeitschrift des Bundesministeriums für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Vienna, Austria, 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gerd Sammer
Institute for Transport Studies, Department of Landscape, Spatial, and Infrastructure Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter Jordan-Strasse 82, Vienna A-1190, Austria.
Tina Uhlmann
Institute for Transport Studies, Department of Landscape, Spatial, and Infrastructure Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter Jordan-Strasse 82, Vienna A-1190, Austria.
Wiebke Unbehaun
Institute for Transport Studies, Department of Landscape, Spatial, and Infrastructure Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter Jordan-Strasse 82, Vienna A-1190, Austria.
Alexandra Millonig
Austrian Institute of Technology, Giefinggasse 2, Vienna A-1210, Austria.
Bettina Mandl
Austrian Institute of Technology, Giefinggasse 2, Vienna A-1210, Austria.
Jens Dangschat
Sociology Section (ISRA), Department of Spatial Development, Infrastructure, and Environmental Planning, Vienna University of Technology, Paniglgasse 16, Vienna A-1040, Austria.
René Mayr
Sociology Section (ISRA), Department of Spatial Development, Infrastructure, and Environmental Planning, Vienna University of Technology, Paniglgasse 16, Vienna A-1040, Austria.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 199

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 23

  1. Impacts of disability on daily travel behaviour: A systematic review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Mobility-impaired people’s preferences for a specialized paratransit s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Traveling More Independently: A Study on the Diverse Needs and Challen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Fair mobility budgets: A concept for achieving climate neutrality and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Introduction to Robotics for Gait Assistance and Rehabilitation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. The Role of Place Types on Social Satisfaction as Influenced by Covid ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Assessment of a Robotic Walker in Older Adults With Parkinson's Diseas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Developing an evidence-informed framework for safe and accessible urba...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. The journey experience of visually impaired people on public transport...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. The Application of Geographic Information Systems to Support Wayfindin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Fire emergency evacuation procedures for differently-abled community i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Technologies for Therapy and Assistance of Lower Limb Disabilities: Si...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Disability, Mobility and Transport in Low- and Middle-Income Countries...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Stimulating usage problem generation: An urban mobility case study
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. A Digitally-Augmented Ground Space with Timed Visual Cues for Facilita...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Connected and Automated Vehicles: Chances for Elderly Travellers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Landmark-enhanced route itineraries for navigation of blind pedestrian...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Indoor-Outdoor Intermodal Sidewalk-Based Navigation Instructions for P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Review of Public Transport Needs of Older People in European Context
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Explorations into ICT usage and behavior in travel related activities ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Crowdsourcing of Accessibility Attributes on Sidewalk-Based Geodatabas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Barriers and their Influence on the Mobility Behavior of Elder Pedestr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Open Data and the Needs of Older People for Public Transport Informati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub