Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Gender Differences in Response to Policies Targeting Commute to Automobile-Restricted Central Business District: Stated Preference Study of Mode Choice in Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Several studies have indicated that responses to policies intended to reduce car use may fall short of the predicted or desired response, which suggests a need for improved behavioral models. One basis for improvement is to better account for population heterogeneity. In particular, studies show that men and women have different transportation patterns that reflect gender-related characteristics and roles in families; these differences can be manifested in their mode choice in the presence of demand management strategies. On the basis of stated preference data on mode choice that were gathered from a sample of drivers commuting to the central business district in Tehran, Iran, this study used generalized nested logit models to find the significant variables that affected each gender's mode choice under some price- and time-oriented policies. Although some variables were common to both genders, other variables influenced only men's or only women's behavior. Further, some of the common variables did not have the same signs for both genders; this finding offers post hoc validation of the need to model the genders’ behavior separately. Several results suggest that the hypothetical policies tested elicited changes not only in travel behavior, but possibly also in household roles and lifestyle. The authors believe that understanding the gender-based differences in factors important to mode choice can help identify policies that serve each gender's needs better and thus potentially increase the willingness of both genders to shift away from driving.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Loukopoulos P., Jakobsson C., and Gärling T. Car-User Responses to Travel Demand Management Measures: Goal Setting and Choice of Adaptation Alternatives. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2004, pp. 263–280.
2. Jeff G.J., and McElroy R. Women's Travel Consequences and Opportunities. Proc., Second National Conference on Women's Travel Issues, Baltimore, Md., 1996, pp. 80–93.
3. Goddard T.B., Handy S. L., Cao X., and Mokhtarian P.L. Voyage of the SS Minivan: Women's Travel Behavior in Traditional and Suburban Neighborhoods. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1956, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 141–148.
4. Wachs M. The Gender Gap: How Men and Women Developed Different Travel Patterns. ITS Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1997, pp. 1–2.
5. Roberts J., Hodgson R., and Dolan P. “It's Driving Her Mad”: Gender Differences in the Effects of Commuting on Psychological Health. Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1064–1076.
6. Nobis C., and Lenz B. Gender Differences in Travel Patterns: Role of Employment Status and Household Structure. In Conference Proceedings 35: Research on Women's Issues in Transportation, Vol. 2: Technical Papers, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 114–126.
7. Weston L. M. Gender Differences in Travel Behavior of 13-, 14-, and 15-Year-Olds and Role of Built Environment. In Conference Proceedings 35: Research on Women's Issues in Transportation, Vol. 2: Technical Papers, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, p. 76 (abstract only).
8. Rosenbloom S. Trends in Women's Travel Patterns. Proc., Second National Conference on Women's Travel Issues, Baltimore, Md., 1996, pp. 16–34.
9. McGuckin N., and Nakamoto Y. Differences in Trip Chaining by Men and Women. In Conference Proceedings 35: Research on Women's Issues in Transportation, Vol. 2: Technical Papers, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 49–58.
10. Li H., Guensler R. L., and Ogle J. Comparing Women's and Men's Morning Commute Trip Chaining in Atlanta, Georgia, by Using Instrumented Vehicle Activity Data. In Conference Proceedings 35: Research on Women's Issues in Transportation, Vol. 2: Technical Papers, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 14–20.
11. Zhou Y., Outwater M. L., and Proussaloglou K. Market Research on Gender-Based Attitudinal Preferences and Travel Behavior. In Conference Proceedings 35: Research on Women's Issues in Transportation, Vol. 2: Technical Papers, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 171–179.
12. Patterson Z., Ewing G., and Haider M. Gender-Based Analysis of Work Trip Mode Choice of Commuters in Suburban Montreal, Canada, with Stated Preference Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1924, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 85–93.
13. Giuliano G., and Small K.A. Alternative Strategies for Coping with Traffic Congestion. The University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, 1994. In Urban Agglomeration and Economic Growth (Giersch H., ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995, pp. 199–226.
14. Ben-Elia E., and Ettema D. Changing Commuters’ Behavior Using Rewards: A Study of Rush-Hour Avoidance. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2011, pp. 354–368.
15. O'Fallon C., Sullivan C., and Hensher D.A. Constraints Affecting Mode Choices by Morning Car Commuters. Transport Policy, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2004, pp. 17–29.
16. Tehran Governor's Website. An Introduction to Tehran. http://www.ostan-th.ir/images/pdf/e.pdf. Accessed Nov. 13, 2011.
17. Statistical Center of Iran. Summary Results of the Urban and Rural Household Income and Expenditure Survey. http://www.amar.org.ir/Upload/Modules/Contents/asset0/english/summary_results-final_1388_2009_.docx.pdf. Accessed Nov. 13, 2011.
18. Statistics and Information of Tehran and Tehran Municipality. Population, Immigration. http://statistics.tehran.ir/dashboard88/layout.php?sectionID=46=46. Accessed Nov. 13, 2011.
19. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S. R., Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
20. Wen C., and Koppelman F.S. The Generalized Nested Logit Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 35, 2001, pp. 627–641.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

ReyhanehSadat Shahangian
Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Avenue, P.O. Box 11365-8639, Tehran, Iran.
Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616.
Mohammad Kermanshah
Department of Civil Engineering and Traffic Engineering Research Center, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Avenue, P.O. Box 11365-8639, Tehran, Iran.
Patricia L. Mokhtarian
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 54

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 8

  1. A systematic literature review of mobility attitudes and mode choices:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The Association between the Regular Use of ICT Based Mobility Services...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The Relationship between Regular Use of Ridesourcing and Frequency of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. The Association between Regular Use of Ridesourcing and Walking Mode C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Evidence of gendered modal split from Warsaw, Poland
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Will autonomous vehicles change residential location and vehicle owner...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A discrete choice analysis of transport mode choice causality and perc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Coping with congestion: Understanding the role of simultaneous transpo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub