Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2012

Dynamic Maximum Speed Limits: Perception, Mental Workload, and Compliance

Abstract

Application of dynamic maximum speed limits may lead to positive effects for the environment, safety, and traffic flows. However, the efficacy of this dynamic traffic management measure depends largely on the behavior of drivers (i.e., compliance). In this paper, it is conjectured that compliance does not depend solely on attitudes of drivers but also depends on drivers’ perceptions of the dynamic maximum speed limit signs and mental workload. It is assumed that characteristics of the dynamic maximum speed limit signs influence the perceptions of drivers as well as their mental workload. It is, however, not yet clear to what extent characteristics of the signs influence perception, mental workload, and compliance of drivers. Therefore, two driving simulator experiments were performed to investigate the influence of four factors on drivers’ perception, mental workload, and compliance. The factors studied were the signs’ content, implementation, location, and frequency. From the results, it followed that different effects of these factors could be observed. For example, it was observed that the frequency with which dynamic maximum speed limit signs were provided to the drivers had a significant influence on perception and compliance, although a significant effect on mental workload could not be established. The paper concludes with a discussion of results and recommendations for future research.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Schagen I., Wegman F., and Roszbach R. Veilige en geloofwaardige snelheidslimieten; een strategische verkenning. Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid, Leidschendam, Nederland, 2004.
2. Oei H. Veiligheidsconsequenties van Intelligente Snelheidsadaptatie ISA; Mogelijke effecten op de verkeersveiligheid bij algehele invoering van ISA in Nederland. Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid, Leidschendam, Nederland, 2001.
3. Stoelhorst H., Schreuder M., Polderdijk S., Harms I.M., Kessels J., de Klerk M., et al. Dynamische Maximumsnelheden: evaluatie praktijk-proeven. Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Rijkswaterstaat, Dienst Verkeer en Scheepvaart, Delft, Nederland, 2010.
4. Lee C., Hellinga B., and Saccomanno F. Evaluation of Variable Speed Limits to Improve Traffic Safety. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2006, pp. 213–228.
5. Factsheet naar geloofwaardige snelheidslimieten. Stichting Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Verkeersveiligheid, Leidschendam, Nederland, 2009.
6. Johansson G., and Rumar K. Drivers and Road Signs: A Preliminary Investigation of the Capacity of Car Drivers to Get Information from Road Signs. Ergonomics, Vol. 9, 1966, pp. 57–62.
7. Johansson G., and Backlund F. Drivers and Road Signs. Ergonomics, Vol. 13, No. 6, 1970, pp. 749–759.
8. Luoma J. Evaluations of Validity of Two Research Methods for Studying Perception of Road Signs. Report UMTRI-91-15. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, 1991.
9. Rama P. Effects of Weather-Controlled Variable Message Signing on Driver Behavior. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, 2001.
10. Liu B.-S., Hsu C.-H., Tseng H.-Y., and Chia T.-C. Evaluation of the Effects of Visual Field on Road Sign Recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4562, 2007, pp. 741–749.
11. Brookhuis K., De Vries G., and de Waard D. The Effects of Mobile Telephoning on Driving Performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1991, pp. 309–316.
12. Zijlstra F. Efficiency in Work Behavior: A Design Approach for Modern Tools. Delft University Press, Delft, Netherlands, 1993.
13. Wickens C.D., Alexander A. L., Thomas L.C., Horrey W.J., Nunes A., Hardy T. J., Zheng X. S. Traffic and Flight Guidance Depiction on a Synthetic Vision System Display: The Effects of Clutter on Performance and Visual Attention Allocation. Technical Report AHFD-04-10/NASA(HPM)-04-1. Aviation Human Factors Division, Institute of Aviation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Savoy, 2004.
14. Recarte M.A., and Nunes L.M. Effects of Verbal and Spatial-Imagery Tasks on Eye Fixation While Driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2000, pp. 31–43.
15. LaBerge D. Attentional Processing: The Brain's Art of Mindfulness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1995.
16. Wickens C. Multiple Resources and Performance Prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2002, pp. 159–177.
17. Moray N. The Strategic Control of Information Processing. In Strategies of Information Processing (Underwood G., ed.), Academic Press, Inc., 1978, pp. 301–328.
18. Leach J., and Campling J. Survival Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England, 1994.
19. Young M.S., Mahfoud J. M., Stanton N.A., Walker G.H., Salmon P.M., and Jenkins D.P. Eyes Front! Are Roadside Billboards Bad for Driver Attention? Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 48, No. 8, 2007, pp. 365–367.
20. Brookhuis K., and Dicke M. The Effects of Travel Information Presentation Through Nomadic Systems on Driver Behavior. European Transport Research Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2009, pp. 67–74.
21. Wogalter M.S., Magurno A. B., Rashid R., and Klein K.W. The Influence of Time Stress and Location on Behavioral Warning Compliance. Safety Science, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1998, pp. 143–158.
22. Pittet D., Hugonnet S., Harbarth S., Mourouga P., Sauvan V., Touveneau S., and Perneger T.V. Effectiveness of a Hospital-Wide Programme to Improve Compliance with Hand Hygiene. The Lancet, Vol. 356, No. 9238, Oct. 14, 2000, pp. 1307–1312.
23. Tornros J., and Bolling A. Mobile Phone Use: Effects of Conversation on Mental Workload and Driving Speed in Rural and Urban Environments. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2006, pp. 298–306.
24. Makishita H., and Matsunaga K. Differences of Drivers’ Reaction Times According to Age and Mental Workload. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2008, pp. 567–575.
25. Horrey W.J., Lesch M. F., and Garabet A. Dissociation Between Driving Performance and Drivers’ Subjective Estimates of Performance and Workload in Dual-Task Conditions. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2009, pp. 7–12.
26. Mulder L. Cardiovascular Reactivity and Mental Workload. International Journal of Psychophysiology, Vol. 7, No. 2–4, 1989, pp. 321–322.
27. Chang C.Y., and Li C. C. Visual and Operational Impacts of Variable Speed Limit Signs on Bus Drivers on Freeways Using Driving Simulator. Proc., 3rd IEEE Asia–Pacific Services Computing Conference, APSCC 2008, Yilan, Taiwan, IEEE, New York, 2008, pp. 1453–1458.
28. Martens M.H., and Fox M. R. J. Do Familiarity and Expectations Change Perception? Drivers’ Glances and Response to Changes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2007, pp. 476–492.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2012
Issue published: January 2012

Rights and permissions

© 2012 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

R. G. Hoogendoorn
Department of Transport and Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, Netherlands.
I. M. Harms
Rijkswaterstaat Center for Transport and Navigation, Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, Schoemakerstraat 97, P.O. Box 5044, 2600 GA Delft, Netherlands.
S. P. Hoogendoorn
Department of Transport and Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, Netherlands.
K. A. Brookhuis
Department of Transport Policy and Logistics, Faculty of Technology, Policy, and Management, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, Netherlands.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 44

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 10

  1. Driving Behaviour and Usability: Should In-Vehicle Speed Limit Warning...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Driver distraction detection using capsule network
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Adaptations in driver deceleration behaviour with automatic incident d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Driver speed compliance following automatic incident detection: Insigh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Politeness in security directives: Insights in browser compliance for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. The safety effect of open-median management on one-side widened freewa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Traffic management: Assessing various countermeasures to improve detec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Driver’s Cognitive Workload and Driving Performance under Traffic Sign...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Detection of Driver Cognitive Distraction: A Comparison Study of Stop-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Dynamic traffic management on a familiar road: Failing to detect chang...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub