Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Airport Pavement Missing Data Management and Imputation with Stochastic Multiple Imputation Model

Abstract

In practice, missing data in pavement condition databases have been one of the most prevalent problems in airport pavement management systems. Missing data present problems in pavement performance analysis and uncertainties in pavement management decision making. A number of data imputation approaches are available for handling missing data. This paper examines the limitations of the conventional data imputation methods and proposes a stochastic multiple imputation (MI) approach to overcome major limitations associated with conventional data imputation methods. A case study is presented to appraise the effectiveness of the proposed approach against three conventional data imputation methods, namely, substitution by mean, substitution by interpolation, and substitution by regression methods. The roughness and friction data of a 4-km-long runway pavement and the roughness data of a 4-km-long taxiway pavement were considered in the study. The effectiveness of auxiliary variables in data imputation models was also demonstrated. Results from the performance appraisal indicated that the proposed stochastic MI method yielded the smallest errors for the roughness as well as friction data. Furthermore, the substitution by mean method resulted in imputed values with the highest amount of deviations from the observed values, followed by the substitution by regression method, and the substitution by interpolation method. Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed stochastic MI method outperformed conventional methods in handling missing runway and taxiway pavement roughness and friction data and provides an effective approach to impute missing data required in an airport pavement management system.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements. FAA, Dec. 3, 1982.
2. Amado V., and Bernhardt K. L. S. Knowledge Discovery in Pavement Condition Data. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2002.
3. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practices 401: Quality Management of Pavement Condition Data Collection. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2009.
4. Lindly J. K., Bell F., and Sharif U. Specifying Automated Pavement Condition Surveys. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2005, pp. 19–32.
5. Schafer J. L., and Graham J. W. Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art. Psychological Methods, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2002, pp. 147–177.
6. Little R. J. A., and Rubin D. B. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley, New York, 1987.
7. Allison P. D. Missing Data: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2002.
8. Yang J., Lu J. J., and Gunaratne M. Application of Neural Network Models for Forecasting of Pavement Crack Index and Pavement Condition Rating. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1699, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 03–12.
9. Bennett C. R. Sectioning of Road Data for Pavement. Presented at 6th International Conference on Managing Pavements, Queensland, Australia, 2004.
10. Buck S. F. A Method of Estimation of Missing Values in Multivariate Data Suitable for Use with an Electronic Computer. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 22, 1960, pp. 302–307.
11. Wasito I. Least Squares Algorithms with Nearest Neighbour Techniques for Imputing Missing Data Values. PhD dissertation. University of London, 2003.
12. Roth P. L. Missing Data: A Conceptual Review for Applied Psychologists. Personnel Psychology, Vol. 47, 1994, pp. 537–570.
13. Bennett D. A. How Can I Deal with Missing Data in My Study? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol. 25, 2001, pp. 464–469.
14. Marwala T. Computational Intelligence for Missing Data Imputation, Estimation, and Management: Knowledge Optimization Techniques, 1st ed. IGI Global, New York, 2009, pp. 09.
15. Collins L. M., Schafer J. L., and Kam C. A Comparison of Inclusive and Restrictive Strategies in Modern Missing Data Procedures. Psychological Methods, Vol. 6, 2001, pp. 330–351.
16. Acock A. C. Working with Missing Values. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 67, 2005, pp. 1012–1028.
17. Rubin D. B. Multiple Imputation for Survey Nonresponse. John Wiley, New York, 1987.
18. Tanner M. A., and Wong W. H. The Calculation of Posterior Distributions by Data Augmentation. Journal of American Statistical Association, Vol. 82, 1987, pp. 528–550.
19. Schafer J. L. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. Chapman & Hall, London, 1997.
20. Dempster A. P., Laird N. M., and Rubin D. B. Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 39, No. 1, 1977, pp. 01–38.
21. Ripley B. D. Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1996.
22. Fraley C. On Computing the Largest Fraction of Missing Information for the EM Algorithm and the Worst Linear Function for Data Augmentation. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 31, 1999, pp. 13–26.
23. Schafer J. L., and Olsen M. K. Multiple Imputation for Multivariate Missing-Data Problems: A Data Analyst's Perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 33, 1998, pp. 545–571.
24. Schafer J. L., and Rubin D. B. Multiple Imputation for Missing Data Problems. Presented at Joint Statistical Meetings, Dallas, Tex., Aug. 1998.
25. Rapol J. Evaluation of Grade and Straightedge Tolerances in Federal Aviation Administration Pavement Construction Specifications. Presented at Federal Aviation Administration Airport Technology Transfer Conference, FAA Airport Technology R&D Branch, Atlantic City, N.J., 2002.
26. Runway Roughness Measurement, Quantification, and Application—The Boeing Method. Document # D6-81746. Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, USA, Nov. 1995.
27. Hill T., and Lewicki P. Statistics: Methods and Applications. Statsoft, Inc., Tulsa, Okla., 2006, pp. 652.
28. Armstrong J. S., and Collopy F. Error Measures for Generalizing About Forecasting Methods: Empirical Comparisons. International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 8, 1992, pp. 69–80.
29. Neter J., Wasserman W., and Kutner M. H. Applied Linear Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, Ill., 1990, pp. 38–44, 62–104.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

J. Farhan
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260.
T. F. Fwa
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 27

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 10

  1. Estimating the Values of Missing Data Related to Infrastructure Condit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Method to Reduce Uncertainty in the Prediction of Pavement Condition W...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Traffic State Data Imputation: An Efficient Generating Method Based on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Deep learning based missing data recovery of non-stationary wind veloc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Generative Adversarial Network for Imputation of Road Network Traffic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Traffic Flow Imputation Using Parallel Data and Generative Adversarial...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Establishment of Prediction Models of Asphalt Pavement Performance bas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. An efficient realization of deep learning for traffic data imputation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Investigation of the Ability to Estimate Values of Road Section Condit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Augmented Stochastic Multiple Imputation Model for Airport Pavement Mi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub