Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Implementing GigaPan Technology into an Airport's Foreign Object Debris Management Program

Abstract

This paper presents a technology that can easily be implemented at airports by airport operators to conduct inspections for daily foreign object debris (FOD). The process includes developing gigapixel panoramas of an airport runway that can be reviewed close to live time by trained staff. The approach promotes an inexpensive means for FOD detection without conducting daily runway drive-through tours. In addition to FOD inspection, the technology might be used as a tool for the pavement management system and for detecting wildlife. GigaPan technology is used to develop high-resolution panoramas from multiple grid images. The technology incorporates a robotic camera mount and corresponding software to develop a composite image from multiple images. The high-resolution gigapixel panorama enables a viewer to zoom in on objects within the panorama, similar in approach to Google Earth. Consequently, panorama viewing becomes interactive. This paper reviews GigaPan technology and how it can be incorporated into FOD inspections to promote airfield runway safety.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Airport Foreign Object Debris Management. Advisory Circular 150/5210-24. FAA, 2010.
2. Prather C. D. ACRP Synthesis 26: Current Airport Inspection Practices Regarding FOD (Foreign Object Debris/Damage). Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.
3. Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Ground Operations Occurrences at Australian Airports 1998–2008. www.atsb.gov.au/media/1529837/ar2009042.pdf. Accessed July 19, 2012.
4. Li X., Keegan K., and Yazdani A. Index of Foreign Object Damage in Airfield Pavement Management. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2153, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 81–87.
5. McCreary I. Runway Safety: FOD, Birds, and the Case for Automated Scanning. Insight SRI, Washington, D.C., 2010.
6. Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 139, Airport Certification. FAA, 2004.
7. Vogel B. FOD Systems Advance. Jane's Airport Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2007.
8. Advisory Circular 150/5220-24: Airport Foreign Object Debris Detection Equipment. FAA, 2009.
9. City of Fayetteville Arkansas. Fayetteville Executive Airport. www.accessfayetteville.org/government/aviation/index.cfm. Accessed July 24, 2012.
10. McClelland Consulting Engineers. Fayetteville Municipal Airport/Drake Field Master Plan Update. Tulsa, Okla. Dec. 2006. www.accessfayetteville.org/government/aviation/documents/master_plan_update/G-Airport_Plans.PDF. Accessed Feb. 18, 2013.
11. Longson J., Cooper G., Gibson R., Gibson M., Rawlins J., and Sargent R. Adapting Traditional Macro and Micro Photography for Scientific Gigapixel Imaging. 2010. Fine International Conference on Gigapixel Imaging for Science. repository.cmu.edu/gigapixel/1. Accessed Feb. 18, 2013.
12. Frenkel K. A. Panning for Science. Science, Vol. 330, No. 605, 2010, pp. 748–749.
13. GigaPan. GigaPan EPIC Pro User Guide. gigapan.com/cms/manuals/epic-introduction. Accessed July 27, 2012.
14. Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A: Airport Design. FAA, 2012.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ernie Heymsfield
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, 4190 Bell Engineering Center, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Mark Kuss
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, 4190 Bell Engineering Center, Fayetteville, AR 72701.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 30

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. A Technical and Operational Perspective on Quality Analysis of Stitchi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub