Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Road Safety Benefits from Bus Priority: An Empirical Study

Abstract

The provision of bus priority is often a major consideration in on-street bus rapid transit design. However, the research is limited and suggests mixed outcomes. This paper explores the impact of bus priority treatments on road safety. An empirical analysis of accident data about bus rapid transit routes in Melbourne, Australia, was conducted. The analysis included an aggregate crash frequency analysis that accounted for statistical effects and a disaggregate analysis that used a safety audit and review of accident types. Overall, bus priority treatments reduced accidents, with a statistically significant reduction of 14.0%. The number of fatal and serious incidents dropped considerably (42 to 29 per annum). The disaggregate safety audit showed reductions in intolerable risks, but some concerns such as interaction of buses and traffic at bus lane setbacks (section of a curbside lane where traffic may enter to make a turn as the bus lane reaches an intersection) and greater pedestrian road-crossing distances caused by bus lanes. However, disaggregate analysis of accident type suggested that bus lanes act as a roadside buffer, reducing collisions with roadside objects and other vehicles. The shifting of stopping buses from the traffic lane into a bus lane was shown to reduce accidents. Bus lanes were thought to increase sight distances at unsignalized intersections and consequently reduce accidents with vehicles to the side. Some treatments were thought to increase traffic density, creating safety benefits through slowed traffic. These findings were statistically robust and suggest that a new perspective on planning for and justifying bus priority measures is warranted.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Levinson H., Zimmerman S., Clinger J., Rutherford S., Smith R. L., Cracknell J., and Soberman R. TCRP Report 90: Bus Rapid Transit Volume 1: Case Studies in Bus Rapid Transit, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
2. Hinebaugh D. Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making. National Bus Rapid Transit Institute, Tampa, Fla., 2009.
3. Bus Rapid Transit Shows Promise. U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C., 2001.
4. Black J. A., Lim P. N., and Kim G. H. A Traffic Model for the Optimal Allocation of Arterial Road Space: A Case Study of Seoul's First Experimental Bus Lane. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1999, pp. 195–207.
5. Public Transport Priority: State of the Art Review. In PRISCILLA Bus Priority Strategies and Impact Scenarios—Deliverable 2, University of Southampton, United Kingdom, 2002.
6. Currie G., Sarvi M., and Young B. A New Approach to Evaluating On-Road Public Transport Priority Projects: Balancing the Demand for Limited Road-Space. Transportation, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2007, pp. 413–428.
7. Mesbah M., Sarvi M., and Currie G. New Methodology for Optimizing Transit Priority at the Network Level. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2089, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 93–100.
8. NCHRP Research Results Digest 352: Cost/Benefit Analysis of Converting a Lane for Bus Rapid Transit—Phase II Evaluation and Methodology. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.
9. Currie G., and Delbosc A. Bus Rapid Transit in Australasia: An Update on Progress. Built Environment, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2010, pp. 328–343.
10. Currie G., and Delbosc A. Understanding Bus Rapid Transit Route Ridership Drivers: An Empirical Study of Australian BRT Systems. Transport Policy, Vol. 18, No. 5, 2011, pp. 755–764.
11. Levinson H. S., Zimmerman S., Clinger J., Gast J., Rutherford S., and Bruhn E. TCRP Report 90: Bus Rapid Transit Volume 2: Implementation Guidelines. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
12. Booz Allen Hamilton. International Approaches to Tackling Transport Congestion Paper 10 (Final): Traffic Management—Road Space Reallocation. Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission, Melbourne, Australia, 2006.
13. Mulley C. No Car Lanes or Bus Lanes: Which Gives Public Transport the Better Priority? An Evaluation of Priority Lanes in Tyne and Wear. University of Sydney, Australia, 2011.
14. Sarna A. C., Sarin Sharfuddin S. M., and Sharma B. M. Reserved Bus-Lane System: A Case Study of Delhi. Journal of the Indian Roads Congress, No. 46, 1985, pp. 239–285.
15. LaPlante J., and Harrington T. Contraflow Bus Lanes in Chicago: Safety and Traffic Impacts. In Transportation Research Record 957, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 80–90.
16. Cooner S. A., and Ranft S. E. Safety Evaluation of Buffer-Separated High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes in Texas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1959, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 168–177.
17. Skowronek D. A., Ranft S. E., and Cothron A. S. An Evaluation of Dallas Area HOV Lanes, Year 2002. Research Report 4961-6. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2002.
18. Cheung C., Shalaby A. S., Persaud B. N., and Hadayeghi A. Models for Safety Analysis of Road Surface Transit. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2063, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 168–175.
19. Shahla F., Shalaby A., Persaud B. N., and Hadayeghi A. Analysis of Transit Safety at Signalized Intersections in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2102, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 108–114.
20. Strathman J. G., Wachana P., and Callas S. Analysis of Bus Collision and Non-collision Incidents Using Transit ITS and Other Archived Operations Data. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2010, pp. 137–144.
21. Ragland D. R., Hundenski R. J., Holman B. L., and Fisher J. M. Traffic Volume and Collisions Involving Transit and Nontransit Vehicles. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 24, No. 5, 1992, pp. 547–558.
22. Hedelin A., Björnstig U., and Brismar B. Trams: A Risk Factor for Pedestrians. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 28, No. 6, 1996, pp. 733–738.
23. Lowrie P. R. SCATS: A Traffic Responsive Method of Controlling Urban Traffic. Traffic Authority of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 1992.
24. Smith H. R., Hemily B., and Ivanovic M. Transit Signal Priority (TSP): A Planning and Implementation Handbook. ITS America, Washington, D.C., 2005.
25. Road Safety Road Rules 2009. Australian Transport Council, Canberra, 2009.
27. Hauer E. Observational Before-and-After Studies in Road Safety. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997.
28. Hadayeghi A., Shalaby A. S., and Persaud B. N. Macrolevel Accident Prediction Models for Evaluating Safety of Urban Transportation Systems. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1840, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 87–95.
29. Miaou S.-P., and Lum H. Modeling Vehicle Accidents and Highway Geometric Design Relationships. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 25, 1993, pp. 689–709.
30. Sawalha Z., and Sayed T. Evaluating Safety of Urban Arterial Roadways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 127, 2001, pp. 151–158.
31. Getting Started with STATA for Windows: Release 9. STATA Press, College Station, Tex., 2005.
32. Miaou S.-P., Lu A., and Lum H. S. Pitfalls of Using R-Squared to Evaluate Goodness of Fit of Accident Prediction Models. In Transportation Research Record 1542, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 6–13.
33. Gross F., and Jovanis P. P. Estimation of the Safety Effectiveness of Lane and Shoulder Width: Case-Control Approach. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 133, No. 6, 2007, pp. 362–369.
34. Elvik R., Hoye A., Vaa T., and Sorensen M. (eds.). The Handbook of Road Safety Measures. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, United Kingdom, 2009.
35. Highway Safety Manual. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2011.
36. Kar K., and Blankenship M. R. Road Safety Audit: Findings from Successful Applications in Arizona. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2182, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 113–120.
37. Guide to Road Safety Part 6: Road Safety Audit. Austroads, Sydney, Australia, 2009.
38. FHWA Road Safety Audit Guidelines. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kelvin Chun Keong Goh
Public Transport Research Group, Institute of Transport Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Building 60, Australia.
Graham Currie
Public Transport Research Group, Institute of Transport Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Building 60, Australia.
Majid Sarvi
Public Transport Research Group, Institute of Transport Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Building 60, Australia.
David Logan
Accident Research Centre, Building 70, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 256

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 23

  1. Do Traffic Countermeasures Improve the Safety of Vulnerable Road Users...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Safety Evaluation of the First Bus Rapid Transit System in Tanzania
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A comparative evaluation of the safety performance of bus priority rou...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Microscopic Traffic Risk Assessment at Signalized Intersections of a B...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Reduced Road Injuries While Commuting Due to Heavy Snowfall and Ensuin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. A resampling approach to disaggregate analysis of bus-involved crashes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Transport System and Infrastructure
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Quantifying the Safety Benefits of Transit Signal Priority Using Full ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Safety Evaluation of Transit Signal Priority with Bus Speed Volatility...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Data mining approach to model bus crash severity in Australia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. An Examination of the Safety Impacts of Bus Priority Routes in Major I...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Accident Analysis of Bus Rapid Transit System: Before and after constr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Examining the relationship between road safety outcomes and the built ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Impact of Bus Routes on Crash Frequency in Metropolitan Areas
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Assessing Effects of Transit Signal Priority on Traffic Safety: Empiri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Traffic Accident Analysis With Or Without Bus Priority
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Evaluating the quality of the service offered by a bus rapid transit s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Traveling by Bus Instead of Car on Urban Major Roads: Safety Benefits ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Assessing Safety Implications of Bus Priority Systems: A Case-Study of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Road Safety Effects of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Systems: a Call for Evi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Factors affecting the probability of bus drivers being at-fault in bus...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Bus accident analysis of routes with/without bus priority
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Experimental Microsimulation Modeling of Road Safety Impacts of Bus Pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub