Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Noncoverage Errors in Travel Surveys Due to Mobile Phone–Only Households

Abstract

National and regional household travel surveys have conventionally sampled landline telephone households through list-assisted random digit dialing. However, recent increases in “mobile phone-only” households result in either noncoverage or undercoverage of a growing segment of the population. This result could cause a substantial bias in the representativeness of travel behavior toward the target population. To cover mobile phone-only households, an address-based sampling method is of interest. This study explores whether the characteristics and travel behavior of mobile phone-only households differ from those of households with landline telephones. In addition, this study quantifies the extent of noncoverage errors in the surveys in respondents’ travel behavior. Along with census data, the mobile phone-only sample (N = 2,988) was compared with the landline telephone sample (N = 7,774) drawn from the 2008 National Capital Region Household Travel Survey. Results show that the mobile phone-only sample consisted of relatively more single-person households; younger individuals; and Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics, who were generally identified as hard-to-reach groups. Statistical models were estimated to examine differences in travel behavior and suggested that the mobile phone-only households made more transit (41%) and walking (29%) trips. This study shows that the inclusion of the mobile phone-only households can reduce the noncoverage errors, especially for alternative modes. The implications for travel survey methods are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. McGuckin N., and Contrino H. Hard to Reach Groups in Household Travel Surveys. Subcommittee on Household Surveys, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012. http://www.travelsurveymethods.org/ppts/HH/Hard%20to%20Reach%20Pops%20Final.pptx. Accessed May 21, 2012.
2. Sharp J. Travel Survey Methods and Technologies Resource Paper. Presented at National Household Travel Survey Conference: Understanding Our Nation's Travel. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004. http://www.trb.org/Conferences/NHTS/Workshop-TravelSurvey.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2012.
3. Blumberg S., and Luke J. Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January–June 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless201112_tables.htm. Accessed July 22, 2012.
4. 2007/2008 TPB Household Travel Survey: Technical Documentation. National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, D.C., 2010.
5. 2009 National Household Travel Survey User's Guide (Version 2). FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/UsersGuideV2.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2012.
6. Boyle J., Bucuvalas M., Piekarski L., and Weiss A. Zero Banks. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 73, 2009, pp. 729–750.
7. Giaimo G., Anderson R., Wargelin L., and Stopher P. Will It Work? Pilot Results from First Large-Scale Global Positioning System–Based Household Travel Survey in the United States. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2176, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 26–34.
8. Chiao K.-A., Argote J., Zmud J., Hilsenbeck K., Zmud M., and Wolf J. Continuous Improvement in Regional Household Travel Surveys: New York Metropolitan Transportation Council Experience. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2246, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 74–82.
9. Iannacchione V. G., Staab J. M., and Redden D. T. Evaluating the Use of Residential Mailing Addresses in a Metropolitan Household Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 67, 2003, pp. 202–210.
10. Link M. W., Battaglia M. P., Frankel M. R., Osborn L., and Mokdad A. H. Address-based versus Random-Digit-Dial Surveys: Comparison of Key Health and Risk Indicators. American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 164, 2006, pp. 1019–1025.
11. Sen S., Zmud J. P., and Arce C. Efficiency and Effectiveness of Cell Phone Samples in Transportation Surveys. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2105, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 44–50.
12. Link M. W., Battaglia M. P., Frankel M. R., Osborn L., and Mokdad A. H. A Comparison of Address-Based Sampling (ABS) Versus Random-Digit Dialing (RDD) for General Population Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 72, 2008, pp. 6–27.
13. Link M., Battaglia M., Giambo P., Frankel M., and Mokdad A. Assessment of Address Frame Replacements for RDD Sampling Frames. In Proc., American Statistical Association, Survey Methodology Section. American Statistical Association, Alexandria, Va., 2005.
14. Iannacchione V. G. The Changing Role of Address-Based Sampling in Survey Research. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 75, 2011, pp. 556–575.
15. Blumberg S., and Luke J. Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates Based on Data from the National Health Interview Survey, July–December 2007. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/wireless200805.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2012.
16. Link M. W., Battaglia M. P., Frankel M. R., Osborn L., and Mokdad A. H. Reaching the U.S. Cell Phone Generation. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 71, 2007, pp. 814–839.
17. Lachapelle U., Weiner M. D., and Noland R. B. Are Cell Phone Samples Needed for Studies of Walking Activity? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2285, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 56–65.
18. Khattak A. J., and Rodriguez D. Travel Behavior in Neo-Traditional Neighborhood Developments: A Case Study in USA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 481–500.
19. Wang X., Khattak A. J., and Son S. What Can Be Learned from Analyzing University Student Travel Demand? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2322, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 129–137.
20. Son S., Khattak A., Wang X., Agnello P., and Chen J.-Y. Quantifying Key Errors in Household Travel Surveys: Comparison of Random-Digit-Dial Survey and Address-Based Survey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2354, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 9–18, forthcoming.
21. ESRI. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 9. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, Calif., 2011.
22. Schilling M. F. Multivariate Two-Sample Tests Based on Nearest Neighbors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 81, 1986, pp. 799–806.
23. Rizzo M. L. Statistical Computing with R. Chapman and Hall–CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 2008.
24. Corral-Rivas J., Wehenkel C., Castellanos-Bocaz H., Vargas-Larreta B., and Diéguez-Aranda U. A Permutation Test of Spatial Randomness: Application to Nearest Neighbour Indices in Forest Stands. Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 15, 2010, pp. 218–225.
25. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2012. http://www.r-project.org/.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sanghoon Son
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 135 Kaufman Hall, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529.
Asad Khattak
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 135 Kaufman Hall, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529.
Nak-Kyeong Kim
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, 2307 Engineering and Computational Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 12

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Children’s walking to urban services: an analysis of pedestrian access...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Social Media, Web, and Panel Surveys: Using Non‐Probability Samples in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Workshop Synthesis: Comparing and Combining Survey Modes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Use of Subway Smart Card Transactions for the Discovery and Partial Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub