Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Sustainability Trends Measured by the Greenroads Rating System

Abstract

Greenroads, a system used to rate the sustainability of roadway projects, was used to evaluate 105 roadway and bridge projects in the United States for sustainable design and construction practices at various life cycle stages. A sustainability rating system can be a practical tool to help quantify and measure sustainability for a roadway project. The purpose of the investigation was to determine the state of the practice in sustainable roadway design and construction by application of Greenroads to a variety of actual projects. Forty projects identified as sustainable were compared with 65 typical projects representing conventional practice. The objectives of this study were to (a) identify trends in Greenroads project ratings, (b) benchmark the current state of the practice and identify potential areas for improved sustainability performance, (c) determine whether Greenroads can differentiate among projects on the basis of their sustainability efforts, and (d) identify the implications of these findings to practice. The results show that (a) some credits and categories are easily achieved, although achievement of others is more challenging and offers opportunities for improved environmental performance; (b) typical roadway projects tend to meet environmental regulatory standards but rarely do much more even when possible; therefore, they score fewer points for credits that focus on environmental benefits beyond the regulatory minimum; (c) contractors and materials suppliers appear to have unrealized opportunities to contribute; and (d) an early emphasis on the environment during project development appears to differentiate between typical and sustainable projects and manifest as higher Greenroads scores.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Amekudzi A., and Meyer M. NCHRP Report 541: Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.
2. Amekudzi A., Meyer M., Ross C., and Barrella E. Sustainability Evaluation and Planning Guidance for Transportation Systems. Transportation Planning Cooperative Research Board Agency Announcement DTFH61-08-R-00011. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Jan. 2011.
3. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and High Street Consulting Group. SHRP 2 Report S2-C02-RR: Performance Measurement Framework for Highway Capacity Decision Making. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009.
4. Jeon C. M., and Amekudzi A. Addressing Sustainability in Transportation Systems: Definitions, Indicators, and Metrics. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 11, No. 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 31–50.
5. Ramani T. L., Zietsman J., Eisele W., Rosa D., Spillane D., and Bochner B. Developing Sustainable Performance Measures for TxDOT's Strategic Plan. Technical Report 0-5541-1. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, 2009.
6. Zietsman J., Ramani T., Potter J., Reeder V., and DeFlorio J. NCHRP Report 708: A Guidebook for Sustainability Performance Measurement for Transportation Agencies. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.
7. Brown J. and U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Volpe Transportation Research Center. Eco-Logical: An Ecosystem Approach to Developing Infrastructure Projects. Report FHWA-HEP-06-011. Office of Project Development and Environmental Review, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2006.
8. Sustainable Streets 2009 Progress Report. New York City Department of Transportation, 2009. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/about/stratplan.shtml.
9. Illinois Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, Illinois Joint Sustainability Group, American Council of Engineering Companies–Illinois, and Illinois Road and Transportation Builders Association. I-LAST v1.10: Illinois—Livable and Sustainable Transportation, Version 1.01, Rating System and Guide. Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, Jan. 8, 2010.
10. National Complete Streets Coalition. http://www.completestreets.org. Accessed March 1, 2012.
11. Smart Growth Online. http://www.smartgrowth.org/. Accessed Aug. 1, 2011.
12. Sustainable Highways Self-Evaluation Tool. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www.sustainablehighways.org. Accessed March 5, 2012.
13. GreenLITES (Green Leadership in Transportation Environmental Sustainability). New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, 2008. https://www.nysdot.gov/programs/greenlites.
14. LEED for Neighborhood Development Rating System. U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, D.C., 2010.
15. The Greenroads Rating System. Greenroads, Redmond, Wash. http://www.greenroads.org. Accessed Nov. 15, 2012.
16. Envision 2.0. Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure, Washington, D.C. http://sustainableinfrastructure.org/index.cfm. Accessed March 16, 2012.
17. Burkhardt T., Caudill J., Forney C., Hesse E., Horton P., Hoyt S., Hurley P., Ransom M., Rodgers K., Serres S., Winter C. and the Washington State Department of Transportation Commute Trip Reduction Board and Staff. STARS—Sustainable Transportation Access Rating System. Proc. 2010 Northwest Transportation Conference, Feb. 9, 2010. http://www.ci.corvallis.or.us/council/mail-archive/mayor/doc2PTGtD7eOA.doc.
18. Anderson J. L. Measuring Sustainability in Civil Engineering: Development, Testing and Implementation of the Greenroads Rating System. PhD dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle, 2012.
19. Muench S. T., Scarsella M., Bradway M., Hormann L., and Cornell L. Evaluating Project-Based Roadway Sustainability Rating System for Public Agency Use. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2285, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 8–18.
20. Muench S. T., Armstrong A., and Allen B. Sustainable Roadway Design and Construction in Federal Lands Highway Program. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2171, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 19–30.
21. Muench S. T., Anderson J. L., Hatfield J., Koester J., Söderlund M., Weiland C., Watkins K., Vichitthavong D., Phok M., Scarsella M., Lampert S., Peterson E., Hoffman C., Jones N., Knight A., Ramirez E., Lin Y., Prigge P., Bae J. W., Liberty R., Shabir A., Gagliano A., Sahl A., McIntyre K., Peyroux J., Veeravigrom M., Bevan T., Seskin S., Schwartz M., Hull K., Guenther J., Barber S., Pitzler D., Senner R., Blair C., Elliott A., Davis A., Peterson D., Cyra-Korsgaard L., Mader S., Mudgett R., Wagner D., Caley G., Brown L., Bloomberg L., and Penney K. Greenroads Manual v1.5 (Anderson J. L., and Weiland C. D., eds.), University of Washington, Seattle, Feb. 4, 2011.
22. Anderson J. L. The Statistics of Sustainability: Applying the Greenroads Rating System in 42 Case Studies. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
23. Muench S. T., Anderson J. L., and Söderlund M. Greenroads: A Sustainability Performance Metric for Roadways. Journal of Green Building, Vol. 5, 2010, No. 2, pp. 114–128.
24. Muench S. T., Anderson J. L., and Bevan T. Greenroads: A Sustainability Performance Metric for Roadways. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
25. Muench S. T., Anderson J. L., and Söderlund M. Greenroads: Development of a Sustainability Rating System for Roadways. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
26. Söderlund M., Muench S. T., Willoughby K., Uhlmeyer J., and Weston J. Green Roads: A Sustainability Rating System for Roadways. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
27. Söderlund M. Sustainable Roadway Design: A Model for an Environmental Rating System. MSCE thesis. University of Washington, Seattle, 2007.
28. FHWA Functional Classification Guidelines. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2000. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/fcsec2_1.htm. Accessed Jan. 18, 2012.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jeralee L. Anderson
Greenroads Foundation, Suite 200, 8201 164th Avenue NE, Redmond, WA 98052.
Stephen T. Muench
Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 132

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 18

  1. Evaluating the Renewal Degree for Expressway Regeneration Projects Bas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Using construction data and whole life cycle assessment to establish s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Analysis of key factors influencing green highway project development ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Does Sustainable Transport Deliver Societal Value? Exploring Concepts,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Integrating 3D modeling, sustainability and cost estimating at the con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. A sustainability-oriented framework for the application of industrial ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Comparative analysis of traffic-and-transportation-planning-related in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. A critical review of roadway sustainable rating systems
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Development of LCA benchmarks for Austrian torrent control structures
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. A review on green economy and development of green roads and highways ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Consistency between Infrastructure Rating Systems in Measuring Sustain...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Social Considerations in Selection of Sustainable Pavement Designs
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Strategy of indicator incorporation for roadway sustainability certifi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Evaluation of Road Transportation Sustainability
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Sustainability rating tools for highway projects: the nature and outco...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Informing Roadway Sustainability Practices by Using Greenroads Certifi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Sustainability Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Revi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Sustainable design indicators: Roadway project as an example
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub