Evaluating Sustainability Approaches of Transportation Agencies through a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Framework
Abstract
A national survey of state departments of transportation (DOTs) indicated that such agencies were engaged in a variety of activities to address sustainability issues associated with transportation planning, design, and operations. These activities ranged from piecemeal environmental practices such as roadside mowing policies to comprehensive planning frameworks. However, state DOTs in general did not have sufficient policies or practices in place to evaluate and prioritize investment options that would promote environmental sustainability and sustainable development. For this research, a mixed-methods design that used an expert panel and case studies of individual state DOTs was used to develop, test, and evaluate a strategic planning tool that could help DOTs evolve more sustainable practices. The self-assessment tool was designed to guide agencies through the identification of internal strengths and weaknesses in their planning frameworks and organizational structure and culture, characterization of features of the external environment as opportunities or threats, prioritization of areas for strategy development, and development of strategies that link the internal and external environments. Such a tool can also be used to monitor progress over time. The tool was tested by seven state DOTs. Three prominent themes were revealed: the importance of process in addition to content, integration between sustainability policies and implementation, and internal communication of the need and nature of change. The results of this study and of previous research suggest that the sustainability approaches of DOTs are at various levels of maturity and the compartmentalization of sustainability within the organizations is characteristic of earlier maturity levels.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Transportation Planning for Sustainability Guidebook. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011.
2. Counsell D. Sustainable Development and Structure Plans in England and Wales: Operationalizing the Themes and Principles. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1999, pp. 45–61.
3. Sustainable Transportation Practices in Europe. Study Tour Team, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. 2001.
4. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1987.
5. Chambers N., Simmons C., and Wackernagel M. Sharing Nature's Interest. Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability. Earthscan, London, 2000.
6. Benfield F. K., and Replogle M. The Roads More Traveled: Sustainable Transportation in America—Or Not. Environmental Law Reporter, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2002, pp. 10633–10647. http://www.eli.org. Accessed Dec. 16, 2006.
7. Hinchman L., and Hinchman S. “Deep Ecology” and the Revival of Natural Right. The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 3, 1989, pp. 201–228.
8. Khisty C. J. Meditations on Systems Thinking, Spiritual Systems, and Deep Ecology. Systematic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 19, 2006, pp. 295–307.
9. Ayres R., van den Bergh J., and Gowdy J. Viewpoint: Weak Versus Strong Sustainability. Paper no. 98-103/3. In Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1998. http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:dgr:uvatin:19980103.
10. Neumayer E. Weak Versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, 3rd ed. Edward Elgar, Northampton, Mass., 2010.
11. Khisty C. J. Soft Systems as a Learning and Management Tool. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 121, No. 3, 1995, pp. 91–107.
12. Checkland P. B. Systems Thinking in Management: The Development of Soft Systems Methodology and Its Implications for Social Sciences. In Self-Organization and Management of Social Systems: Insights, Promises, Doubts, and Questions (Ulrich H., and Probst G. J. B., eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.
13. Jackson M. C. Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences. Plenum Publishing Corp., London, 1991.
14. Burke W. Organization Change: Theory and Practice, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2011.
15. Hatch M. Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives. Oxford University Press, Bath, United Kingdom, 1997.
16. Staber U., and Sydow J. Organizational Adaptive Capacity: A Structuration Perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2002, pp. 408–424.
17. Beerel A. Leadership Through Strategic Planning. International Thomson Business Press, Boston, Mass., 1998.
18. Bryson J., and Roering W. Applying Private-Sector Strategic Planning in the Public Sector. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 53, No. 1, 1987, pp. 9–22.
19. Kaufman J., and Jacobs H. A Public Planning Perspective on Strategic Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 53, No. 1, 1987, pp. 23–33.
20. Berry F., and Wechsler B. State Agencies’ Experience with Strategic Planning: Findings from a National Survey. Public Administration Review, Vol. 55, No. 2, 1995, pp. 159–168.
21. Cameron J., Canipe H., Secrest C., Poister T., and Daft R. Alternative Organizational Processes in State Departments of Transportation. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2009.
22. Compin N. State DOT Performance Programs: From Program Development to Strategic Planning. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 31, 2008, pp. 616–638.
23. Meyer M. D. Strategic Planning/Management in a State Transportation Agency. Proc. National Conference on Managing Transportation as a Business, Orlando, Fla., ASCE, New York, 1988.
24. Obeng K., and Ugboro I. Effective Strategic Planning in Public Transit Systems. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 44, 2008, pp. 420–439.
25. Poister T. H. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 326: Strategic Planning and Decision Making in State Departments of Transportation. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004.
26. Poister T., and Van Slyke D. Strategic Management Innovations in State Transportation Departments. Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2002, pp. 58–74.
27. Bryson J. M. A Strategic Planning Process for Public and Non-Profit Organizations. Long Range Planning, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1988, pp. 73–81.
28. Koch A. J. SWOT Does Not Need to Be Recalled: It Needs to Be Enhanced. Part 1. Description of the Problem. 2000. http://www.westga.edu/∼bquest/2000/swot1.html. Accessed July 28, 2011.
29. Haberberg A. Swatting SWOT. University of Westminster, London, 2000. http://www2.wmin.ac.uk/haberba/SwatSWOT.htm.
30. Proctor T. Establishing a Strategic Direction: A Review. Management Decision, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1997, pp. 143–154.
31. Weihrich H. The TOWS Matrix—A Tool for Situational Analysis. Long Range Planning, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1982, pp. 52–64.
32. Panagiotou G. Bringing SWOT into Focus. Business Strategy Review, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2003, pp. 8–10.
33. Piercy N., and Giles W. Making SWOT Analysis Work. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 7, No. 5/6, 1989, pp. 5–7.
34. Hill T., and Westbrook R. SWOT Analysis: It's Time for a Product Recall. Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1997, pp. 46–52.
35. Pickton D. W., and Wright S. What's SWOT in Strategic Analysis? Strategic Change, Vol. 7, 1998, pp. 101–109.
36. Valentin E. K. SWOT Analysis from a Resource-Based View. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2001, pp. 54–68.
37. Cresswell J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2009.
38. Cresswell J. W., and Plano Clark V. L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2007.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 79
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 6
- Environmental simulation games for transport workers
- Diffusion of electric vehicles in Brazil from the stakeholders' perspe...
- An application of fuzzy factor analysis for sustainable bridge mainten...
- Promotion of active transportation among state departments of transpor...
- Organizational sustainability in transportation planning: Evaluation o...
- Building a Metaframework for Sustainable Transport Indicators...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
