Who Does the Shopping?: Evidence of German Time Use from 1996 to 2009
Abstract
The labor force participation rate of women and men in industrialized countries is converging, but disparities in participation in unpaid activities nevertheless remain. Shopping for household maintenance is a time-consuming out-of-home activity that continues to be undertaken primarily by women, regardless of their employment status. The present study uses panel methods to analyze, descriptively and econometrically, gender disparities in shopping behavior of couples through the use of data from the German Mobility Panel for 1996 to 2009. Although women were still found to shop more than men, the evidence indicated that the differential narrowed in recent years, particularly in couples with children. Several individual and household characteristics were found to be significant determinants of shopping behavior, whereby employment status and children emerged to be the most important single factors. In addition, the possession of a driver's license, coupled with unrestricted car availability, increased the amount of time that each partner spent shopping.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Burda M., Hamermesh D. S., and Weil P. Total Work and Gender: Facts and Possible Explanations. Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 26, 2013, pp. 239–261.
2. Statistisches Bundesamt (DESTATIS). Zeitbudgeterhebung 2001/02. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Meta/AbisZ/Zeitbudgeterhebung.html. Accessed July 15, 2012.
3. Statistisches Bundesamt (DESTATIS). Results from the Microzensus. https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesamtwirtschaftUmwelt/Arbeitsmarkt/Erwerbstaetigkeit/Arbeitskraefteerhebung/ArbeitskraefteerhebungMikrozensus.html. Accessed July 23, 2012.
4. Jansen A., Kümmerling A., and Lehndorff S. Unterschiede in den Beschäftigungs- und Arbeitszeitstrukturen in Ost- und Westdeutschland: IAQ/HBS Arbeitszeit-Monitor 2001 bis 2006. IAQ report 2009-03. Institut für Arbeit und Qualifikation, Duisburg, Germany.
5. Statistisches Bundesamt (DESTATIS). Bevölkerung Deutschlands bis 2050, 11. koordinierte Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung, 2006.
6. Pas E. I. Weekly Travel–Activity Behavior. Transportation, Vol. 15, 1988, pp. 89–109.
7. Bowman J. L., and Ben-Akiva M. Activity-Based Disaggregate Travel Demand Model System with Activity Schedules. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 35, 2000, pp. 1–28.
8. Hanson S., and Huff J. O. Systematic Variability in Repetitious Travel. Transportation, Vol. 15, 1988, pp. 111–135.
9. Hirsh M., Prashker J. N., and Ben-Akiva M. Dynamic Model of Weekly Activity Pattern. Transportation Science, Vol. 20, 1986, pp. 24–36.
10. Yun D.-S., and O'Kelly M. E. Modeling the Day-of-the-Week Shopping Activity and Travel Patterns. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1997, pp. 307–319.
11. Steiner R. Women's Travel for Shopping in Traditional Neighborhoods: How Does a Woman's Role in the Household Affect Their Activity and Travel for Shopping? Proc., Second National Conference on Woman's Travel Issues, Baltimore, Md., 2000, pp. 299–313.
12. Niemeier D. A., and Morita J. G. Duration of Trip-Making Activities by Men and Women. Transportation, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1996, pp. 353–371.
13. Hersch J., and Stratton L. S. Housework, Wages, and the Division of Housework Time for Employed Spouses. American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, 1994, pp. 120–125.
14. Fagnani J. Women's Commuting Patterns in the Paris Region. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 74, 1983, pp. 12–24.
15. The German Mobility Panel. http://mobilitaetspanel.ifv.uni-karlsruhe.de/. Accessed Nov. 12, 2010.
16. Statistisches Bundesamt (DESTATIS). Geburten in Deutschland 2012. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Bevoelkerung/Bevoelkerungsbewegung/BroschuereGeburtenDeutschland0120007129004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
17. Kiker B. F., and Ng Y. C. A Simultaneous Equation Model of Spousal Time Allocation. Social Science Research, Vol. 19, 1990, pp. 132–152.
18. Breusch T. S., and Pagan A. R. A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation. Econometrica, Vol. 47, 1979, pp. 1287–1294.
19. Handy S. L., and Clifton K. J. Local Shopping as a Strategy for Reducing Automobile Travel. Transportation, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2001, pp. 317–346.
20. Lois D., and López-Séez M. The Relationship Between Instrumental, Symbolic and Affective Factors as Predictors of Car Use: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 43, No. 9-10, 2009, pp. 790–799.
21. Jiao J., Moudon A. V., and Drewnowski A. Grocery Shopping: How Individuals and Built Environments Influence Choice of Travel Mode. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2230, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 85–95.
22. Jappelli T., and Pistaferri L. The Consumption Response to Income Changes. Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 2, 2010, pp. 479–506.
23. Statistisches Bundesamt (DESTATIS). Informationsgesellschaft in Deutschland, Ausgabe 2009.
24. Visser E. J., and Lanzendorf M. Mobility and Accessibility Effects of b2c e-Commerce: A Literature Survey. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 95, No. 2, 2004, pp. 189–205.
25. Farag S., Schwanen T., Dijst M., and Faber J. Shopping Online and/or in Store? A Structural Equation Model of the Relationships Between e-Shopping and In-Store Shopping. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2007, pp. 125–141.
26. Cao X. J., Xu Z., and Douma F. The Interactions Between e-Shopping and Traditional In-Store Shopping: An Application of Structural Equations Model. Transportation, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2012, pp. 957–974.
27. Hsiao M.-H. Shopping Mode Choice: Physical Store Shopping Versus e-Shopping. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2009, pp. 86–95.
28. Morrill M. S., and Pabilonia S. W. What Effects do Macroeconomic Conditions Have on Families’ Time Together? IZA discussion paper 6529. Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn, Germany, 2012.
29. Aguiar M., Hurst E., and Karabarbounis L. Time Use During Recessions. NBER working paper 17259. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass., 2011.
30. Berik G., and Kongar E. Time Use of Mothers and Fathers in Hard Times: The US Recession of 2007–09. Working paper 726. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, N.Y., 2012.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 28
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 1
- The effectiveness of advice and actions in reducing food waste
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
