Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Decision Tool to Define and Quantify Interchange Complexity

Abstract

Because complexity typically is a qualitative characteristic, the ability to evaluate the complexity of an interchange objectively is somewhat difficult. This difficulty is compounded when trying to compare the complex features of multiple interchanges. A spreadsheet-based decision tool that was developed as a method for the quantification and comparison of the complexity of freeway interchanges in the United States is discussed. The initial discussion focuses on the steps that guided researchers in the development of the spreadsheet, and this discussion is followed by a description of the spreadsheet itself and how practitioners can use it to evaluate the complexity of interchanges under their consideration. A review is provided of the results researchers obtained with the spreadsheet in an evaluation of the complexity of 28 existing interchanges in 11 states. These study sites ranged from relatively simple to complex, and results indicated that the spreadsheet-generated scores were generally consistent with researchers’ qualitative estimates of the sites’ relative complexity. The meaning and interpretation of the spreadsheet results are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Chrysler S. T., Williams A., Funkhouser D. S., Holick A. J., and Brewer M. A. Driver Comprehension of Diagrammatic Freeway Guide Signs. Research report 5147-1. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2007.
2. Somers R. A., Hawkins H. G., Jasek D. L., and Urbanik T. Evaluation of Guide Signing at Right Multilane Freeway Exits with Optional Lanes. Research report 0-1467-5. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 1996.
3. Ullman B. R., Finley M. D., Chrysler S. T., Trout N. D., Nelson A. A., and Young S. Guidelines for the Use of Pavement Marking Symbols at Freeway Interchanges: Final Report. FHWA/TX-10/05890-1. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2010. http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-5890-1.pdf.
4. Fitzpatrick K., Lienau T. K., Ogden M. A., Lance M. T., and Urbanik T. Freeway Exit Lane Drops in Texas. Research report 0-1292-1F. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 1993.
5. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2009.
6. Upchurch J., Fisher D. L., and Waraich B. Guide Signing of Two-Lane Exits with an Option Lane: Evaluation of Human Factors. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1918, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 35–45.
7. Leisch J. P. Freeway and Interchange Geometric Design Handbook. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., 2003.
8. Ray B. L., Schoen J., Jenior P., Knudsen J., Porter R. J., Leisch J. P., Mason J., and Roess R. NCHRP Report 687: Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.
9. Sadia R., and Polus A. Modeling Interchange Complexity and Its Effect on Safety. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
10. Fitzpatrick K., Chrysler S. T., Brewer M. A., Nelson A., and Iragavarapu V. Simulator Study of Signs for a Complex Interchange and Complex Interchange Spreadsheet Tool. Research report FHWA-HRT-13-047. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2013.
11. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Marcus A. Brewer
Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3135.
Kay Fitzpatrick
Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3135.
Susan T. Chrysler
National Advanced Driving Simulator, University of Iowa, 2401 Oakdale Boulevard, Iowa City, IA 52242-5003.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 8

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Safety Analysis and Countermeasures for System Interchange Operation B...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub