Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Development of Bridge Management Components that Facilitate Decision Making

Abstract

Because of limited funds, a greater demand for use, and continuous deterioration, it is crucial that transportation agencies have effective decision-making processes and tools, such as bridge management systems, to manage agency bridge networks. Given the shortcomings of the current bridge management practices as repeatedly highlighted in the literature, it is evident that a decision process that only involves a single rating or index, such as the sufficiency rating or the bridge health index, is inadequate for bridge management. Therefore, there is a clear need to pursue and develop supplemental bridge management practices. The primary contribution of this research is to provide engineers, managers, and decision makers with effective bridge management components that have well-defined goals and related items. Additionally, these components clearly identify and distinguish differences in bridge attributes that may go unnoticed when a single criterion is used. Transportation agencies may use these bridge management components in a variety of ways to complement current bridge management practices; this usage may better illustrate the performance of the agencies’ bridges. The specific objectives of this research are (a) to identify the appropriate items that make up each of the aforementioned components and (b) to determine the relative importance of those items, as represented by weighting factors. To achieve these objectives, this research was conducted in two parts, and input was sought from key bridge management personnel, industry professionals, and academics. The first part consisted of a survey; the second part utilized a mathematical method entitled the analytic hierarchy process.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. AASHTO. State DOTs Voice Funding and Policy Goals During U.S. DOT Town Hall. July 16, 2010. http://www.aashtojournal.org/Pages/Archive.aspx. Accessed Sept. 2010.
2. AASHTO. Transportation: Are We There Yet? How to Increase Transportation Revenue. 2009. http://www.transportation1.org/policy_revenue/. Accessed July 15, 2010.
3. Washington State Department of Transportation. Trends in Highway Material Costs. July 13, 2010. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/construction/constructioncosts.cfm. Accessed Sept. 27, 2010.
4. 2008 Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges and Transit: Conditions and Performance. Report to Congress. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.
5. AASHTO. Bridging the Gap: Restoring and Rebuilding the Nation's Bridges. July 2008. http://www.transportation1.org/bridgereport/front-page.html. Accessed July 7, 2010.
6. FHWA. FHWA Bridge Programs NBI Data: Tables of Frequently Requested NBI Information. Dec. 31, 2010. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/britab.cfm. Accessed Oct. 2011.
7. Markow M. J., and Hyman W. A. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 397: Bridge Management Systems for Transportation Agency Decision Making. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009.
8. Bridge Division, Office of Engineering. Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation's Bridges. Report FHWA-PD-96-001. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1995.
9. Office of Asset Management. Transportation Asset Management Case Studies: Bridge Management Experiences of California, Florida and South Dakota. Report FHWA-IF-05-040. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005.
10. Michael Baker, Jr., Inc. Pontis Release 5.1 Technical Manual. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2009.
11. Michael Baker, Jr., Inc.; Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Pontis Release 4.5 and 5.1 User's Manual. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2009.
12. Jiang X., and Rens K. L. Bridge Health Index for the City and County of Denver, Colorado I: Current Methodology. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2010, pp. 580–587.
13. Jiang X., and Rens K. L. Bridge Health Index for the City and County of Denver, Colorado II: Denver Bridge Health Index. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2010, pp. 588–596.
14. AASHTO Guide for Commonly Recognized (CoRe) Elements, 2002 Interim Revisions. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001.
15. AASHTO Guide Manual for Bridge Element Inspection, 1st ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2011.
16. Saaty T. L., and Vargas L. G. Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass., 2001.
17. Harker P. T. The Art and Science of Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. In The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies (Golden B. L., Wasil E. A., and Harker P. T., eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989, pp. 3–36.
18. Saaty T. L. Group Decision Making and the AHP. In The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies (Golden B. L., Wasil E. A., and Harker P. T., eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989, pp. 59–67.
19. Saaty T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
20. Saaty T. L. How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Interfaces, Vol. 24, No. 6, 1994, pp. 19–43.
21. Saaty T. L., and Aczel J. Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 27, 1983, pp. 93–102.
22. Cycyota C. S., and Harrison D. A. What (Not) to Expect When Surveying Executives: A Meta-Analysis of Top Manager Response Rates and Techniques over Time. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2006, pp. 133–160.
23. Johnson J. F., and Ozbek M. E. Determining the Items That Structure Bridge Management Components and Their Relative Weights: Focus on Implementation. Presented at 13th AASHTO/TRB Maintenance Management Conference, Seattle, Wash., 2012.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Joshua F. Johnson
Wyoming Department of Transportation, 5300 Bishop Boulevard, Cheyenne, WY 82001.
Michael Baker Jr., Inc., Suite 200, 165 South Union Boulevard, Lakewood, CO 80228.
Mehmet E. Ozbek
Department of Construction Management, Colorado State University, Guggenheim Hall, Campus Delivery 1584, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1584.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 18

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Application of Fuzzy Preference–Analytic Hierarchy Process Logic in Ev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub