Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Global Sensitivity Analysis of Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement Mechanistic–Empirical Performance Predictions

Abstract

The new AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) provides pavement analysis and performance predictions for various what-if scenarios. MEPDG performance predictions for anticipated climatic and traffic conditions will depend on the values of the input parameters that characterize pavement materials, layers, design features, and condition. A comprehensive global sensitivity analysis methodology is proposed for evaluating performance predictions for jointed plain concrete pavement to MEPDG inputs for five climatic conditions and three traffic levels. MEPDG inputs evaluated in the analysis include traffic volume, layer thicknesses, material properties, groundwater depth, and geometric parameters. Correlations between MEPDG inputs were considered as appropriate. The global sensitivity analysis varied all inputs simultaneously across the problem domain for each of the 15 base cases (five climates x three traffic levels). Two response surface modeling approaches, multivariate linear regressions and artificial neural networks, were developed for evaluation of MEPDG input sensitivities across the problem domain. The response surface modeling approaches based on artificial neural networks not only provided robust and accurate representations of the complex relationships between MEPDG inputs and distress outputs but also captured the variation in sensitivity across the problem domain. The normalized sensitivity index for the design limit proposed in the study provides practical interpretation of sensitivity by relating a given percentage change in an MEPDG design input to the corresponding percentage change in predicted distress relative to its design limit value.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide, Interim Edition: A Manual of Practice. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2008.
2. AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design. 2012. http://www.darwinme.org/MEDesign/Index.html. Accessed Feb. 27, 2013.
3. ARA, Inc., ERES Consultants Division. Guide for Mechanistic–Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. Final report, NCHRP Project 1-37A. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004. http://www.trb.org/mepdg/guide.htm.
4. Schwartz C. W., Li R., Kim S., Ceylan H., and Gopalakrishnan K. Sensitivity Evaluation of MEPDG Performance Prediction. Final report, NCHRP Project 1-47. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011. http://www.trb.org/TRBNet/ProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=2487. Accessed May 29, 2012.
5. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Campolongo F., and Ratto M. Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom, 2004.
6. Cacuci D. G. Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Theory: Volume I. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 2003.
7. Alam M., Fekpeet E., and Majed M. FHWA FAF2 Freight Traffic Analysis Report. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/faf2_reports/reports7/index.htm. Accessed May 29, 2012.
8. Schwartz C. W., and Li R. Sensitivity of Predicted Flexible Pavement Performance to Unbound Material Hydraulic Properties. Proc. Geo-Florida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling, and Design, West Palm Beach, Fla., ASCE, New York, 2010, pp. 2672–2683.
9. Li R., Schwartz C. W., Kim S., and Ceylan H. Local Sensitivity of Mechanistic-Empirical Flexible Pavement Performance Predictions to Unbound Material Property Inputs. Proc. GeoCongress 2012: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering, Oakland, Calif., ASCE, New York, 2012.
10. Stein M. Large Sample Properties of Simulations Using Latin Hypercube Sampling. Technometrics, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1987, pp. 143–151.
11. Iman R. L., and Helton J. C. A Comparison of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models. NUREG/CR-3904. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, N.M., 1985.
12. SimLab Sensitivity Analysis. 2012. http://simlab.jrc.ec.europa.eu. Accessed May 29, 2012.
13. McKay M. D. Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis Using a Statistical Sample of Input Values. In Uncertainty Analysis (Ronen Y., ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1988, pp. 145–186.
14. Manache G. Sensitivity of a Continuous Water-Quality Simulation Model to Uncertain Model Input Parameters. PhD dissertation. Vrije University of Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
15. Graves R. C., and Mahboub K. C. Pilot Study in Sampling-Based Sensitivity Analysis of NCHRP Design Guide for Flexible Pavements. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1947, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 123–135.
16. Ceylan H., Schwartz C. W., Kim S., and Gopalakrishnan K. Accuracy of Predictive Models for Dynamic Modulus of Hot Mix Asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2009, pp. 286–293.
17. Beale M. H., Hagan M. T., and Demuth H. B. Neural Network Toolbox™ User's Guide. MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Mass., 2011. http://www.mathworks.com/help/pdf_doc/nnet/nnet_ug.pdf. Accessed May 29, 2012.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Halil Ceylan
406 Town Engineering Building, Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3232.
Kasthurirangan Gopalakrishnan
354 Town Engineering Building, Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3232.
Sunghwan Kim
24 Town Engineering Building, Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-3232.
Charles W. Schwartz
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, 1173 Glenn L. Martin Hall, College Park, MD 20742.
Rui Li
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, 1173 Glenn L. Martin Hall, College Park, MD 20742.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 50

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 9

  1. Reduction of critical positive temperature gradients in jointed plain ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. ANN Model to Predict Joint Stiffness of White-topped Pavements Using F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Development of a flexible pavement condition index for urban road netw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Exploratory analysis of LTPP faulting data using statistical technique...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Combined effect of compaction level and matric suction conditions on f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Application of Sensitivity Analysis in the Calibration Process of a Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Performance of Different Climate Data Sources in Mechanistic-Empirical...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Sensitivity quantification of airport concrete pavement stress respons...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Alternative Source of Climate Data for Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub