Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Nonlinear Viscoelastic Behavior of Asphalt Concrete and Its Implication for Fatigue Modeling

Abstract

Mechanistic models for asphalt concrete (AC) can consider many different physical mechanisms. However, as more mechanisms are considered, the complexity increases, and it becomes important to balance accuracy and complexity to create a model that can be used by the engineering community. In some cases, the material response is dominated by the effects of only some key processes, and smearing the effects of the minor ones is acceptable. In other cases, many processes are important and need to be considered. In this paper, the importance of modeling the nonlinear viscoelasticity (NLVE) of AC for fatigue response prediction is assessed. Two mechanistic hypotheses are considered for describing this phenomenon: linear viscoelastic with damage and NLVE with damage. The importance of explicitly considering NLVE effects under fatigue loading is evaluated with laboratory tests, the simplified viscoelastic continuum damage (S-VECD) model, and an NLVE form of the S-VECD model. These two models are characterized and used to simulate and compare AC fatigue response under constant and random controlled stress and strain conditions. It is found that while the NLVE-based formulation better represents the material response in random loading and suggests less overall damage accumulation during fatigue, the two models predict similar amounts of modulus reduction. The primary conclusion from this study is that because the goal for fatigue assessment is to find the change in modulus over a long period of time, fatigue response modeling of AC does not need to explicitly consider NLVE.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Rao Tangella S. C. S., Craus J., Deacon J. A., and Monismith C. L. SHRP Report A-312: Summary Report on Fatigue Response of Asphalt Mixtures. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990.
2. Christensen D. W., and Bonaquist R. Analysis of HMA Fatigue Data Using the Concepts of Reduced Loading Cycles and Endurance Limit. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 78, 2009, pp. 377–416.
3. Darabi M. K., Abu Al-Rub R. K., and Little D. N. A Continuum Damage Mechanics Framework for Modeling Micro-Damage Healing. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 49, No. 3-4, 2012, pp. 492–513.
4. Hou E. T., Underwood B. S., and Kim Y. R. Fatigue Performance Prediction of North Carolina Mixtures Using the Simplified Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 79, 2010, pp. 35–80.
5. Levenberg E., and Uzan J. Triaxial Small-Strain Viscoelastic-Viscoplastic Modeling of Asphalt Aggregate Mixes. Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2004, pp. 365–384.
6. Mbarki R., Kutay M. E., Gibson N., and Abbas A. R. Comparison Between Fatigue Performance of Horizontal Cores from Different Asphalt Pavement Depths and Laboratory Specimens. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2012, pp. 422–432.
7. Underwood B. S., Baek C., and Kim Y. R. Simplified Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model as Platform for Asphalt Concrete Fatigue Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2296, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 36–45.
8. Western Research Institute. Asphalt Research Consortium: Quarterly Technical Progress Report July 1–September 30, 2007. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.
9. Lesueur D. The Colloidal Structure of Bitumen: Consequences on the Rheology and on the Mechanisms of Bitumen Modification. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 145, No. 1-2, 2009, pp. 42–82.
10. Bahia H. U., and Delgadillo R. The Relationship Between Non-linearity of Asphalt Binders and Asphalt Mixture Permanent Deformation. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2010, pp. 653–680.
11. Delgadillo R. A., Cho D. W., and Bahia H. U. Nonlinearity of Repeated Creep and Recovery Binder Test and Relationship with Mixture Permanent Deformation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1962, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 3–11.
12. Judycki J. Non-Linear Viscoelastic Behaviour of Conventional and Modified Asphaltic Concrete Under Creep. Materials and Structures, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1992, pp. 95–101.
13. Saadeh S. A. Characterization of Asphalt Concrete Using Anisotropic Damage Viscoelastic-Viscoplastic Model. PhD dissertation. Texas A&M University, College Station, 2005.
14. Uzan J., and Levenberg E. Advanced Testing and Characterization of Asphalt Concrete Materials in Tension. ASCE International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2007, pp. 158–165.
15. Park S. Development of a Nonlinear Thermo-Viscoelastic Constitutive Equation for Particulate Composites with Growing Damage. PhD dissertation. University of Texas at Austin, 1994.
16. Schapery R. A. On the Characterization of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Materials. Polymer Engineering and Science, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1969, pp. 295–310.
17. Kim Y. R., Guddati M. N., Underwood B. S., Yun T. Y., Subramanian V., and Savadatti S. Development of a Multiaxial Viscoelastoplastic Continuum Damage Model for Asphalt Mixtures. Report FHWA-HRT-08-073. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009.
18. Underwood B. S., and Kim Y. R. Comprehensive Evaluation of Small Strain Viscoelastic Behavior of Asphalt Concrete. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2012, pp. 622–632.
19. Underwood B. S., Kim Y. R., and Guddati M. N. Characterization and Performance Prediction of ALF Mixtures Using a Viscoelastoplastic Continuum Damage Model. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 75, 2006, pp. 577–636.
20. Bodin D., Belzung F., de La Roche C., and Chabot A. Thermomechanical Modelling for Fatigue Damage of Bituminous Materials. Proc. 5th International RILEM Conference on Reflective Cracking in Pavements, Limoges, France, 2004, pp. 675–682.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

B. Shane Underwood
School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, 229B ISTB 2, 850 South McAllister Avenue, Tempe, AZ 85287-5306.
Y. Richard Kim
Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, 210 Mann Hall, 2501 Stinson Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7908.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 47

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 13

  1. Ruggedness Evaluation of Dynamic Modulus Test Using Small-Scale Test S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Asphalt mixture fatigue damage and failure predictions using the simpl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A proposed approach for accurate fatigue quantification of the base as...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Linear viscoelasticity and fatigue life: Relationships between propert...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A more accurate fatigue characterization of GO-modified asphalt binder...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Toward to a viscoelastic fatigue and fracture model for asphalt binder...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Simplified protocol for fatigue cracking characterization of asphalt m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Analytical modelling of thixotropy contribution during T/C fatigue tes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Evaluation of the Specific Surface Method as a Tool to Determine the B...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Modeling shear stress response of bituminous materials under small and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Aging-Effect Incorporation into the Fatigue-Damage Modeling of Asphalt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Fatigue Performance Prediction of Asphalt Composites Subjected to Cycl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Quantifying overall damage and healing behaviour of asphalt materials ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub