Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Characterization of Opposite-Direction Road Departure Crashes in the United States

Abstract

Opposite-direction crashes can be extremely severe because opposing vehicles often have high relative speeds. The objective of this study was to characterize the overall frequency of opposite-direction crashes as well as the frequency of crashes involving fatalities and serious injuries. The results of the study will guide future research and investment in infrastructure-based countermeasures to opposite-direction crashes, such as centerline rumble strips. The study used data from the National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) General Estimates System for 2010, the NASS Crashworthiness Data System for 2006 to 2010, and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System for 2010. The most common opposite-direction crash scenario was a driver departing the road driving over the centerline or the road edge to the left, which accounted for only 5% of nonjunction vehicle-to-vehicle crashes but 44% of serious injury and 49% of fatal crashes of the same type. Of the cross-over-to-left crashes, 72% of fatal crashes occurred on rural, undivided, two-lane roads and accounted for 1,659 fatal crashes in 2010. In cross-over-to-left crashes on rural two-lane roads, the driver was going straight or negotiating a curve in 88% to 94% of the crashes. The driver was overtaking another vehicle in only 2% of serious injury crashes and 6% of fatal crashes. Cross-over-to-left crashes on curves were to the outside of the curve more often than to the inside of the curve. This research suggests that countermeasures to opposite-direction crashes should focus on rural two-lane roads.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2005.
2. Neuman T. R., Pfefer R., Slack K. L., Hardy K. K., McGee H., Prothe L., Eccles K., and Council F. NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Volume 4: A Guide for Addressing Head-on Collisions. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
3. Sawyer M., Fiedler R., Nabors D., McGee H., Miller J., and Barrington M. A Focused Approach to Safety Guidebook. Report FHWA-SA-11-44. Office of Safety, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011.
4. Torbic D. J., Hutton J. M., Bokenkroger C. D., Bauer K. M., Harwood D. W., Gilmore D. K., Dunn J. M., Ronchetto J. J., Donnell E. T., Sommer H. J. III, Garvey P. M., Persaud B., and Lyon C. NCHRP Report 641: Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009.
5. Torbic D. J., Hutton J. M., Bokenkroger C. D., Bauer K. M., Donnell E. T., Lyon C., and Persaud B. Guidance on Design and Application of Rumble Strips. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2149, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 59–69.
6. Finley M. D., Funkhouser D. S., and Brewer M. A. Studies to Determine the Operational Effects of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips on Two-lane Undivided Roadways. Report FHWA/TX-09/0-5577-1. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2009.
7. Noyce D. A., and Dulaski D. Development of a Unique Centerline Rumble Strip Pattern to Improve Driver Comprehension. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
8. Coburn J. S., Chitturi M. V., Bill A. R., and Noyce D. A. Injury Outcomes and Costs for Cross-Median, Median Barrier, Median Entry, and Run-off-the-Road Crashes. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
9. Chitturi M. V., Ooms A. W., Bill A. R., and Noyce D. A. Injury Outcomes and Costs for Cross-Median and Median Barrier Crashes. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 42, 2011, pp. 87–92.
10. Hu W., and Donnell E. T. Median Barrier Crash Severity: Some New Insights. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1697–1704.
11. Cooner S. A., Rathod Y. K., Alberson D. C., Bligh R. P., Ranft S. E., and Sun D. Performance Evaluation of Cable Median Barrier Systems in Texas. Report FHWA/TX-09/0-5609-1. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2009.
12. Villwock N., Blond N., and Tarko A. Cable Barriers and Traffic Safety on Rural Interstates. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 4, 2011, pp. 248–259.
13. Sicking D. L., de Albuquerque F. D. B., Lechtenberg K. A., and Stolle C. S. Guidelines for Implementation of Cable Median Barrier. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2120, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 82–90.
14. NCHRP Research Results Digest No. 275: Application of European 2+1 Roadway Designs. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
15. National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA). NHTSA. http://www.nhtsa.gov/NCSA. Accessed July 28, 2012.
16. Gennareli T. A., and Wodzin E. AIS 2005. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Barrington, Ill., 2005.
17. 2010 FARS/NASS GES Standardization. Report DOT HS 811 564. NHTSA, Washington, D.C., 2011.
18. May W. L., and Johnson W. D. A SAS Macro for Constructing Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Multinomial Proportions. Computational Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1997, pp. 153–162.
19. Goodman L. A. On Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Multinomial Proportions. Technometrics, Vol. 7, No. 2, May 1965, pp. 247–254.
20. NASS GES Analytical User's Manual 1988–2010. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
21. Highway Statistics 2009. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
22. Machas B., Glad R. W., Sujka M., and Olson D. Performance Analysis of Centerline Rumble Strips in Washington State. Report WA-RD-746.1. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kristofer D. Kusano
Room 440, School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Kelly Hall, Stanger Street (MC 0194), Blacksburg, VA 24061-0194.
Hampton C. Gabler
Room 445, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Kelly Hall, Stanger Street (MC 0194), Blacksburg, VA 24061-0194.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 46

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 11

  1. Comparing the key contributory factors for driver injury severities in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Impact of event encoding and dissimilarity measures on traffic crash c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. An interpretable prediction model of illegal running into the opposite...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Injury severity analysis of time-of-day fluctuations and temporal vola...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Identifying roadway departure crash patterns on rural two-lane highway...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Analysis of Roadway Segment Vulnerability and Risk Factors for Crashes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Analysis of distracted driving crashes in New Jersey using mixed logit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Investigation of injury severities in single-vehicle crashes in North ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Traffic Safety Benefit of A Lane Departure Warning System
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Performance Evaluation of a Cable Median Barrier System on an Oregon H...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Test Scenarios, Equipment and Testing Process for LDW LDP Performance ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub