Sustainable Biofuel Supply Chain Planning and Management under Uncertainty
Abstract
The concept of environmental thinking is integrated into sustainable supply chain planning and management for biofuels, and a multiobjective modeling framework is developed. The aim is to seek best-compromise solutions that are economically and environmentally sustainable in supplying biofuels from cellulosic biomasses while satisfying demand, resource, and technology constraints. The least-cost objective and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions are integrated into the modeling framework, and carbon footprints are assessed with the Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation model, a life-cycle assessment framework, to ensure that strategies to mitigate GHG emissions are factored into system planning and management. Biomass-to-biofuel conversion efficiency can be highly variable because of uncertainties inherent in the conversion processes; this uncertainty is considered explicitly in the integrated modeling framework. A multi-objective, mixed-integer, stochastic programming model is proposed and solved by the compromise method, a subclass of the goal programming method. The model is used to evaluate the economic potential and environmental impact of establishing a cellulosic ethanol supply chain based on biowaste (i.e., corn stover and forest residue) in California as a case study. Significant trade-offs exist between economic competitiveness and environmental quality. The uncertainty inherent in biomass-to-biofuel conversion technology has substantial effects on multicriteria decision making, and the effects may vary with the choice of modeling approaches.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Awudu I., and Zhang J. Uncertainties and Sustainability Concepts in Bio-fuel Supply Chain Management: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2012, pp. 1359–1368.
2. Naik S. N., Goud V. V., Rout P. K., and Dalai A. K. Production of First and Second Generation Biofuels: A Comprehensive Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2010, pp. 578–597.
3. Hill J., Nelson E., Tilman D., Polasky S., and Tiffany D. Environmental, Economic, and Energetic Costs and Benefits of Biodiesel and Ethanol Biofuels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 103, No. 30, 2006, pp. 11206–11210.
4. Farrell A. E., Plevin R. J., Turner B. T., Jones A. D., O'Hare M., and Kammen D. M. Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals. Science, Vol. 311, No. 5760, 2006, pp. 506–508.
5. Perlack R. D., Wright L. L., Turhollow A. F., Graham R. L., Stokes B. J., and Erbach D. C. Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., 2005.
6. Jenkins B., Parker N., Tittmann P., Hart Q., Cunningham J., and Lay M. Strategic Assessment of Bioenergy Development in the West, Task 3: Spatial Analysis and Supply Curve Development. Western Governors' Association, Washington, D.C., 2008.
7. Parker N. Optimizing the Design of Biomass Hydrogen Supply Chains Using Real-World Spatial Distributions: A Case Study Using California Rice Straw. Master's thesis, University of California, Davis, 2007.
8. Ekşioğlu S. D., Li S., Zhang S., Sokhansanj S., and Petrolia D. Analyzing Impact of Intermodal Facilities on Design and Management of Biofuel Supply Chain. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2191, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 144–151.
9. Ekşioğlu S. D., Acharya A., Leightley L. E., and Arora S. Analyzing the Design and Management of Biomass-to-Biorefinery Supply Chain. Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1342–1352.
10. Acharya A. M., Ekşioğlu S. D., and Petrolia D. In-Bound Supply Chain Design for Biomass-to-Ethanol Industry: A Study of Mississippi. Presented at 2008 Institute of Industrial Engineers Annual Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2008.
11. Gunnarsson H., Rönnqvist M., and Lundgren J. T. Supply Chain Modelling of Forest Fuel. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 158, No. 1, 2004, pp. 103–123.
12. Huang Y., Chen C.-W., and Fan Y. Multistage Optimization of the Supply Chains of Biofuels. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 46, No. 6, 2010, pp. 820–830.
13. Wang M., Wu Y., and Elgowainy A. Operating Manual for GREET: Version 1.7. ANL/ESD/05-3. Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill., 2005.
14. Hendrickson C., Horvath A., Joshi S., and Lave L. Peer Reviewed: Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 32, No. 7, 1998, pp. 184A–191A.
15. Chen W., Wiecek M. M., and Zhang J. Quality Utility: A Compromise Programming Approach to Robust Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 121, No. 2, 1999, pp. 179–187.
16. Tamiz M., Jones D., and Romero C. Goal Programming for Decision Making: An Overview of the Current State-of-the-Art. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 111, No. 3, 1998, pp. 569–581.
17. Unsihuay-Vila C., Marangon-Lima J. W., Zambroni de Souza A. C., and Perez-Arriaga I. J. Multistage Expansion Planning of Generation and Interconnections with Sustainable Energy Development Criteria: A Multiobjective Model. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2011, pp. 258–270.
18. Linares P., and Romero C. A Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach for Electricity Planning in Spain: Economic Versus Environmental Objectives. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 51, No. 6, 2000, pp. 736–743.
19. Chen C.-W., and Fan Y. Bioethanol Supply Chain System Planning Under Supply and Demand Uncertainties. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2012, pp. 150–164.
20. Cundiff J. S., Dias N., and Sherali H. D. A Linear Programming Approach for Designing a Herbaceous Biomass Delivery System. Bio-resource Technology, Vol. 59, No. 1, 1997, pp. 47–55.
21. De La Torre Ugarte D. G., and Ray D. E. Biomass and Bioenergy Applications of the Polysys Modeling Framework. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2000, pp. 291–308.
22. Biomass Multi-Year Program Plan. Biomass Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, 2009.
23. Pas 2050: 2011 Specification for the Assessment of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods and Services. British Standards Institution, London, 2011.
24. Raphael S., Ausilio B., and Nilay S. The Greenhouse Gas Emissions Performance of Cellulosic Ethanol Supply Chains in Europe. Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 2, 2009. http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/content/2/1/15. Accessed Feb. 25, 2013.
25. Brinkman N., Wang M., Weber T., and Darlington T. Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems: A North American Study of Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Criteria Pollutant Emissions. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill., 2005.
26. Birge J. R., and Louveaux F. Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Springer, New York, 1997.
27. Saaty T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw Hill International, New York, 1980.
28. Fourer R., Gay D., and Kernighan B. AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming. Duxbury Press, Boston, Mass., 2003.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 62
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 7
- How to Measure Sustainability in the Supply Chain Design: An Integrate...
- Designing a GIS‐based supply chain for pro...
- Digital Technologies for Forest Supply Chain Optimization: Existing So...
- Supply Chain Design and Management for Syngas Production
- Stochastic optimization of sustainable industrial symbiosis based hybr...
- Stochastic optimization of sustainable hybrid generation bioethanol su...
- Evaluating Supply Chain Design Models for the Integration of Biomass C...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
