Built Environment and Household Electric Bike Ownership: Insights from Zhongshan Metropolitan Area, China
Abstract
Planners and policy makers have recognized the effects of the built environment on vehicle ownership and use. Within the voluminous literature, however, few studies have examined how the built environment was associated with household electric bike (e-bike) ownership. This study explored the relationship between the built environment and household e-bike ownership in the Chinese context, on the basis of data collected in the Zhongshan Metropolitan Area. The e-bike choice models suggested that household measures dominated the number of household e-bikes, but the models also detected a relationship between several built environment attributes and household e-bike ownership. All else being equal, denser and higher mixed land use development, more connective transportation links, and accessibility to commerce and jobs were related to lower household e-bike ownership. Households located in urban neighborhoods tended to own fewer e-bikes than those in suburban or rural areas. The availability of competitive transportation modes was strongly related to the likelihood of e-bike ownership. The results suggested that policy makers should consider built environment attributes with respect to policies on e-bike ownership and set different policies in different areas according to the variations in the built environments. The findings also suggested that e-bike ownership policies should be integrated with ownership policies on competitive modes and with policies related to public transportation service improvement.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Zegras P. C. Transport and Land Use in China. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2010, pp. 1–3.
2. Ding C., and Song Y. Emerging Land and Housing Markets in China. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, Mass., 2005.
3. Weinert J. X., Ma C., Yang X., and Cherry C. R. Electric Two-Wheelers in China: Effect on Travel Behavior, Mode Shift, and User Safety Perceptions in a Medium-Sized City. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2038, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 62–68.
4. Yang C. J. Launching Strategy for Electric Vehicles: Lessons from China and Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 77, No. 5, 2010, pp. 831–834.
5. Hu J. The Electric Ownership in China Is Over 140 Million. http://news.xinhuanet.com/-city/2012-04/28/c_123052799.htm. Accessed July 31, 2012.
6. Dill J., and Rose G. Electric Bikes and Transportation Policy: Insights from Early Adopters. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2314, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 1–6.
7. Cherry C. R., Weinert J. X., and Xinmiao Y. Comparative Environmental Impacts of Electric Bikes in China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2009, pp. 281–290.
8. Cherry C. Can Electric Bikes Provide Sustainable Transportation Solutions to Chinese Cities? An Investigation of Impacts on the Transportation System. Presented at Symposium on Transportation and Development Innovative Best Practices, ASCE Transportation Development Institute, Beijing, 2008.
9. Rose G. E-Bikes and Urban Transportation: Emerging Issues and Unresolved Questions. Transportation, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2012, pp. 81–96.
10. Weinert J., Ma C., and Cherry C. The Transition to Electric Bikes in China: History and Key Reasons for Rapid Growth. Transportation, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2007, pp. 301–318.
11. Cherry C., and Cervero R. Use Characteristics and Mode Choice Behavior of Electric Bike Users in China. Transport Policy, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2007, pp. 247–257.
12. Bhat C. R., Sen S., and Eluru N. The Impact of Demographics, Built Environment Attributes, Vehicle Characteristics, and Gasoline Prices on Household Vehicle Holdings and Use. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1–18.
13. Wang Q. Development and Trends of China's Automobile Market: Evidence from Urban Household Ownership of Cars, Bicycles, Motorcycles, and Motorbikes. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2011, pp. 99–113.
14. Weinert J., Ogden J., Sperling D., and Burke A. The Future of Electric Two-Wheelers and Electric Vehicles in China. Energy Policy, Vol. 36, No. 7, 2008, pp. 2544–2555.
15. Cervero R., and Kockelman K. Travel Demand and the 3ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1997, pp. 199–219.
16. Ewing R., and Cervero R. Travel and the Built Environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76, No. 3, 2010, pp. 265–294.
17. Cao X. Y. Exploring Causal Effects of Neighborhood Type on Walking Behavior Using Stratification on the Propensity Score. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2010, pp. 487–504.
18. Krizek K. J. Operationalizing Neighborhood Accessibility for Land Use-Travel Behavior Research and Regional Modeling. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2003, pp. 270–287.
19. Levine J., and Frank L. D. Transportation and Land-Use Preferences and Residents' Neighborhood Choices: The Sufficiency of Compact Development in the Atlanta Region. Transportation, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2007, pp. 255–274.
20. Lin J., and Long L. What Neighborhood Are You In? Empirical Findings of Relationships Between Household Travel and Neighborhood Characteristics. Transportation, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2008, pp. 739–758.
21. Pinjari A. R., Eluru N., Bhat C. R., Pendyala R. M., and Spissu E. Joint Model of Choice of Residential Neighborhood and Bicycle Ownership: Accounting for Self-Selection and Unobserved Heterogeneity. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2082, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 17–26.
22. Rodriguez D. A., Khattak A. J., and Evenson K. R. Can New Urban-ism Encourage Physical Activity? Comparing a New Urbanist Neighborhood with Conventional Suburbs. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2006, pp. 43–54.
23. Zhang M. The Role of Land Use in Travel Mode Choice: Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 70, No. 3, 2004, pp. 344–360.
24. Boarnet M. G., and Crane R. Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel. Oxford University Press, Cary, N.C., 2001.
25. Cervero R. Built Environments and Mode Choice: Toward a Normative Framework. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2002, pp. 265–284.
26. Cao X., Mokhtarian P., and Handy S. Do Changes in Neighborhood Characteristics Lead to Changes in Travel Behavior? A Structural Equations Modeling Approach. Transportation, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2007, pp. 535–556.
27. Frank L., Kerr J., Chapman J., and Sallis J. Urban Form Relationships with Walk Trip Frequency and Distance Among Youth. American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2007, pp. 305–311.
28. Khattak A. J., and Rodriguez D. Travel Behavior in Neo-Traditional Neighborhood Developments: A Case Study in USA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2005, pp. 481–500.
29. Kockelman K. M. Travel Behavior as Function of Accessibility, Land Use Mixing, and Land Use Balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 116–125.
30. Ewing R., and Cervero R. Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 87–114.
31. Crane R., and Crepeau R. Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel? A Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data1. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1998, pp. 225–238.
32. Zegras C. The Built Environment and Motor Vehicle Ownership and Use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile. Urban Studies, Vol. 47, No. 8, 2010, pp. 1793–1817.
33. Shay E., and Khattak A. J. Automobiles, Trips, and Neighborhood Type: Comparing Environmental Measures. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2010, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 73–82.
34. Zhongshan Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Zhongshan Statistical Yearbook 2010. China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2010.
35. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook 2009. China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2009.
36. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook 2010. China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2010.
37. Martinez L. M., Viegas J. M., and Silva E. A. A Traffic Analysis Zone Definition: A New Methodology and Algorithm. Transportation, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2009, pp. 581–599.
38. Code for Transport Planning on Urban Road (in Chinese). GB 50220-95. Ministry of Construction, Beijing, 1995.
39. Code for Urban Land Use Classes and Standards of Planning Construction Land (in Chinese). GBJ 137-90. Ministry of Construction, Beijing, 1990.
40. Song Y., and Knaap G.-J. Quantitative Classification of Neighbourhoods: The Neighbourhoods of New Single-Family Homes in the Portland Metropolitan Area. Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1–24.
41. Long J. S., and Freese J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. StataCorp L P, College Station, Tex., 2006.
42. Long J. S. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 1997.
43. Khattak A. J., Wang X., and Zhang H. Spatial Analysis and Modeling of Traffic Incidents for Proactive Incident Management and Strategic Planning. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2178, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 128–137.
44. Anastasopoulos P. C., Labi S., and McCullouch B. G. Analyzing the Duration and Prolongation of Performance-Based Contracts Through Hazard-Based Duration and Zero-Inflated Random Parameters Poisson Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2136, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 11–19.
45. China-Bicycle-Association. The Survey Analysis of China's E-Bike Market (in Chinese). China Bicycle, No. 12, 2007, pp. 27–28.
46. Handy S., Cao X., and Mokhtarian P. Correlation or Causality Between the Built Environment and Travel Behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2005, pp. 427–444.
47. Krizek K. J. Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 69, No. 3, 2003, pp. 265–281.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 107
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 24
- Battery swapping demand simulation for electric micromobility vehicles...
- Exploring built environment factors on e-bike travel behavior in urban...
- E-bikes in rural areas: current and potential users in the Netherlands
- Gender Differences in Environmental Correlates of Cycling Activity amo...
- Non-Linear Effects of the Built Environment and Social Environment on ...
- Non-linear relationships between built environment characteristics and...
- A Study of Taxi Service Mode Choice Based on Evolutionary Game Theory
- Development of Multivariate Ordered Probit Model to Understand Househo...
- Sustainable Highway Design: Disentangling the Effects of Geometric-Rel...
- Travel mode choices in small cities of China: A case study of Changtin...
- Why cycling matters for electric mobility: towards diverse, active and...
- Benign mobility? Electric bicycles, sustainable transport consumption ...
- Investigating the impacts of built environment on vehicle miles travel...
- Bicycle mode share in China: a city-level analysis of long term trends
- Effects of metro transit on the ownership of mobility instruments in X...
- Usage Patterns of Electric Bicycles: An Analysis of the WeBike Project
- Designing Sustainable Public Transportation: Integrated Optimization o...
- Study on the Ownership of Motorized and Non-motorized Vehicles in Subu...
- Moving towards Sustainability: Road Grades and On-Road Emissions of He...
- Spontaneous emergence versus technology management in sustainable mobi...
- Who Will Use Pre-Trip Traveler Information and How Will They Respond?...
- Does the Built Environment Make a Difference? An Investigation of Hou...
- Household, Personal and Environmental Correlates of Rural Elderly’s C...
- The Built Environment and Walking Activity of the Elderly: An Empirica...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
