Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Driver Gap Acceptance Behavior at Modern Roundabouts

Abstract

Despite an increasing acceptance of modern roundabouts in the United States, unfamiliarity with this type of intersection is still widespread. This unfamiliarity results in drivers making unpredictable decisions about gap acceptance, thus increasing the difficulty of design decisions. The relationship between the spatial and temporal critical gaps accepted by drivers in modern roundabouts is explored with gap acceptance data from more than 1,500 vehicle interactions at the roundabout on the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, campus. The critical gap was determined to be 42 ft spatially and 2.2 s temporally, which correlated directly with the average speed of the circulating flow. A longer critical gap time was observed for heavy vehicles in the traffic stream. Even though the unidirectional flow of the circulating traffic creates a potentially unpredictable environment for the driver, careful and precise analysis to obtain an accurate and reliable value of the critical gap will allow for improved roundabout design.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Polus A., Lazar S. S., and Livneh M. Critical Gap as a Function of Waiting Time in Determining Roundabout Capacity, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, 2003, pp. 504–509.
2. Tupper S., Knodler M. Jr., and Hurwitz D. Comparative Analysis of Critical Gap Analysis Methods. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 2011.
3. Tupper S., Knodler M. Jr., and Hurwitz D. Connecting Gap Acceptance Behavior with Crash Experience. Presented at 3rd International Conference on Road Safety and Simulation, Sept. 14–16, 2011, Indianapolis, Ind., 2011.
4. Gattis J. L., and Low S. T. Gap Acceptance at Atypical Stop-Controlled Intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 125, 1999, pp. 201–207.
5. Gorjestani A., Menon A., Cheng P.-M., Newstrom B., Shankwitz C., and Donath M. Macroscopic Review of Driver Gap Acceptance and Rejection Behavior at Rural Thru-Stop Intersections in the US: Data Collection Results for Eight States. CICAS-SSA Report 3. Intelligent Transportation Systems Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2010, p. 77.
6. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
7. Taekratok T. Modern Roundabouts for Oregon. 98-SRS-522. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, June 1998.
8. Jacquemart G. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 264: Modern Roundabout Practice in the United States, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.
9. Flannery A., and Elefteriadou L. A Review of Roundabout Safety Performance in the United States. Presented at ITE International Conference, Tampa, Fla., March 23–26, 1997.
10. Retting R. A., Persaud B. N., Garder P. E., and Lord D. Crash and Injury Reduction Following Installation of Roundabouts in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 91, 2001, pp. 628–631.
11. Mandavilli S., Rys M. J., and Russell E. R. Environmental Impact of Modern Roundabouts. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 38, 2008, pp. 135–142.
12. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009 (including Revisions 1 and 2 dated May 2012).
13. Kittelson W. K., and Vandehey M. A. Delay Effects on Driver Gap Acceptance Characteristics at Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1320, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 154–159.
14. Tupper S. M., Knodler M. A. Jr., and Hurwitz D. Connecting Gap Acceptance Behavior with Crash Experience. Presented at 3rd International Conference on Road Safety and Simulation, Indianapolis, Ind., 2011.
15. Tupper S., Knodler M. A. Jr., Fitzpatrick C., and Hurwitz D. S. Estimating Critical Gap—A Comparison of Methodologies Using a Robust, Real-World Data Set. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.
16. Al-Masaeid H. R. Capacity and Performance of Roundabouts. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 26, 1999, pp. 597–605.
17. Strasbourg K. N., Ahuja S., Cheng T. N., and van Vuren T. Estimation and Simulation of Gap Acceptance Behaviour at Congested Roundabouts. Presented at 2006 European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France, Sept. 18–20, 2006.
18. Cheng J., Yang X., Deng W., and Huang X. Driver's Critical Gap Calibration at Urban Roundabouts: A Case Study in China. Tsinghua Science and Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2008, pp. 237–242.
19. Xu F., and Tian Z. Z. Driver Behavior and Gap-Acceptance Characteristics at Roundabouts in California. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2071, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 117–124.
20. Johnson T. O., and Garder P. An Evaluation of the Effects of Different Driver Groups on Control Delay at a Low-Volume Roundabout Approach in Bangor, Maine. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
21. Guo R. Estimating Critical Gap of Roundabouts by Different Methods. Proc., 6th Advanced Forum on Transportation of China, 2010, pp. 84–89.
22. Mensah S., Eshragh S., and Faghri A. A Critical Gap Analysis for Modern Roundabouts. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
23. Comprehensive Evaluation of Wisconsin Roundabouts. Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory, Madison, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Cole D. Fitzpatrick
Room 139B, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Marston Hall, Amherst, MA 01003.
Daniel S. Abrams
Room 139B, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Marston Hall, Amherst, MA 01003.
Yue Tang
Room 139C, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Marston Hall, Amherst, MA 01003.
Michael A. Knodler, Jr.
Room 142B, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Marston Hall, Amherst, MA 01003.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 113

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 13

  1. Developing empirical model with graphical tool to estimate and predict...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Analytical approximation and calibration of roundabout capacity: A mer...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Analysis of motorcycle microscopic characteristics at roundabouts unde...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Impact of Police Enforcement on Critical Gap at Roundabouts
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Critical Gap Comparison between One-, Two-, and Three-Lane Roundabouts...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Evaluation of the Roundabout Capacity Model in HCM6 Edition and HCM 20...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Group Gap Acceptance: A New Method to Analyze Driver Behavior and Esti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. A video processing system for automated traffic data collection of gap...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Development of a tracking-based system for automated traffic data coll...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Analysis of dilemma zone for pedestrians at high-speed uncontrolled mi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Comparative evaluation of roundabout capacities under heterogeneous tr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Review and Outlook of Roundabout Capacity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Estimating the Mean Critical Gap
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub