Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Low-Mass Urban Microcars for the Emerging Vehicle Markets of Megacities

Abstract

For rapidly growing vehicle markets, small, low-mass vehicles show promise. New regulatory norms that take into account the differing operating environments and demands of these vehicles are needed. The potential for such vehicles to meet the demands of consumers and transportation systems in emerging markets—particularly in dense megacities, initially as commercial last-mile transportation and more broadly for private automobile consumers—is explored. A proposal for a regulatory template for these urban microcars considers potential energy, emissions, and safety impacts, borrowing features from the low-speed vehicle category in the United States and the L5e motor tricycle and L7e heavy quadricycle norms in the European Union.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Dargay J., Gately D., and Sommer M. Vehicle Ownership and Income Growth, Worldwide: 1960–2030. The Energy Journal, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2007, pp. 168–169.
2. Ernst & Young. Megatrends Shaping the Chinese Light Vehicle Industry. Executive Summary, 2011. http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Mega_trends_shaping_the_Chinese_light_vehicle_industry/$FILE/GAC%20%20CHINA%20Megatrends%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed July 2012.
3. Atsmon Y., Magni M., Li L., and Liao W. Meet the 2020 Chinese Consumer. McKinsey & Company, March 2012. http://www.mckinseychina.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/mckinsey-meet-the-2020-consumer.pdf. Accessed July 2012.
4. Wang Y., Teter J., and Sperling D. China's Soaring Vehicle Population: Even Greater Than Forecasted? Energy Policy, Vol. 39, 2011, pp. 3296–3306.
5. Jraiw K. Urban Road Transport in Asia's Developing Countries: Safety and Efficiency Strategy. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1846, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 19–25.
6. Amekudzi A. A., Thomas-Mobley L., and Ross C. Transportation Planning and Infrastructure Delivery in Major Cities and Megacities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1997, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 17–23.
7. Hirota K. Policy for Better Air Quality in Asia—Proposal for a Policy Evaluation Method for Four ASEAN Countries. Studies in Regional Science, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2008, pp. 1093–1104.
8. Posada F., Kamakate F., and Bandivadekar A. Sustainable Management of Two- and Three-Wheelers in Asia. Working Paper 2011-13. International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2011.
9. 2010 Census Summary File 1 U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2011.
10. Li J., Walker J. L., Srinivasan S., and Anderson W. P. Modeling Private Car Ownership in China: Investigation of Urban Form Impact Across Megacities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2193, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 76–84.
11. Schimek P. Household Motor Vehicle Ownership and Use: How Much Does Residential Density Matter? In Transportation Research Record 1552, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 120–125.
12. Bento A., Cropper M., Moborak A., and Vinha K. The Impact of Urban Spatial Structure on Travel Demand in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 87, No. 3, 2005, pp. 466–478.
13. The State of Chinese Cities, 2010/2011: Better City, Better Life. UN Habitat for a Better Urban Future. Foreign Languages Press, Beijing, 2010.
14. Davis N., Lents J., Osses M., Nikkila N., and Barth M. J. Development and Application of an International Vehicle Emissions Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1939, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 157–165.
15. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Final Rule 33913, 1998. http://www.nhtsa.gov/cars/rules/rulings/lsv/lsv.html. Accessed July 2012.
16. Directive 2002/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Communities, Mar. 18, 2002. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:124:0001:0044:EN:PDF. Accessed July 2012.
17. Worldwide Situation of Low Speed Vehicles. Report prepared for the Minister of Transportation, Quebec. Quebec Advanced Transportation Institute, Canada, Mar. 2008. www.itaq.qc.ca/pdf/LSV_ITAQ.pdf. Accessed July 2012.
18. Lahiri K., and Alakjary T. Tata Nano—The Low Cost Aspirational Four Wheeler (A). May 27, 2010. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1616562; or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1616562. Accessed July 2012.
19. Ni M.-C., Kurani K. S., and Sperling D. Motorization in China: Case Study in Shanghai. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2193, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 68–75.
20. Proposed New Emissions Standards for Two- and Three-Wheeled Vehicles in Europe. ICCT Policy Update No. 9. International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington, D.C., Nov. 28, 2010.
21. Edmunds Car Buyers Guide. www.edmunds.com. Accessed Nov. 12, 2012.
22. Carbuyer UK. www.carbuyer.co.uk. Accessed Nov. 12, 2012.
23. European New Car Assessment Programme. The Tests Explained: Frontal Impact. http://www.euroncap.com/tests/frontimpact.aspx. Accessed Nov. 12, 2012.
24. Mohan D. Perspective on Road Safety in India. Proc., 4th Regional International Road Federation Conference on Road Safety, New Delhi, India, Oct. 23–24, 2009.
25. Koornstra M. Prediction of Traffic Fatalities and Prospects for Mobility Becoming Sustainable-Safe. Sadhana, Vol. 32, No. 4, Aug. 2007, pp. 365–395.
26. Warren D. L. Speed Zoning and Control. Synthesis of Safety Research Related to Traffic Control and Roadway Elements. Chapter 17. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1982.
27. Taylor M. C., Baruya A., and Kennedy J. V. The Relationship Between Speed and Accidents on Rural Single-Carriageway Roads. Report 511. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 2002.
28. Cheah L., Evans C., Bandivadekar A., and Heywood J. Factor of Two: Halving the Fuel Consumption of New U.S. Automobiles by 2035. Laboratory for Energy and the Environment, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Oct. 2007. http://web.mit.edu/sloan-auto-lab/research/beforeh2/files/cheah_factorTwo.pdf. Accessed July 2012.
29. Ross M., Patel D., and Wenzel T. Vehicle Design and the Physics of Traffic Safety. Physics Today. American Institute for Physics, Jan. 2006, pp. 49–54. http://people.cas.uab.edu/∼nordlund/Courses/PH201/Links/vol59no1p49_54.pdf. Accessed July 2012.
30. Kenworthy J., and Laube F. Patterns of Automobile Dependence in Cities: An International Overview of Key Physical and Economic Dimensions with Some Implications for Urban Policy. Transportation Research A, Vol. 33, 1999, pp. 691–723.
31. Zhang M. The Role of Land Use in Travel Mode Choice—Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 70, No. 3, 2004, pp. 344–360.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Eric C. Cahill
Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616.
Bill Taylor
kVA, 1708-C Augusta Street, Suite 3, Greenville, SC 29605.
Dan Sperling
Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 66

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Lightweight Urban Electric Microcars: An Overview
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Simulation of crash events for an electric four wheel vehicle
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Evaluation of the end-of-life performance of a hybrid scooter with the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A feasibility study of an electric–hydraulic hybrid powertrain for pas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Personalized Public Transportation: A Mobility Model and its Applicati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Future Urban Transportation Technologies for Sustainability with an Em...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub