Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Statewide Multimodal Planning: Current Practice at State Departments of Transportation

Abstract

This paper summarizes the results of a national survey of state departments of transportation (DOTs) focusing on the extent to which they emphasized multimodal solutions in transportation planning. The results offer insights into the size, the scope, and the progress in multimodal planning that states have been making since the passage of the Inter-modal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. The online survey instrument was distributed to all 50 state DOTs; 35 responses were collected. Some key challenges that apparently limited the adoption of multimodal planning approaches in earlier decades are still considered challenges today. The current snapshot of multimodal planning suggests that most state transportation agencies still do not use evaluation criteria to compare multiple modal options. Not surprisingly, constraints and limitations on project eligibility because of funding source restrictions were identified as the major limitation to advances in multimodal planning and program development, followed by the need to follow agency standard operating procedures and by an agency's history and culture of highway-dominated planning. However, changes were clearly taking place. It is a positive sign that many state officials (20 out of 35) concluded that real progress had been made in furthering multimodal planning objectives during the past 10 years.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Sonnenberg A. H., and Meyer M. D. Literature Review of Multimodal Transportation Agencies and Institutional Structures: Task 1. Georgia Department of Transportation Project RP 11-04: Multimodal Needs, Constraints, and Opportunities: Observations and Lessons Learned for Georgia and GDOT. Georgia Department of Transportation, 2011.
2. Fontaine M. D., and Miller J. S. Virginia Transportation Research Council. Technical Assistance Report—Survey of Statewide Multimodal Transportation Planning Practices. 2002. www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/03-tar9.pdf. Accessed Aug. 15, 2011.
3. Miller J. S. Multimodal Statewide Transportation Planning. A Survey of State Practices. Virginia Transportation Research Council, 2005. http://vtrc.virginiadot.org/PubDetails.aspx?id=296524. Accessed Aug. 15, 2012.
4. Crain and Associates, Inc. TCRP Report 14: Institutional Barriers to Intermodal Policies and Planning in Metropolitan Areas. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996.
5. Peyrebrune H. L. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 286: Multi-modal Aspects of Statewide Transportation Planning. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
6. Transmanagement, Inc. NCHRP Report 404: Innovative Practices for Multimodal Transportation Planning for Freight and Passengers. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.
7. Goetz A. R., Szyliowicz J. S., Vowles T. M., and Taylor G. S. Assessing Intermodal Transportation Planning at State Departments of Transportation. Intermodal Transportation Institute, University of Denver, Colo., 2004. http://www.du.edu/transportation. Accessed Aug. 15, 2012.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Anthon H. Sonnenberg
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, SEB Building, Room 324, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355.
Frank Southworth
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, SEB Building, Room 324, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355.
Michael D. Meyer
Parsons Brinckerhoff, 1401 K Street, NW, No. 701, Washington, DC 20005.
Carol L. Comer
Georgia Department of Transportation, 600 West Peachtree NW, Atlanta, GA 30308.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 50

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Strategically Aligning Capital Improvement Prioritization to Performan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub