Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2013

Sketch-Level Approach to Incorporate Active Traffic Management into the Regional Planning Process

Abstract

Active traffic management (ATM) investments, such as variable speed limits (VSLs), queue warning systems, hard shoulder running, and dynamic ramp metering, offer mobility, safety, and environmental benefits. ATM investments differ from conventional capacity investments in a number of ways, such as lower capital costs, shorter planning horizons, reduced right-of-way requirements, and heightened need to consider longer-term operations. As a result, agencies sometimes have difficulty in determining how to incorporate ATM into the planning process. This paper develops a conceptual framework to enable consideration of ATM investments alongside traditional capacity investments in the regional transportation planning process. Although states and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) already consider operational initiatives to some degree, the proposed framework offers 10 practices to strengthen regional planning for ATM initiatives. Practices include (a) linking ATM to the MPO's congestion management plan, (b) using operations-related performance measures such as delay and reliability, (c) using sketch planning techniques to estimate the safety and environmental aspects of ATM when detailed simulation studies are infeasible, (d) encouraging the inclusion of operations-related goals in local and regional plans, and (e) relating ATM to statewide policies. The framework uses a mixture of two strategies: translating ATM effects into a planning-related narrative and modifying the planning process to be compatible with ATM. The rationale is not to promote ATM as more effective than other types of investments but rather to compare ATM objectively with such investments. The framework is demonstrated with a case study of VSLs on Interstate 66 in Virginia.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Mirshahi M., Obenberger J., Fuhs C. A., Howard C. E., Krammes R. A., Kuhn B. T., Mayhew R. M., Moore M. A., Sahebjam K., Stone C. J., and Yung J. L. Active Traffic Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.
2. Tarnoff P. J. Now There's a Thought: Planning for Traffic Management and Operations. Traffic Technology International, Dec. 2005/Jan. 2006, pp. 40–44.
3. TransCore. Integrating Intelligent Transportation Systems within the Transportation Planning Process: An Interim Handbook. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1998.
4. Berman W., and Mayhew R. Regional Collaboration to Improve Safety, Reliability, and Security. Public Roads, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2004, pp. 9–13.
5. Dahlgren J., and Lee D. B. Jr. Integrating ITS Alternatives into Investment Decisions in California. Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2004-40. University of California, Berkeley, 2004.
6. Grant M., Bauer J., Plaskon T., and Mason J. Advancing Metropolitan Planning for Operations: An Objectives-Driven, Performance-Based Approach: A Guidebook. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
7. Capital District Transportation Committee. The Metropolitan Congestion Management Process. Albany, N.Y. 2007. http://www.cdtcmpo.org/rtp2030/materials/cm-doc.pdf. Accessed Aug. 23, 2010.
8. The Denver Region Traffic Signal System Improvement Program: Planning for Management and Operations. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009.
9. Denver Regional Council of Governments. Traffic Signal System Improvement Program 2010 Update Summary Report (Draft). 2010. http://www.drcog.org/documents/Draft%20TSSIP%202010%20Update%20Summary%20Report.pdf. Accessed Aug. 24, 2010.
10. Getting More by Working Together—Opportunities for Linking Planning and Operations. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004.
11. Regional Concept for Transportation Operations (RCTO) Final Report: Southeast Michigan Experience. Southeastern Michigan Council of Governments, Detroit, Mich., 2007.
12. Regional Concept for Transportation Operations Fosters Planning for Operations in the Tucson Metropolitan Area. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009.
13. Chen Y.-W., Chiang Y.-S., and Wei C.-H. A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Framework of Urban Transport Policies Integrating Investment, Pricing, Regulation and Subsidy Options. Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
14. Dowling R. G., Skabardonis A., and Reinke D. B. Predicting Impacts of Intelligent Transportation Systems on Freeway Queue Discharge Flow Variability. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2047, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 49–56.
15. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. Tracking Progress Toward 2030: Regional Indicators for the DVRPC Long Range Plan. 2008. http://www.dvrpc.org/reports/07027.pdf. Accessed Aug. 23, 2010.
16. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. Overview of the Congestion Management Process (CMP). 2009. http://www.dvrpc.org/reports/09028A.pdf. Accessed Aug. 23, 2010.
17. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. DVRPC CMP Strategies by Subcorridor. 2009. http://www.dvrpc.org/CongestionManagement/pdf/NJ_CMP_Strategies.pdf. Accessed Aug. 23, 2010.
18. Puget Sound Regional Council. Appendix A: Transportation 2040 Alternatives Analysis Congestion Management Process Report (T240 DEIS Appendix I–May 2009). 2009. http://psrc.org/assets/3544/Smart_Corridors_Appendix_A.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2010.
19. Puget Sound Regional Council. SMART Corridors/CMP Report. 2010. http://psrc.org/assets/3543/CMPChap1-4.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2010.
20. Wasatch Front Regional Council. Wasatch Front Urban Area Regional Transportation Plan: 2007–2030 Technical Report 46. 2007. http://www.wfrc.org/cms/publications/Adopted_2007–2030_RTP/Chapter%208%20-%20Recommended%20Improvements.pdf. Accessed Aug. 27, 2010.
21. Ravanbakht C., Akan G., Hanshaw S., and Allsbrook L. Linking Planning and Operations to Improve Regional Mobility and Safety in Hampton Roads, Virginia. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1978, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 184–192.
22. Coffman M. T., and Makler J. State of ITS: Telling the Intelligent Transportation Systems Success Story for Portland, Oregon. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
23. Franklin C. A., Meese A. J., Nelson D., Vaughn K., and Yin J. Draft Strategic Plan for the Metropolitan Washington Management, Operations, and Intelligent Transportation Systems (MOITS) Planning Program. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. 2010. http://www.mwcog.org/uploads/committee-documents/fF5ZVlZW20100609100430.pdf. Accessed Aug. 20, 2010.
24. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization. Operations Planning. Chesapeake. 2009. http://hrtpo.org/TPO_OpPlanning.asp. Accessed May 23, 2012.
25. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. 2008 Supplemental Projects Status Memorandum: DVRPC Congestion Management Process. 2008. http://www.dvrpc.org/CongestionManagement/pdf/2008-03_CMPStatus.pdf. Accessed Aug. 24, 2010.
26. DKS Associates, PBSJ, and Jack Faucett Associates. A Domestic Scan of Congestion Pricing and Managed Lanes. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009.
27. Grant M., Bowen B., Jasper K., Maggiore M., and Wallis E. Statewide Opportunities for Integrating Operations, Safety, and Multimodal Planning: A Reference Manual. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/statewide/manual/manual.pdf. Accessed Aug. 27, 2010.
28. Commonwealth of Virginia. Virginia Surface Transportation Plan 2035. 2010. http://www.vtrans.org/resources/VSTP_Entire_Report.pdf. Accessed Feb. 29, 2012.
29. Virginia Department of Transportation. VDOT Road Safety Assessment Guidelines. 2008. http://www.virginiadot.org/business/resources/traffic_eng_hsip/VDOT_RSA_Guidelines_200804.pdf. Accessed Feb. 29, 2012.
30. County of Fairfax. Fairfax County Comprehensive Plan, 2007 Edition, Policy Plan Transportation, Amended Through 3-9-2009. 2009. http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpz/comprehensiveplan/policyplan/transportation.pdf. Accessed Aug. 24, 2010.
31. National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. Washington, D.C. CLRP: Long-Range Transportation Plan. 2010. http://www.mwcog.org/clrp/default.asp. Accessed Sept. 7, 2010.
32. Fontaine M. D., and Fudala N. J. Work Zone Variable Speed Limit Systems: Effectiveness and System Design Issues. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 2010.
33. Banks J. H. Effect of Time Gaps and Lane Flow Distributions on Freeway Bottleneck Capacity. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1965, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 3–11.
34. National Audit Office, London. Tackling Congestion by Making Better Use of England's Motorways and Trunk Roads. 2004. http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0405/tackling_congestion.aspx. Accessed July 11, 2012.
35. National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, D.C. Transportation: The TPB Vision. 1998. http://www.mwcog.org/transportation/activities/vision/. Accessed Sept. 10, 2010.
36. Skycomp, Inc. Traffic Quality on the Metropolitan Washington Area Freeway System. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, D.C. 2009. http://www.mwcog.org/uploads/pub-documents/81ZdXg20090526131814.pdf. Accessed Aug. 20, 2010.
37. Tignor S. C., Hawkins H. G., Brown L. L., Butner J. L., Cunard R., Davis S. C., Fischer E. L., Kehrli M. R., Rusch P. F., and Wainwright W. S. Innovative Traffic Control Technology and Practice in Europe. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1999.
38. Highway Safety Improvement Program, Fiscal Year 2008–2009. Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, 2007.
39. Active Traffic Management: Innovative Techniques for the Future. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Sept. 2007.
40. Waller S. T., Ng M. W., Ferguson E., Nezamuddin N., and Sun D. Speed Harmonization and Peak-Period Shoulder Use to Manage Urban Freeway Congestion. University of Texas at Austin, 2009. http://www.utexas.edu/research/ctr/pdf_reports/0_5913_1.pdf. Accessed Aug. 19, 2010.
41. Schrank D., and Lomax T. 2009 Urban Mobility Report. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, 2009.
42. Fuhs C. Synthesis of Active Traffic Management Experiences in Europe and the United States. Report FHWA-HOP-10-031. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
43. Jacobson L. Smarter Highways: Seattle ATM Update. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
44. PB Americas, Inc., Carter + Burgess, EarthTech, Inc., and Telvent Farradyne. Active Traffic Management (ATM) Feasibility Study. Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle. 2007. http://www.psrc.org/assets/524/ATMfeasiblitystudy.pdf. Accessed Sept. 7, 2010.
45. Science Applications International Corporation. Rural Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Toolbox. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002. http://www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov/JPODOCS/REPTS_TE/13477.html. Accessed Sept. 7, 2010.
46. Mazzenga N. J., and Demetsky M. J. Investigation of Solutions to Recurring Congestion on Freeways. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013

Rights and permissions

© 2013 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

John S. Miller
Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research, 530 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903.
Michael D. Fontaine
Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research, 530 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 19

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub