Full versus Simple Safety Performance Functions: Comparison Based on Urban Four-Lane Freeway Interchange Influence Areas in Florida
Abstract
The empirical Bayes approach adopted in the Highway Safety Manual and the SafetyAnalyst software application require the use of safety performance functions (SPFs). SafetyAnalyst adopts a form of SPF, known as the simple SPF, that relates crash experience to traffic volume only. It is a flow-only model that is calibrated by using all sites irrespective of their base geometric conditions. Full SPFs, however, relate crash occurrence to roadway geometric characteristics in addition to traffic characteristics. This study compared the simple SPFs provided in SafetyAnalyst with full SPFs in two safety applications: crash prediction performance and identification of high-crash locations. To compare the prediction performance, the simple and full SPFs were estimated with data collected on urban four-lane freeway interchange influence areas in Florida. Models were estimated for both total crashes and fatal and injury crashes. The mean absolute deviance and the mean square prediction error were used to assess and compare the prediction performance of the two models, and the variation in ranking the high-crash locations with each model was also examined. The results showed that the two models yielded very similar performance of crash prediction and network screening. This empirical result supports the use of the flow-only SPF model adopted in SafetyAnalyst, whose development requires much less effort compared with that for full SPFs.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Hauer E. On Exposure and Accident Rate. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 36, No. 3, 1995, pp. 134–138.
2. SafetyAnalyst. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. Accessed June 14, 2012.
3. Highway Safety Manual, 1st ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2010.
4. Lu L., Lu J., Lin P., Wang Z., and Chen H. Development of an Interface Between FDOT's Crash Analysis Reporting System and the Safety Analyst. Final Report. Florida DOT Research Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, 2009.
5. SafetyAnalyst: Software Tools for Safety Management of Specific Highway Sites. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, July 2010.
6. Jovanis P. P., and Chang H.-L. Modeling the Relationship of Accidents to Miles Traveled. In Transportation Research Record 1068, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 42–51.
7. Kraus J. F., Anderson C. L., Arzemanian S., Salatka M., Hemyari P., and Sun G. Epidemiological Aspects of Fatal and Severe Injury Urban Freeway Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1993, pp. 229–239.
8. Khan S., Shanmugam R., and Hoeschen B. Injury, Fatal, and Property Damage Accident Models for Highway Corridors. In Transportation Research Record 1665, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 84–92.
9. Dean C., and Lawless F. Tests for Detecting Overdispersion in Poisson Regression Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 84, 1989, pp. 467–472.
10. Alluri P. Development of Guidance for States Transitioning to New Safety Analysis Tools. PhD dissertation. Clemson University, Clemson, S.C., 2010.
11. Lu J., Gan A., Haleem K., and Wu W. Clustering-Based Roadway Segment Division for the Identification of High Crash Locations. Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, Vol. 5, 2013, pp. 224–239.
12. Konduri S., and Sinha K. C. Statistical Models for Prediction of Freeway Incidents. Proc., Seventh International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technology in Transportation Engineering, Cambridge, Mass., 2002, pp. 167–174.
13. Garber N. J., and Ehrhart A. A. The Effect of Speed, Flow, and Geometric Characteristics on Crash Rates for Different Types of Virginia Highways. Final Report. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 2000.
14. Persaud B. N. Estimating Accident Potential of Ontario Road Sections. In Transportation Research Record 1327, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 47–53.
15. Tegge R., and Ouyang Y. Developing Safety Performance Functions for Illinois. ICT Project R27-20. Illinois Department of Transportation, Springfield, 2007.
16. Kiattikomol V., Chatterjee A., Hummer J., and Younger M. Planning Level Regression Models for Prediction of Crashes on Interchange and Noninterchange Segments of Urban Freeways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 134, No. 3, 2008, pp. 111–117.
17. Lord D., Kuo P.-F., and Geedipally S. R. Comparison of Application of Product of Baseline Models and Accident-Modification Factors and Models with Covariates: Predicted Mean Values and Variance. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2147, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 113–122.
18. Kononov J., and Allery B. K. Explicit Consideration of Safety in Transportation Planning and Project Scoping. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1897, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 116–125.
19. Persaud B., and Dzbik L. Accident Prediction Models for Freeways. In Transportation Research Record 1401, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 55–60.
20. Lu J., Gan A., Haleem K., Alluri P., and Liu K. Comparing Locally Calibrated and SafetyAnalyst-Default Safety Performance Functions for Florida's Urban Freeways. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
21. Poch M., and Mannering F. Negative Binomial Analysis of Intersection Accident Frequencies. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 122, No. 2, 1996, pp. 105–113.
22. Moon J., and Hummer J. Development of Safety Prediction Models for Influence Areas of Ramps in Freeways. Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1–17.
23. Shankar V., Mannering F., and Barfield W. Effect of Roadway Geometrics and Environmental Factors on Rural Freeway Accident Frequencies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1995, pp. 371–389.
24. Fridstrom L., Ifver J., Ingebrigtsen S., Kulmala R., and Thomsen L. K. Measuring the Contribution of Randomness, Exposure, Weather, and Daylight to the Variation in Road Accident Counts. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, No. 1, 1995, pp. 1–20.
25. Persaud B., Lyon C., and Nguyen T. Empirical Bayes Procedure for Ranking Sites for Safety Investigation by Potential for Safety Improvement. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1665, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 7–12.
26. Hauer E., Harwood D. W., Council F. M., and Griffith M. S. Estimating Safety by the Empirical Bayes Method: A Tutorial. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1784, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 126–131.
27. Elvik R. State-of-the-Art Approaches to Road Accident Black Spot Management and Safety Analysis of Road Networks. Report 883. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway, 2007.
28. Gan A., Haleem K., Alluri P., Lu J., Wang T., Ma M., and Diaz C. Preparing Florida for Deployment of SafetyAnalyst for All Roads. Final Report. Lehman Center for Transportation Research, Florida International University, Miami, 2012.
29. SafetyAnalyst User's Manual. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009.
30. Haleem K., and Abdel-Aty M. Application of GLASSO in Variable Selection and Crash Prediction at Unsignalized Intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 138, No. 7, 2012, pp. 949–960.
31. Geisser S. Predictive Inference: An Introduction. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993.
32. Alluri P., and Ogle J. Effects of State-Specific SPFs, AADT Estimations, and Overdispersion Parameters on Crash Predictions Using SafetyAnalyst. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
33. Pilko P., Bared J., Edara P., and Kim T. Safety Assessment of Interchange Spacing on Urban Freeways. Publication FHWA-HRT-07-031. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.
34. Chen H., Liu P., Lu J., and Behzadi B. Evaluating the Safety Impacts of the Number and Arrangement of Lanes on Freeway Exit Ramps. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2009, pp. 543–551.
35. Vernon D., and Cook L. Analysis of the Impact of Increased Speed Limits in Utah. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1999.
36. Elvik R., Christensen P., and Amundsen A. Speed and Road Accidents: An Evaluation of the Power Model. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway, 2004.
37. Qin X., Ng M., and Reyes P. E. Identifying Crash-Prone Locations with Quantile Regression. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1531–1537.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: January 1, 2013
Issue published: January 2013
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 94
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 11
- Developing Safety Performance Functions for Commercial Motor Vehicle C...
- Developing Commercial Motor Vehicle Crash-Specific Safety Performance ...
- Comprehensive Investigation of Commercial Motor Vehicle Crashes along ...
- Safety Evaluation of an Adaptive Signal Control Technology Using an Em...
- A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Elderly and Child Pedestrian Crash...
- Segmentation Effect on the Transferability of International Safety Per...
- Application of the Poisson-Tweedie distribution in analyzing crash fre...
- Discussion of theoretical and practical challenges in developing high ...
- Development of Macro-Level Crime and Collision Prediction Models to Su...
- Spatial analysis of macro-level bicycle crashes using the class of con...
- Crash Risk Prediction Modeling Based on the Traffic Conflict Technique...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
