Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Multicriterion Sustainability Assessment in Transportation: Private Cars, Carsharing, and Transit Buses

Abstract

The increase in the number of hybrid electric vehicles and carshare users in the United States in the past decade urges transportation officials to incorporate vehicle characteristics into traditional transportation planning and sustainability assessments. This study updates the state of the art in three main ways: (a) employs a life-cycle approach instead of focusing only on the operation of modes, (b) disaggregates vehicles by type instead of assuming a uniform light-duty vehicle fleet, and (c) assesses conventional and hybrid technologies explicitly for travel mode combinations instead of assuming only fossil fuel–powered vehicles and private cars. The sustainability framework used in this study sets the direction for a multicriterion assessment of urban transportation. Six highway vehicles and modes are analyzed: an internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV), a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV), a carsharing program with ICEVs, a carsharing program with HEVs, a diesel bus, and a hybrid diesel–electric bus. The three travel combinations are developed into three case studies: (a) passenger vehicle only, (b) passenger vehicle and public bus, and (c) carsharing and public bus. The results show that the inclusion of carsharing in the travel mix is the best option. The most sustainable mode, relative to the other five, is found to be carsharing with HEVs. The superior performance of carsharing over transit buses reveals opportunities for new policies in sustainable transportation.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011.
2. 2012 Vehicle Technologies Market Report. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tenn., 2013.
3. U.S. Department of Energy. Hybrid Electric Vehicles Sales by Model. www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/data. Accessed May 10, 2011.
4. Shaheen S. The Sharing Economy: Moving People with Shared Bikes and Cars. Presented at Oregon Transportation Summit, Portland, 2012. www.otrec.us/images/uploads/OTREC_Shaheen_2012.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2013.
5. Shaheen S., Cohen A. P., and Roberts J. D. Carsharing in North America: Market Growth, Current Developments, and Future Potential. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1986, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 116–124.
6. Shaheen S., and Cohen A. P. Worldwide Carsharing Growth: An International Comparison. 2008. www.car-sharing.net/library/UCD-ITS-RR-06-22.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2013.
7. Millard-Ball A., Murray G., ter Schure J., Fox C., and Burkhardt J. TCRP Report 108: Car-Sharing: Where and How It Succeeds. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.
8. Car2go Carsharing. www.car2go.com. Accessed July 20, 2013.
9. Mitropoulos L. K., and Prevedouros P. D. Assessment of Sustainability for Transportation Vehicles. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2344, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 88–97.
10. Black J. A., Paez A., and Suthanaya P. A. Sustainable Urban Transportation: Performance Indicators and Some Analytical Approaches. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 128, No. 4, 2002, pp. 84–209.
11. Jeon C. M., Amekudzi A. A., and Guensler R. L. Sustainability Assessment at the Transportation Planning Level: Performance Measures and Indexes. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
12. Zietsman J., Rilett L. R., and Seung-Jun K. Sustainable Transportation Performance Measures for Developing Communities. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, 2003. www.tti.tamu.edu/. Accessed May 14, 2009.
13. Maoh H., and Kanaroglou P. A Tool for Evaluating Urban Sustainability via Integrated Transportation and Land Use Simulation Models. Urban Environment, Vol. 3, 2009, pp. 28–46.
14. Cabanatuan M. S. F. Experiment to Create Parking for Car Sharing. SFGate, 2013. www.sfgate.com/bayarea/. Accessed July 10, 2013.
15. Pintér L., Hardi P., and Bartelmus P. Sustainable Development Indicators: Proposal for a Way Forward. United Nations Division on Sustainable Development, 2005. www.iisd.org/pdf/2005/measure_indicators_sd_way_forward.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2011.
16. European Council. Transport/Telecommunications: 2340th Council Meeting. Luxembourg, April 2001. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_PRES-01-131_en.htm?locale=en. Accessed Feb. 10, 2009.
17. Renne J. L. Evaluating Transit-Oriented Development Using a Sustainability Framework: Lessons from Perth's Network City. In Planning Sustainable Communities: Diversity of Approaches and Implementation Challenges, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2009, pp. 115–148.
18. Paz A., Maheshwari P., and Kachroo P. Estimation of Performance Indices for the Planning of Sustainable Transportation Systems. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
19. Stasko T. H., Buck A. B., and Gao H. O. Impacts of Carsharing in a University Setting: Changes in Vehicle Ownership, Parking Demand, and Mobility in Ithaca, N Y. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
20. Martin E. W., and Shaheen S. Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carsharing in North America. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2011, pp. 1074–1086.
21. Briceno T., Peters G., Solli C., and Hertwich E. Using Life Cycle Approaches to Evaluate Sustainable Consumption Programs. Industrial Ecology Programme, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2005.
22. Bevan T. A., Donna L., Senner R., and Seskin S. Planning for Sustainability: Planning for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure. Canadian Institute of Transportation Engineers, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2008.
23. Chester M. V., and Horvath A. Environmental Assessment of Passenger Transportation Should Include Infrastructure and Supply Chains. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2009. www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1748-9326/4/2/024008/. Accessed June 16, 2009.
24. Dobranskyte-Niskota A., Perujo A., and Pregl M. Indicators to Assess Sustainability of Transport Activities. Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy, 2007.
25. Pembina Institute. Alberta GPI Blueprint Report. 2001. www.pembina.org. Accessed Sept. 1, 2011.
26. SHRP 2 Report S2-C02-RR: Performance Measurement Framework for Highway Capacity Decision Making. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009.
27. Paving the Way for EU Enlargement: Indicators of Transport and Environment Integration. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2002.
28. Transportation Planning Handbook. ITE, Washington, D.C., 1999.
29. Gilbert R., and Tanguay H. Sustainable Transportation Performance Indicators. Research project. Centre for Sustainable Transportation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2000.
30. Edmunds. www.edmunds.com. Accessed Dec. 5, 2012.
31. Public Transportation Fact Book, 62nd ed. American Public Transportation Association, Washington, D.C., 2011.
32. Davis S. C., Diegel S. W., and Boundy R. G. Transportation Energy Data Book, 30th ed. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Knoxville, Tenn., 2011.
33. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update. 2012. www.eia.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_history.html. Accessed July 4, 2012.
34. Car Buying Tips. Guide to Used Car Auto Auctions. 2010. www.carbuyingtips.com/auto-auctions.htm. Accessed Jan. 15, 2011.
35. Center for Transportation Research. Operating Manual for GREET, Version 1.7. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Ill., 2005.
36. User's Guide to MOBILE 6.1 and MOBILE 6.2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003.
37. Hendrickson C. T., Lave L. B., and Matthews S. H. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input–Output Approach. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 2006.
38. Cowan P. Handbook of Environmental Acoustics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994.
39. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA 10 Gallon per Minute Fuel Dispensing Limit. July 1, 1996. www.epa.gov/oms/regs/ld-hwy/evap/spitback.txt. Accessed May 14, 2012.
40. Toyota Service. www.smg.toyotapartsandservice.com. Accessed May 14, 2011.
41. Chandler K., and Walkowicz N. King County Metro Transit Hybrid Articulated Buses: Final Evaluation Results. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colo., 2006.
42. American Automobile Association. Your Driving Fixed Costs. 2012. www://bit.ly/rikzer. Accessed March 10, 2012.
43. Zipcar. www.zipcar.com. Accessed June 10, 2012.
44. Duvall M. Comparing the Benefits and Impacts of Hybrid Vehicle Options for Compact Sedan and Sport Utility Vehicles. Electrical Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif., 2002.
45. Colliers International. North America, Central Business District, Parking Rate Survey. 2010. www.//downtownhouston.org/site_media/uploads/attachments/2010.0716/ColliersInternational_ParkingRateSurvey2010.pdf. Accessed Jan. 15, 2011.
46. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
47. Zimmerman S. L., and Levinson H. Vehicle Selection for BRT: Issues and Options. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2004, pp. 83–102.
48. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Industry Statistics Sampler: Gasoline Stations. 2002. www.census.gov/. Accessed Dec. 30, 2010.
49. Pohekar S. D., and Ramachandran M. Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Sustainable Energy Planning: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 8, 2009, pp. 365–381.
50. Yoon K. P., and Hwan C. L. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 1995.
51. Zheng J., Atkinson-Palombo C., McCahill C., O'Hara R., and Garrick N. W. Quantifying the Economic Domain of Transportation Sustainability. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2242, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 19–28.
52. FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation. 2011 National Transit Database. http://www.ntdprogram.gov/ntdprogram/.
53. 2009 National Household Travel Survey. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

L. K. Mitropoulos
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2540 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822.
P. D. Prevedouros
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2540 Dole Street, Honolulu, HI 96822.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 241

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 13

  1. The influence of end-of-life regulation on vehicle material circularit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Does car sharing reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Assessing the modal ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Influence of Community Design and Sociodemographic Characteristics on ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Methodology for Multi-criteria Selection of Transportation Technology ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Life cycle environmental assessment of a transition to mobility servit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Life Cycle Assessment for Servitization: A Case Study on Current Mobil...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Comparing Carbon Performances of Mobility Services and Private Vehicle...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. SUP&R DSS: A sustainability-based decision support system for road pav...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Evaluation of Road Transportation Sustainability
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Multi-criteria decision analysis framework for sustainable manufacturi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The Car-Dependent Life
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Rating Systems for Sustainable Transportation: Status and Opportunitie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Designing a multimodal generalised ride sharing system
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub