Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Better Pen-and-Paper Surveys for Transportation Research in Developing Countries: A Modified, Stated Preference, Pivoting Approach

Abstract

In developing countries, the rapid pace of socioeconomic and technological change necessitates the use of quick-response survey methods. Transportation researchers often work with limited budgets in environments with relatively low rates of computer and Internet access. Such conditions can preclude the use of the computer-assisted survey methods that are preferred for conducting research in industrialized countries. This paper describes novel methods for low-cost and high-quality data collection in a data-poor environment. The context is a stated preference (SP) experiment to estimate adoption of bikeshare and electric bikeshare in Beijing, but the methods are transferable. Two main methodological contributions are described. The first is a unique survey design that allows SP pivoting to occur within a single pen-and-paper interview (PAPI). For small- to medium-sized surveys, this design is often more cost-effective than traditional pivoting methods that require either a multistage PAPI survey or computer-assisted interviews. The second contribution is the demonstration of the use of affordable GPS technologies and publicly available data for the purpose of survey protocol enforcement and quality control. The paper describes survey design features that are of particular value for nonmotorized or semimotorized transportation research.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Harzing A. W., Reiche B. S., and Pudelko M. Challenges in International Survey Research: A Review with Illustrations and Suggested Solutions for Best Practice. European Journal of International Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2013, pp. 112–134.
2. Ni M.-C., Cherry C., and Deakin E. Conducting Transportation Survey Research in China: International Research Team Experience and Best Practices. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2317, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 131–140.
3. Langford B. C., Cherry C., Yoon T., Worley S., and Smith D. North America's First E-Bikeshare: A Year of Experience. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2387, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 120–128.
4. Shaheen S. A., Zhang H., Martin E., and Guzman S. China's Hangzhou Public Bicycle: Understanding Early Adoption and Behavioral Response to Bikesharing. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2247, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 33–41.
5. Adler T., Falzarano C. S., and Spitz G. Modeling Service Trade-Offs in Air Itinerary Choices. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1915, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 20–26.
6. Hess S., Adler T., and Polak J. W. Modeling Airport and Airline Choice Behavior with the Use of Stated Preference Survey Data. Transport Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2007, pp. 221–233.
7. Yang C.-W., and Sung Y.-C. Constructing a Mixed-Logit Model with Market Positioning to Analyze the Effects of New Mode Introduction. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2010, pp. 175–182.
8. Chiu Y.-C., and Tzeng G.-H. The Market Acceptance of Electric Motorcycles in Taiwan—Experience Through a Stated Preference Analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1999, pp. 127–146.
9. Zito P., Amato G., Amoroso S., and Berrittella M. The Effect of Advanced Traveller Information Systems on Public Transport Demand and Its Uncertainty. Transportmetrica, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2009, pp. 31–43.
10. Louviere J. J., Hensher D. A., and Swait J. D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000.
11. Wardman M. A Comparison of Revealed Preference and Stated Preference Models of Travel Behaviour. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1988, pp. 71–91.
12. Swait J., Louviere J. J., and Williams M. A Sequential Approach to Exploiting the Combined Strengths of SP and RP Data: Application to Freight Shipper Choice. Transportation, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1994, pp. 135–152.
13. Hensher D. A., Rose J. M., and Greene W. H. Combining RP and SP Data: Biases in Using the Nested Logit “Trick”—Contrasts with Flexible Mixed Logit Incorporating Panel and Scale Effects. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2008, pp. 126–133.
14. Hensher D. A., and Rose J. M. Development of Commuter and Non-Commuter Mode Choice Models for the Assessment of New Public Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Case Study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2007, pp. 428–443.
15. Starmer C. Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice Under Risk. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2000, pp. 332–382.
16. Train K., and Wilson W. W. Estimation on Stated-Preference Experiments Constructed from Revealed-Preference Choices. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2008, pp. 191–203.
17. Cherchi E. Modeling Individual Preferences, State of the Art, Recent Advances and Future Directions. Proc., 12th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Jaipur, India, 2009.
18. Mackie P., Fowkes T., Wardman M., Whelan G., and Bates J. Three Controversies in the Valuation of Travel Time Savings. In Proc., AET European Transport Conference, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2001.
19. Rose J. M., Bliemer M. C. J., Hensher D. A., and Collins T. Designing Efficient Stated Choice Experiments in the Presence of Reference Alternatives. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2008, pp. 395–406.
20. Fafchamps M., McKenzie D., Quinn S., and Woodruff C. Using PDA Consistency Checks to Increase the Precision of Profits and Sales Measurement in Panels. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 98, No. 1, 2012, pp. 51–57.
21. Arentze T., Bos I., Molin E., and Timmermans H. Internet-Based Travel Surveys: Selected Evidence on Response Rates, Sampling Bias and Reliability. Transportmetrica, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2005, pp. 193–207.
22. International Telecommunication Union. Key ICT Indicators for Developed and Developing Countries and the World. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, 2013.
23. Caeyers B., Chalmers N., and De Weerdt J. Improving Consumption Measurement and Other Survey Data Through CAPI: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 98, No. 1, 2012, pp. 19–33.
24. Gebhart K., and Noland R. B. The Impact of Weather Conditions on Capital Bikeshare Trips. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.
25. Buehler R. Trip-End Facilities at Work and Bicycle Commuting in the Washington, D.C., Region. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.
26. Cherry C., and Cervero R. Use Characteristics and Mode Choice Behavior of Electric Bike Users in China. Transport Policy, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2007, pp. 247–257.
27. Jones L. R., Cherry C. R., Vu T. A., and Nguyen Q. N. Estimating the Effect of Incentives on the Adoption of Electric Scooters: A Stated Choice Experiment in Vietnam. 2011. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856413001675.
28. Cherry C., and Jones L. Electric Two-Wheelers in India and Viet Nam. Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines, 2009.
29. Guo J., and Li X. Beijing City Annual Transportation Development Report. Beijing Transportation Development Research Center, Beijing, 2011.
30. Haase D., Weerd M. D., and Mohme T. BT747. 2012. Available from: http://www.bt747.org.
31. OSM Community. Open Street Map. 2012. http://www.openstreetmap.org/. Accessed July 22, 2012.
32. ESRI. ArcGIS Editor for OSM 2.0 Final, 2012.
33. GRASS GIS. GRASS GIS. 2013. http://grass.osgeo.org/. Accessed April 2013.
34. Google Earth. Importing Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Data in Google Earth. 2013. http://www.google.com/earth/outreach/tutorials/importgps.html. Accessed Apr. 22, 2013.
35. Wei S. US Citizen Arrested for Illegal Mapping. In China Daily, March 7, 2012.
36. National Bureau of Statistics of China. The Sixth National Population Census. National Bureau of Statistics of China, Beijing, 2010.
37. Liu M. Beijing, the First 2000 Public Bikes Achieve Cross-District Check In and Check Out. 2012. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2012-06/17/content_2162759.htm. Accessed October 20, 2012.
38. Campbell A. Factors Influencing the Choice of Shared Bikes and Electric Bikes in Beijing. December 2012. http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1364/.
39. Midgley P. Bicycle-Sharing Schemes: Enhancing Sustainable Mobility in Urban Areas. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Andrew A. Campbell
University of California, Berkeley, 109 McLaughlin Hall, MC1720, Berkeley, CA 94720-1720.
Christopher Cherry
University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 110A Perkins Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996-2010.
Megan Ryerson
University of Pennsylvania, 102 Meyerson Hall, 210 South 34th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Luke Jones
Valdosta State University, 111 Pound Hall, Valdosta, GA 31698-0076.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 97

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 9

  1. Adverse Childhood Experiences, Intimate Partner Violence, and Mental W...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Investigation of shared micromobility preference for last-mile travel ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. People with disabilities’ perceptions of autonomous vehicles as a viab...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Predicting the Likelihood of Using Car-Sharing in the Greater Cairo Me...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Electric vehicles, air pollution, and the motorcycle city: A stated pr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Carsharing demand estimation and fleet simulation with EV adoption
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. One-way and round-trip carsharing: A stated preference experiment in B...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Potential for revival of the bicycle in Beijing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Factors influencing the choice of shared bicycles and shared electric ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub