Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Long-Distance Work and Leisure Travel Frequencies: Ordered Probit Analysis Across Non–Distance-Based Definitions

Abstract

The objective of this research was to isolate the factors influencing non–distance-based definitions of long-distance travel to help long-distance survey makers know which demographic factors they should query about in their surveys. Instead of the use of a distance-based threshold to define long-distance travel, this study included variations in purpose (e.g., work travel or leisure or personal travel), durations (e.g., overnight trips), modes (e.g., intercity rail or bus), and destinations (e.g., inter national travel) to consider which demographic, employment, commute, household, and geographic factors affected the frequency of longdistance travel. The data were from self-reported retrospective surveys collected from approximately 1,200 participants. Results from ordered probit analysis revealed that education and income generally increased most types of long-distance travel, whereas having a spouse or children decreased some types of long-distance travel. In general, limited factors had the same impact on the work and non–work travel and modes used. Factors also varied by trip type. Commute and employment factors were valuable even for non–work trip frequency estimation. The findings suggest that future data collection for long-distance travel can be tailored to address the specific definition being studied.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Bhat C. R., Guo J. Y., Srinivasan S., and Sivakumar A. Comprehensive Econometric Microsimulator for Daily Activity–Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 57–66.
2. Pendyala R. M., Kitamura R., Kikuchi A., Yamamoto T., and Fujii S. Florida Activity Mobility Simulator: Overview and Preliminary Validation Results. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1921, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 123–130.
3. Miller E. J. The Trouble with Intercity Travel Demand Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1895, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 94–101.
4. Henderson J., and Trani A. A. Temporal Transferability of Long-Distance Trip Rates. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
5. Zhang L., Southworth F., Xiong C., and Sonnenberg A. Methodological Options and Data Sources for the Development of Long-Distance Passenger Travel Demand Models: A Comprehensive Review. Transport Reviews, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2012, pp. 399–433.
6. Steiner R., and Cho H. Florida Long-Distance Travel Characteristics and Their Potential Impacts on the Transportation System. University of Florida Center for Multimodal Solutions for Congestion Mitigation, Gainesville, March 15, 2013.
7. Resource Systems Group. Utah Travel Study. Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City, Jan. 2013. http://www.wfrc.org/new_wfrc/publications/Utah_FinalReport_130228.pdf. Accessed July 2013.
8. Zhang L., and Krause C. Using Activity Space to Define and Analyze Long-Distance Passenger Travel. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.
9. LaMondia J., and Bhat C. A Conceptual and Methodological Framework of Leisure Activity Loyalty Accommodating the Travel Context. Transportation, Vol. 39, No. 2, March 2012, pp. 321–349.
10. Bricka S., and Sabina E. Evaluation of Key Design Elements of Long-Distance Survey of Front Range Travel Counts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2285, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 110–118.
11. Axhausen K. Social Networks and Travel: Some Hypotheses. In Social Dimensions of Sustainable Transport: Transatlantic Perspectives (Donaghy K. P., Poppelreuter S., and Rudinger G., eds.), University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany, 2005, pp. 90–108.
12. Pisarski A. E. New NCHRP–TCRP Report: TR News, No. 247, November–December 2006, pp. 26–29.
13. Special Report 277: Measuring Personal Travel and Goods Movement: A Review of the Bureau of Transportation Statistics’ Surveys. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
14. Special Report 304: How We Travel: A Sustainable National Program for Travel Data. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011.
15. Moeckel R., Fussell R., and Donnelly R. Mode Choice Modeling for Long-Distance Travel. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.
16. Georggi N. L., and Pendyala R. M. Analysis of Long-Distance Travel Behavior of the Elderly and Low Income. In Transportation Research Circular E-C026: Personal Travel: The Long and Short of It, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 121–150.
17. Jin X., and Horowitz A. J. Time-of-Day Choice Modeling for Long-Distance Trips. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2076, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 200–208.
18. Bricka S. Variations in Long-Distance Travel. In Transportation Research Circular E-C026: Personal Travel: The Long and Short of It, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 197–206.
19. Dargay J. M., and Clark S. The Determinants of Long-Distance Travel in Great Britain. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 46, No. 3, March 2012, pp. 576–587.
20. Schiffer R. G. NCHRP Report 735: Long-Distance and Rural Travel Transferable Parameters for Statewide Travel Forecasting Models. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012.
21. McKenzie B. Out-of-State and Long Commutes: 2011. American Community Survey Reports. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Feb. 2013.
22. Gustafson P. Managing Business Travel: Developments and Dilemmas in Corporate Travel Management. Tourism Management, Vol. 33, No. 2, April 2012, pp. 276–284.
23. Gustafson P. Work-Related Travel, Gender and Family Obligations. Work, Employment and Society, Sept. 2006, Vol. 20, Issue 23, pp. 513–530.
24. Presser H. B., and Hermsen J. M. Gender Differences in the Determinants of Work-Related Overnight Travel Among Employed Americans. Work and Occupations, Vol. 23, No. 1, Feb. 1996, pp. 87–115.
25. Jeong Y.-J., Zvonkovic A. M., Sano Y., and Acock A. C. The Occurrence and Frequency of Overnight Job Travel in the USA. Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 27, Feb. 2013, pp. 138–152.
26. LaMondia J., Bhat C. R., and Hensher D. A. An Annual Time Use Model for Domestic Vacation Travel. Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2008, pp. 70–97.
27. Van Nostrand C., Pinjari A. R., and Sivaraman V. A Household-Level Annual, Long-Distance, Vacation Travel Demand Model: A Multiple Discrete-Continuous Choice Framework. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
28. Anderson B. B., and Langmeyer L. The Under-50 and Over-50 Travelers: A Profile of Similarities and Differences. Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 20, 1982, pp. 20–24.
29. Hsieh S., O'Leary J. T., Morrison A. M., and Chlang D. Travel Decision Pattern Segmentation of Pleasure Travel. Journal of Vacation Marketing, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1997, pp. 289–302.
30. Castro C., Armario E., and Ruiz D. The Influence of Market Heterogeneity on the Relationship Between a Destination's Image and Tourists’ Future Behaviour. Tourism Management, Vol. 28, 2007, pp. 175–187.
31. Limatanakool N., Dijst M., and Schwanen T. On the Participation in Medium- and Long-Distance Travel: A Decomposition Analysis for the UK and the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 97, No. 4, 2006, pp. 389–404.
32. Mallett W. J. Long-Distance Travel by Low-Income Households. In Transportation Research Circular E-C026: Personal Travel: The Long and Short of It, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 169–177.
33. Rural Health Research Center. Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington. http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/. Accessed July 2013.
34. National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) Reports. FAA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/npias/reports/. Accessed July 2013.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jeffrey J. LaMondia
Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University, 238 Harbert Engineering Center, Auburn, AL 36849-5337.
Lisa Aultman-Hall
Transportation Research Center, University of Vermont, 210 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT 05405.
Elizabeth Greene
Resource Systems Group, Inc., 41 North Rio Grande Street, Suite 106, Salt Lake City, UT 84101.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 201

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 14

  1. Exploring Spatial Nonstationarity in Determinants of Intercity Commuti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Long-distance travel in tension with everyday mobility of urbanites – ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Who (never) makes overnight leisure trips? Disentangling structurally ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Characteristics of Middle European Holiday Highfliers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Exploring Travel Patterns during the Holiday Season—A Case Study of Sh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Person-Based Micro-Simulation Demand Model for National Long-Distance ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Comparing alternative methods of collecting self-assessed overnight lo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Preferences for long-distance coach transport: Evidence from a discret...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Why do they live so far from work? Determinants of long-distance commu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Exploring the Self-Reported Long-Distance Travel Frequency of Millenni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Travel Model Blind Spots: Importance of Understanding Special Markets ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Typology of Travelers Based on Their Annual Intercity Travel Patterns ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. On the distance travelled for woodland leisure via different transport...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Agent-based modelling of the spatial pattern of leisure visitation in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub