Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Choice, Frequency, and Engagement: Framework for Telecommuting Behavior Analysis and Modeling

Abstract

This paper presents a multistage approach to the examination of telecommuting behavior to establish a better framework for prediction of the likelihood and frequency of telecommuting. The approach took into account three main aspects of telecommuting behavior: (a) telecommuting choice, which considered whether the respondents telecommuted on a regular basis; (b) telecommuting frequency, which measured the intensity of telecommuting on the basis of the number of hours that respondents telecommuted weekly; and (c) telecommuting engagement, which focused on individuals’ daily behavior. The hypothesis was that decisions on telecommuting frequency were made as part of the household mobility arrangement beyond the daily choice framework and that once the frequency was known, the choice to engage in telecommuting could be estimated with greater accuracy. A general framework was developed to reflect the various telecommuting arrangements. Cluster analysis was applied to the data to identify proper frequency categories. Probit models were developed to estimate individuals’ choices at the three stages. The model also considered the actual behavior of nonregular telecommuters on a random day. This paper contributes to the literature by not only providing a comprehensive analysis of the factors contributing to telecommuting choices at various stages but also exploring the relationships between telecommuting frequency as a lifestyle arrangement and engagement in telecommuting as a short-term daily choice.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Ye X., Konduri K., Pendyala R. M., and Sana B. Formulation of an Activity-Based Utility Measure of Time Use: Application to Understanding the Influence of Constraints. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2135, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 60–68.
2. Pendyala R. M., Goulias K., and Kitamura R. Impact of Telecommuting on Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Household Travel. Transportation, Vol. 18, 1991, pp. 383–409.
3. Khan M., Paleti R., Bhat C. R., and Pendyala R. M. Joint Household-Level Analysis of Individuals’ Work Arrangement Choices. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2323, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 56–66.
4. Mokhtarian P. L., and Salomon I. Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting 3: Identifying the Choice Set and Estimating Binary Choice Models for Technology-Based Alternatives. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 28, 1996, pp. 1877–1894.
5. Yen J.-R., and Mahmassani H. S. Telecommuting Adoption: Conceptual Framework and Model Estimation. In Transportation Research Record 1606, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 95–102.
6. Drucker J., and Khattak A. J. Propensity to Work from Home: Modeling Results from the 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1706, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 108–117.
7. Vana P., Bhat C. R., and Mokhtarian P. L. On Modeling the Choices of Work-Hour Arrangement, Location and Frequency of Telecommuting. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
8. Zhou L. Modeling the Impacts of an Employer Based Travel Demand Management Program on Commute Travel Behavior. PhD dissertation. University of South Florida, Tampa, 2008.
9. Jin X., and Wu J. Telecommute Behavior and Implications on Modeling. Presented at 4th Transportation Research Board Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling, Tampa, Fla., April 2012. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conferences/2012/4thITM/PPT/11a-Jin.pdf.
10. Popuri Y. D., and Bhat C. R. On Modeling Choice and Frequency of Home-Based Telecommuting. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1858, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 55–60.
11. Wernik S. J. Telecommuting: Working from Home in the 21st Century. MS thesis. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2004.
12. Walls M., Safirova E., and Jiang Y. What Drives Telecommuting? Relative Impact of Worker Demographics, Employer Characteristics, and Job Types. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2010, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 111–120.
13. Tang W., Mokhtarian P. L., and Handy S. L. The Role of Neighborhood Characteristics in the Adoption and Frequency of Working at Home: Empirical Evidence from Northern California. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-08-2. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 2008.
14. Sener I. N., and Bhat C. R. A Copula-Based Sample Selection Model of Telecommuting Choice and Frequency. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2011, pp. 126–145.
15. Sener I. N., and Reeder P. R. An Examination of Behavioral Linkages Across ICT Choice Dimensions: Copula Modeling of Telecommuting and Teleshopping Choice Behavior. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 44, 2012, pp. 1459–1478.
16. Martens M. J., and Korver W. Forecasting and Assessing the Mobility Effects of Teleservices: Scenario Approach. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1706, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 118–125.
17. Singh P., Paleti R., Jenkins S., and Bhat C. R. On Modeling Telecommuting Behavior: Option, Choice, and Frequency. Transportation, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2013, pp. 373–396.
18. Mokhtarian P. L., Salomon I., and Choo S. Data and Measurement Issues in Transportation, with Telecommuting as Case Study. Report UCD-ITS-RR-04-29. University of California, Davis, 2004.
19. Mokhtarian P. L. Telecommunications and Travel. In Transportation in the New Millennium, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/millennium/00115.pdf.
20. Jin X., and Wu J. Propensity to Telecommute: Exploring the National Household Travel Survey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2231, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 110–119.
21. Mokhtarian P. L., Collantes G. O., and Gertz C. Telecommuting, Residential Location and Commute Distance Travelled: Evidence from State of California Employees. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 36, No. 10, 2004, pp. 1877–1897.
22. Zhu P. Telecommuting Travel Behavior and Residential Location Choice: Can Telecommuting Be an Effective Policy to Reduce Travel Demand? PhD dissertation. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 2011.
23. Zhu P. Are Telecommuting and Personal Travel Complements or Substitutes? Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2012, pp. 619–639.
24. Jiang Y. Two Empirical Essays in Environmental and Urban Economics. PhD dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park, 2008.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hamidreza Asgari
EC3725, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, Miami, FL 33174.
Xia Jin
EC3603, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, 10555 West Flagler Street, Miami, FL 33174.
Ali Mohseni
New York Metropolitan Transportation Council, 199 Water Street, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10038.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 251

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 20

  1. Impacts of COVID-19 on Future Preferences Toward Telework
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Perception of the Effects of Working from Home on Isolation and Stress...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. What happens when post-secondary programmes go virtual for COVID-19? E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Exploring the endogenous effects among car dependency, work arrangemen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The COVID-19 pandemic and the future of telecommuting in the United St...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Examining the persistence of telecommuting after the COVID-19 pandemic
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Choices of Potential Car Buyers Regarding Alternative Fuel Vehicles in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. To go, or not to go? Modelling the effects of employment decentralisat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Telework benefits and associated health problems during the long COVID...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Predicting Work-Life Conflict: Types and Levels of Enacted and Preferr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Unveiling daily activity pattern differences between telecommuters and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. The New Normal? Motivators for and Hindrances to Telework
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. A work-life conflict perspective on telework
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Using virtual accessibility and physical accessibility as joint predic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. An evaluation of part-day telecommute impacts on work trip departure t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. An investigation of tour generation models combining two waves of hous...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Analysis of the Electric Vehicles Adoption over the United States
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Examination of the Impacts of Telecommuting on the Time Use of Nonmand...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Generalized Extreme Value models for count data: Application to worker...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Toward a Comprehensive Telecommuting Analysis Framework...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub