Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Development of Rail Service Sensitivity Meter

Abstract

Understanding passenger expectations is a major task for rail transit operators so that they can determine necessary service improvements and the need to undertake new resource planning projects. Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA), the commuter rail operator in Taiwan, is seeking an approach to identify customer expectations by types of services and by region. Level of service (LOS) as defined by the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (TCQSM) is a widely used approach to evaluate the performance of transit services. However, predefined thresholds from the TCQSM used to evaluate service quality without knowing customer expectations may not reflect actual passenger satisfaction. In this study, a rail service sensitivity meter (RSSM) was developed to measure passenger expectations accurately and quantitatively and to determine acceptable levels of rail service. The RSSM was implemented in the empirical study to determine passenger expectations in regard to an acceptable LOS obtained through the process. Results of the empirical study set the benchmarks of service quality attributes and indicate that TRA service performance is generally acceptable, but TRA should focus on improvements to passenger load during peak hours by lengthening current trains with additional seats or by providing additional train services. Through the RSSM process, operators can evaluate the gap between expected services and actual services as well as improve the system to ensure customer satisfaction.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Cao C., and Chen J. An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship among the Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty of High Speed Railway Based on Structural Equation Model. Canadian Social Science, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2011, pp. 67–73.
2. Jen W., and Hu K. C. Application of Perceived Value Model to Identify Factors Affecting Passengers’ Repurchase Intentions on City Bus: A Case of the Taipei Metropolitan Area. Transportation, Vol. 30, 2003, pp. 307–327.
3. Teng H. Y. Customer Loyalty in Taiwan Railway Administration. MS thesis. National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan, 2007.
4. Tseng K. C. The Research of Relationship among Service Quality, Customer Satisfactions and Reride Intentions in Taiwan Railway Administration—a Case Study of Megalopolitan Stations. MS thesis. Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City, Taiwan, 2006.
5. Lai Y.-C., Shih M.-C., and Jong J.-C. Railway Capacity Model and Decision Support Process for Strategic Capacity Planning. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2197, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 19–28.
6. Lai Y.-C., and Wang S.-H. Development of Analytical Capacity Models for Conventional Railways with Advanced Signaling Systems. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 138, No. 7, 2012, pp. 961–974.
7. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V. A., and Berry L. L. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, No. 4, 1985, pp. 41–50.
8. Churchill G. A. Jr., and Surprenant C. An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1982, pp. 491–504.
9. Grönroos C. A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1984, pp. 36–44.
10. Kittelson & Associates, Inc., KFH Group, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglass, Inc., and K. Hunter-Zaworski. TCRP Report 100: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
11. Botzow H. Level-of-Service Concept for Evaluating Public Transport. In Transportation Research Record 519, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1974, pp. 73–84.
12. Alter C. H. Evaluation of Public Transit Services: The Level-of-Service Concept. In Transportation Research Record 606, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976, pp. 37–40.
13. VanWestendorp P. H. NSS-Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM)—A New Approach to Study Consumer Perception of Price. Proc., 29th ESOMAR Congress, Venice, Italy, 1976.
14. Kishi K., Takahashi Y., Hara F., and Satoh K. Level of Snow Removal Service and Residents’ Willingness to Pay: Evaluation for Four Japanese Cities. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1794, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 72–76.
15. Kishi K., and Satoh K. Evaluation of Willingness to Buy a Low-Pollution Car in Japan. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, 2005, pp. 3121–3134.
16. He J., and Liu Z. Transfer Convenience of Urban Rail Transit Based on Passengers’ Physical and Conscious Resistance. Proc., IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, 2008, Beijing, pp. 1536–1540.
17. Lipovestsky S., Magnan S., and Polzi A. Z. Pricing Models in Marketing Research. Intelligent Information Management, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2011, pp. 167–174.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jyh-Chemg Jong
Civil and Hydraulic Engineering and Railway Transportation Research Center, Sinotech Engineering Consultants, Inc., No. 280 Xinhu 2nd Road. Neihu District, Taipei City 114, Taiwan.
Yung-Cheng (Rex) Lai
Railway Technology Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University. Room 313, Civil Engineering Building, No. 1 Roosevelt Road, Section 4, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Shao-Wei Wang
Railway Technology Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University. Room 313, Civil Engineering Building, No. 1 Roosevelt Road, Section 4, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Sheng-Hsuan Huang
Civil and Hydraulic Engineering and Railway Transportation Research Center, Sinotech Engineering Consultants, Inc., No. 280 Xinhu 2nd Road. Neihu District, Taipei City 114, Taiwan.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 25

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub