Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Quantifying Transportation Benefits of Transit-Oriented Development in New Jersey

Abstract

The cost of transportation plays an important role in residential location choice. Reducing transportation costs not only benefits the user but also improves the performance of the system as a whole. A direct impact of transit-oriented development (TOD) is the change in out-of-pocket costs for users, as well as the changes in costs of externalities and agency benefits. The prime mover for these changes is the shift in population when a TOD is built near train stations and the induced mode shifts from driving to transit. In this study several sites throughout New Jersey were evaluated to determine the cost of driving versus the cost of using rail transit to major employment destinations in New Jersey and New York City. Driving costs were composed of vehicle operating costs (including fuel, wear and tear, and depreciation), value of time based on the highway travel time from origin to destination, parking cost, and cost of externalities such as air and noise pollution, road maintenance, and accidents. Transit costs were composed of fares, parking costs, and values of travel time, waiting time, and transfer time. The likely changes in population resulting from the TOD were used to estimate changes in highway and transit trips. The costs were compared to derive the net benefit for transportation system users as a result of the TOD. Generally, TOD results in financial benefits to the user and the transportation system.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Cervero R. Alternative Approaches to Modeling the Travel-Demand Impacts of Smart Growth. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2006, pp. 285–295.
2. Burchell R. W., and Mukherji S. Conventional Development Versus Managed Growth: The Costs of Sprawl. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 91, No. 9, 2003, pp. 1534–1540.
3. Weisbrod G., Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S. Tradeoffs in Residential Location Decisions: Transportation Versus Other Factors. Transportation Policy and Decision-Making, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1980.
4. Salon D. Cars and the City: An Investigation of Transportation and Residential Location Choices in New York City. PhD dissertation. University of California, Davis, 2006.
5. Srour I. M., Kockelman K. M., and Dunn T. P. Accessibility Indices: Connection to Residential Land Prices and Location Choices. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 25–34.
6. de Palma A., Motamedi K., Picard N., and Waddell P. A Model of Residential Location Choice with Endogenous Housing Prices and Traffic for the Paris Region. European Transport/Trasporti Europei, Vol. 31, 2005, pp. 67–82.
7. Cervero R. St. Louis MetroLink South Ridership Forecasts: Second Revised Estimates for Modified Alignments Using Local and National “Direct” Ridership Forecasting Models. HNTB, Inc., Kansas City, Mo., 2004.
8. Cervero R. Methodology and Results for Forecasting Year 2025 Ridership among Three Land-Use Scenarios: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Transit-Land Use Plan. LDR International, Inc., Columbia, Md., 1998.
9. Cervero R. Transit-Oriented Development's Ridership Bonus: A Product of Self-Selection and Public Policies. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 39, No. 9, 2007, pp. 2068–2085.
10. Kaneko Y., and Fukuda A. The Combined Trip Distribution, Modal Split and Traffic Assignment Equilibrium Model to Evaluate the Transit Oriented Development Policy. Presented at 10th World Conference on Transport Research, Istanbul, Turkey, 2004.
11. Zhang M., and Yi C. Can Transit Oriented Developments Reduce Austin's Traffic Congestion? SWUTC/06/167869–1. Southwest Region University Transportation Center, College Station, Tex., 2006.
12. Zhang M. Can Transit-Oriented Development Reduce Peak-Hour Congestion? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2174, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 148–155.
13. Ozbay K., Yanmaz-Tuzel O., Mudigonda S., Bartin B., and Berechman J. Cost of Transporting People in New Jersey Phase 2. FHWA/NJ-2007–003. New Jersey Department of Transportation for FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.
14. Benefit-Cost and Job Creation/Economic Stimulus Analyses: Bloom-field Center Gateway and Access Improvements. Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory, TIGER II Discretionary Grants Program, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2010.
15. Ozbay K., Bartin B., Mudigonda S., and Iyer S. ASSIST-ME: Post-Processing Tool for Transportation Planning Model Output. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2399, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 63–73.
16. URS Corporation, Citilabs, AECOM, I. PB Americas, Urbitran Associates, Gallop Corporation, and Paragon. North Jersey Regional Transportation Model Enhanced-Model Development Report. North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority, Newark, N.J., 2008.
17. URS Corporation. North Jersey Regional Transportation Model Enhanced-Users Guide Part 1. North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority, Newark, N.J., 2008.
18. URS Corporation. North Jersey Regional Transportation Model Enhanced–Users Guide Part 2. North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority, Newark, N.J., 2008.
19. Ozbay K., Bartin B., and Berechman J. Estimation and Evaluation of Full Marginal Costs of Highway Transportation in New Jersey. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2001, pp. 81–103.
20. Ozbay K., Yanmaz-Tuzel O., Mudigonda S., and Bartin B. Evaluating Highway Capacity Investments Using a Geographic Information Systems-Based Tool: Trip-Based Full Marginal Cost Approach. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2024, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 44–53.
21. Small K. A., and Verhoef E. T. The Economics of Urban Transportation. Routledge, New York, 2007.
22. Table 1. Summary: Mean Hourly Earnings (1) and Weekly Hours for Selected Worker and Establishment Characteristics, New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA CSA, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, 2009.
23. Yanmaz-Tuzel O., Ozbay K., and Holguin-Veras J. Value of Travel Time Estimation Using Hierarchical Bayesian Mixed Logit Approach: Toll Facilities in New York and New Jersey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2187, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 85–96.
24. Noland R. B., Ozbay K., and DiPetrillo S. Measuring the Benefits of Transit-Oriented Development. New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, 2013.
25. Wardman M. A Review of British Evidence on Time and Service Quality Valuations. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 37, No. 2/3, 2001, pp. 107–128.
26. Liu R., Pendyala R. M., and Polzin S. Assessment of Intermodal Transfer Penalties Using Stated Preference Data. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 74–80.
27. Ozguven E. E., Ozbay K., and Iyer S. A Simplified Emissions Estimation Methodology Based on MOVES to Estimate Vehicle Emissions from Transportation Assignment and Simulation Models. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sandeep Mudigonda
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers University, 96 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Kaan Ozbay
Department of Civil and Urban Engineering and Center for Urban Science and Progress, New York University, 1 Metrotech Center, 19th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201.
Ozgur Ozturk
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers University, 96 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Shrisan Iyer
New York City Transit, 2 Broadway, Cubicle A17–90, New York, NY 10004.
Robert B. Noland
Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, E. J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, 33 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 234

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 10

  1. Transit Benefit Index: A Comprehensive Index for Capturing Externaliti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Transit-Oriented Development in Saudi Arabia: Riyadh as a Case Study
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Land Use Optimization Based on Transit-Oriented Development with Linea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Evaluating the impacts of transit-oriented developments (TODs) on hous...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Institute of Transportation Engineers Guidelines versus Actual Trip an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Is Labour Productivity Higher in Transit Oriented Development Areas? A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Optimizing Land Use Allocation of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. A Twenty-Five-Year Biography of the TOD Concept: From Design to Policy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. A systematic review of the dimensions of transit-oriented urban planni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. “Transit Oriented Development and Its Impact on Level of Service of Ro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub