Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Examining the Characteristics of Intercity Bus Passengers in Michigan

Abstract

The Michigan Department of Transportation (DOT) supports a state-wide network of intercity bus services, including five routes operated under the FTA Section 5311 (f) program. To assist with planning activities for the state's intercity bus network, the Michigan DOT conducted an onboard survey of intercity bus passengers in the state in spring 2011. The Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) was retained to analyze the 533 surveys obtained from this effort. This paper presents the results of the TTI analysis of the Michigan DOT spring 2011 intercity bus surveys. The survey results showed that three-quarters of the intercity bus passengers were from urban areas and the remaining one-quarter were from rural areas. Most passengers were traveling for personal reasons such as visits to family or friends or vacation. One-third of the surveyed passengers were from zero-vehicle households. If the bus service were not available, 59% of the passengers would drive, 19% would use an airplane, and 22% would not make the trip. Of zero-vehicle households, 31% of passengers would not make the trip; this result indicated a key role for the intercity bus service in supporting personal mobility. Other demographic groups that benefitted from the service included females and persons with annual household income less than $20,000; both groups had a higher propensity not to make the trip in the absence of the bus service. The findings from the survey suggested that the Michigan intercity bus network was a critical transportation option for residents and visitors in the state and that bus passenger onboard surveys provided valuable information to support planning efforts.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. FTA. Formula Grants for Other than Urbanized Areas. FTA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. http://www.fta.dot.gov/grants/13093_3555.html. Accessed July 30, 2013.
2. Sperry B. R., and Morgan C. A. Analysis of the 2011 Michigan DOT Intercity Rail and Bus Passenger Surveys. Prepared for the Michigan Department of Transportation by the Texas Transportation Institute, 2012.
3. Kuehne R. L., and Hundt K. A. Michigan Intercity Rail Passenger Study and Intercity Bus User Comparison. In Transportation Research Record 1177, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 26–39.
4. Levine J., and Penders T. Intercity Train and Bus Passenger Study. Prepared for the Michigan Department of Transportation by the Urban and Regional Research Collaborative, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2002.
5. Grengs J., Hu C., and Weitz M. Intercity Bus and Passenger Rail Study. Prepared for the Michigan Department of Transportation, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 2009.
6. HDR Engineering, Inc. Kansas Statewide Intercity Bus Study. Prepared for the Kansas Department of Transportation, 2012.
7. KFH Group, Inc. Minnesota Intercity Bus Network Study: Final Report. Prepared for the Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2010.
8. Ye Z., Kack D., Chaudhari J., and Ewan L. Montana Intercity Bus Study. Prepared for the Montana Department of Transportation by the Western Transportation Institute, 2011.
9. Current Transportation Solutions. Rimrock Stages Transportation Development Plan 2011–2016. http://rimrocktrailways.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/rimrock-fmal-tdpl.pdf. Accessed Nov. 15, 2013.
10. Yang H., and Cherry C. R. Statewide Rural-Urban Bus Travel Demand and Network Evaluation: An Application in Tennessee. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2012, pp. 97–111.
11. Michigan Department of Transportation. Michigan Public Transit Facts. http://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,4616,7-151-9625_21607-34128-,00.html. Accessed March 14, 2014.
12. Michigan Department of Transportation. All Five Intercity Bus Routes Show Ridership Growth in Michigan. Office of Communications, Michigan Department of Transportation. http://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,4616,7-151-9620_11057-265808-RSS,00.html. Accessed Nov. 17, 2011.
13. Schwieterman J. P., Antolin B., Largen P., and Schultz M. The Motor Coach Metamorphosis: 2012 Year-in-Review of Intercity Bus Service in the United States. Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, DePaul University, 2013.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Benjamin R. Sperry
Department of Civil Engineering, Ohio University, Stocker Center 146, 1 Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701–2979.
Jeffery E. Warner
Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843–3135.
Robert G. Pearson, II
Intercity Bus Operating and Capital Program, Office of Passenger Transportation, Michigan Department of Transportation, 425 West Ottawa Street, P.O. Box 30050, Lansing, Ml 48909.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 44

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Investigating the Relationship Between Access to Intercity Bus Transpo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Preferences for long-distance coach transport: Evidence from a discret...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Estimating demand for rural intercity bus services
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Users’ demographic profile and quality attributes of bus services: The...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub