Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Analytical Derivation of Capacity at Diverging Junctions

Abstract

Freeway congestion occurs mainly at discontinuities of the road network, such as merges, weaving sections, and diverges. Reliable tools are needed for estimating the operations at these discontinuities and evaluating their capacity. This paper proposes an analytical model that estimates the capacity at a diverging junction according to the kinematic wave theory of Lighthill, Whitham, and Richards. The model assumes that exiting vehicles drive temporarily at a speed that is lower than the free-flow speed. The slow vehicles are considered moving bottlenecks. In the methodology, the acceleration is assumed to be infinite in a first step. But, because it is a key factor in explaining the capacity drop, this assumption is relaxed in a second step through a constant acceleration rate used for all the vehicles. In this study, the moving bottleneck theory is used to compute the effective flow passing the diverging junction and the corresponding relative capacity drop. The analytical results are assessed with microsimulation results.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Daganzo C. F., Laval J., and Muñoz J. C. Ten Strategies for Freeway Congestion Mitigation with Advanced Technologies. California PATH, University of California, Berkeley, 2002.
2. Gunther G. E., Coeymans J. E., Muñoz J. C., and Herrera J. C. Mitigating Freeway Off-Ramp Congestion: A Surface Streets Coordinated Approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 20, No. 1. 2012, pp. 112–125.
3. Newell G. F. A Simplified Theory of Kinematic Waves in Highway Traffic. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1993, pp. 281–313.
4. Muñoz J. C., and Daganzo C. F. The Bottleneck Mechanism of a Freeway Diverge. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 36. No. 6, 2002, pp. 483–505.
5. Daganzo C. F., Cassidy M. J., and Bertini R. L. Possible Explanations of Phase Transitions in Highway Traffic. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 33, No. 5, 1999, pp. 365–379.
6. Ahn S., Cassidy M. J., and Laval J. A. Effects of Merging and Diverging on Freeway Traffic Oscillations. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
7. Rudjanakanoknad J. Capacity Change Mechanism of a Diverge Bottleneck. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2278, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 21–30.
8. Martinez M. P., Garcia A., and Moreno A. T. Traffic Microsimulation Study to Evaluate Freeway Exit Ramps Capacity. Proc., 6th International Symposium on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service, Stockholm. Sweden, 2011, pp. 139–150.
9. El-Basha R. H. S., Hassan Y., and Sayed T. A. Modeling Freeway Diverging Behavior on Deceleration Lanes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2012, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 30–37.
10. Lebacque J. P. The Godunov Scheme and What It Means for First Order Traffic Flow Models. Proc., 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Lyon, France, 1996, pp. 647–677.
11. Daganzo C. F. The Cell Transmission Model: Network Traffic. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1995, pp. 79–93.
12. Jin W. L., and Zhang H. M. An Instantaneous Kinematic Wave Theory of Diverging Traffic. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 48, 2013, pp. 1–16.
13. Schnetzler B., Louis X., and Lebacque J. P. A Multilane Junction Model. Transportmetrica, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2012, pp. 243–260.
14. Muñoz J. C., and Daganzo C. F. Moving Bottlenecks: A Theory Grounded on Experimental Observation. Proc., 15th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2002, pp. 441–462.
15. Laval J. A. Hybrid Models of Traffic Flow: Impacts of Bounded Vehicle Accelerations. PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, 2004.
16. Daganzo C. F., and Laval J. A. On Numerical Treatment of Moving Bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 39. No. 1, 2005, pp. 31–46.
17. Leclercq L. Bounded Acceleration Close to Fixed and Moving Bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2007, pp. 309–319.
18. Duret A., Bouffier J., and Buisson C. Onset of Congestion from Low-Speed Merging Maneuvers Within Free-Flow Traffic Stream: Analytical Solution. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2188, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 96–107.
19. Lighthill M. J., and Whitham G. B. On Kinematic Waves II. A Theory of Traffic Flow on Long Crowded Roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, Vol. 229, No. 1178, 1955, pp. 317–345.
20. Richards P. I. Shockwaves on the Highway. Operations Research, 1956, Vol. 4, pp. 42–51.
21. Laval J. A. Stochastic Processes of Moving Bottlenecks: Approximate Formulas for Highway Capacity. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1988, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 86–91.
22. Laval J. A. Effects of Geometric Design on Freeway Capacity: Impacts of Truck Lane Restrictions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2009, pp. 720–728.
23. Laval J. A., and Daganzo C. F. Lane-Changing in Traffic Streams. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2006, pp. 251–264.
24. Leclercq L., Laval J. A., and Chiabaut N. Capacity Drops at Merges: An Endogenous Model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 45, No. 9, 2011, pp. 1302–1313.
25. Newell G. F. A Simplified Car-Following Theory: A Lower Order Model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 36, No. 3. 2002, pp. 195–205.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Florian Marczak
Université de Lyon, F-69622, Lyon, France; IFSTTAR (French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Development, and Networks), Laboratoire d'Ingénierie Circulation Transports (LICIT), F-69675 Bron, France; and Ecole Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'Etat, LICIT, F-69518 Vaux en Velin, France.
Christine Buisson
Université de Lyon, F-69622, Lyon, France; IFSTTAR (French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Development, and Networks), Laboratoire d'Ingénierie Circulation Transports (LICIT), F-69675 Bron, France; and Ecole Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'Etat, LICIT, F-69518 Vaux en Velin, France.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 44

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 7

  1. Merging and diverging operations: benchmark of three European microsco...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. On lane assignment of connected automated vehicles: strategies to impr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Harnessing connected and automated vehicle technologies to control lan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Evaluating Designs of a Three-Lane Exit Ramp Based on the Entropy Meth...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Driving behaviour at motorway ramps and weaving segments based on empi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Capacity-drop at extended bottlenecks: Merge, diverge, and weave
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A Macroscopic Model for Freeway Weaving Sections
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub