Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Calibration, Estimation, and Sampling Issues of Car-Following Parameters

Abstract

Drivers behave in different ways, and these different behaviors are a cause of traffic disturbances. A key objective for simulation tools is to correctly reproduce this variability, in particular for car-following models. From data collection to the sampling of realistic behaviors, a chain of key issues must be addressed. This paper discusses data filtering, robustness of calibration, correlation between parameters, and sampling techniques of acceleration-time continuous car-following models. The robustness of calibration is systematically investigated with an objective function that allows confidence regions around the minimum to be obtained. Then, the correlation between sets of calibrated parameters and the validity of the joint distributions sampling techniques are discussed. This paper confirms the need for adapted calibration and sampling techniques to obtain realistic sets of car-following parameters, which can be used later for simulation purposes.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Lenz H., Wagner C. K., and Sollacher R. Multi-Anticipative Car-Following Model. European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1999, pp. 331–335.
2. Hoogendoorn S. P., Ossen S., and Schreuder M. Empirics of Multi-anticipative Car-Following Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1965, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 112–120.
3. Resting A., Treiber M., and Helbing D. Enhanced Intelligent Driver Model to Access the Impact of Driving Strategies on Traffic Capacity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, Vol. 368, 2010, pp. 4585–4605.
4. Jiang R., Wu Q., and Zhu Z. Full Velocity Difference Model for a Car-Following Theory. Physical Review E, Vol. 64, 2001.
5. Newell G. F. A Simplified Car-Following Theory: A Lower Order Model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2002, pp. 195–205.
6. Gipps P. G. A Behavioural Car-Following Model for Computer Simulation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1981, pp. 105–111, 1981.
7. Treiber M., and Resting A. Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation. Springer, New York, 2013.
8. Punzo V., Forminaso D. J., and Torrieri V. Nonstationary Kaiman Filter for Estimation of Accurate and Consistent Car-Following Data. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
9. Hamdar S. H., and Mahmassani H. S. Driver Car-Following Behavior: From Discrete Event Process to Continuous Set of Episodes. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
10. Punzo V., Borzacchiello M. T., and Ciuffo B. On the Assessment of Vehicle Trajectory Data Accuracy and Application to the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) Program Data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1243–1262.
11. Marczak E., and Buisson C. New Filtering Method for Trajectory Measurement Errors and Its Comparison with Existing Methods. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2315, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 35–46.
12. Kesting A., and Treiber M. Calibrating Car-Following Models Using Trajectory Data: Methodological Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2088, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 148–156.
13. Thiemann C., Treiber M., and Kesting A. Estimating Acceleration and Lane-Changing Dynamics from Next Generation Simulation Trajectory Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2088, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 90–101.
14. Punzo V., Ciuffo B., and Montanino M. Can Results of Car-Following Models Calibration Based on Trajectory Data Be Trusted? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2315, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 11–24.
15. Kim J., and Mahmassani H. S. Correlated Parameters in Driving Behavior Models: Car-Following Example and Implications for Traffic Microsimulation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2249, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 62–77.
16. Zhang L., and Kovvali V. G. Freeway Gap Acceptance Behaviors Based on Vehicle Trajectory Analysis. Presented at 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
17. Toledo T., and Zohar D. Modeling Duration of Lane Changes. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1999, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 71–78.
18. Leclerq L., Chiabaut N., Laval J. A., and Buisson C. Relaxation Phenomenon After Changing Lanes: Experimental Validation with NGSIM Data Set. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1999, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 79–85.
19. Methods and Tools for Supporting the Use, Calibration and Validation of Traffic Simulation Models (MULTITUDE). 2013. http://www.multitude-project.eu.
20. Hoogendoorn S. P., and Hoogendoorn R. Generic Calibration Framework for Joint Estimation of Car-Following Models by Using Microscopic Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2188, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 37–45.
21. Treiber M., and Kesting A. Microscopic Calibration and Validation of Car-Following Models: A Systematic Approach. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 80, 2013, pp. 922–939.
22. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J., 1986.
23. Landau I. D., and Zito G. Digital Control Systems. Springer, New York. 2006.
24. James F. Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics. 2nd ed. World Scientific, Singapore, 2007.
25. MINUIT. CERN Program Library, 1994. http://hep.fi.infn.it/minuit.pdf.
26. Montanino M., and Punzo V. Making NGSIM Data Usable for Studies on Traffic Flow Theory: Multistep Method for Vehicle Trajectory Reconstruction. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2390, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 99–111.
27. Kendall M., and Stuart A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Inference and Relationship, 4th ed. Macmillan, New York, 1979.
28. Hotelling H., and Richards Pabst M. Rank Correlation and Tests of Significance Involving No Assumption of Normality. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1936, pp. 29–43.
29. Schweizer B., and Wolff E. F. On Nonparametric Measures of Dependence for Random Variables. Annals of Statistics, Vol. 9. No. 4. 1981, pp. 879–885.
30. Govaert G. Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2010.
31. Duda R. O., Hart P. E., and Stork D. G. Pattern Classification. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2012.
32. Punzo V. Trajectory-Based and Aggregate Measures-Based Calibration of Traffic Simulation Models: A Cross-Comparison Exploratory Study. Proc., Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication International Conference, Riga, Latvia, 2013.
33. Nelsen R. B. An Introduction to Copulas. Springer, New York, 1999.
34. Monteil J., Billot R., Sau J., Armetta F., Hassas S., and El Faouzi N.-E. Cooperative Highway Traffic: Multiagent Modeling and Robustness Assessment to Local Perturbations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2391, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 1–10.
35. Wang M., Treiber M., Daamen W., Hoogendoorn S. P., and van Arem B. Modelling Supported Driving as an Optimal Control Cycle: Framework and Model Characteristics. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 80, 2012, pp. 491–511.
36. Monteil J., Billot R., Sau J., and El Faouzi N.-E. Linear and Weakly Non-Linear Stability Analyses of Cooperative Car-Following Models. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014.
37. Monteil J. Investigating the Effects of Cooperative Vehicles on Highway Traffic Flow Homogenization: Analytical and Simulation Studies. PhD thesis. Lyon University, Lyon, France, 2014.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Julien Monteil
Université de Lyon, F-69000, Lyon, France; IFSTTAR (French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Spatial Planning, Development, and Networks), Laboratoire d'Ingénierie Circulation Transports (LICIT), F-69500, Bron, France; and École National des Travaux Publics, LICIT, F-69518, Vaulx en Velin, France.
Romain Billot
Université de Lyon, F-69000, Lyon, France; IFSTTAR (French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Spatial Planning, Development, and Networks), Laboratoire d'Ingénierie Circulation Transports (LICIT), F-69500, Bron, France; and École National des Travaux Publics, LICIT, F-69518, Vaulx en Velin, France.
Smart Transport Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, D731 Ring Road, Kelvin Grove, Queensland 4059, Australia.
Jacques Sau
Université de Lyon, F-69000, Lyon, France; IFSTTAR (French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Spatial Planning, Development, and Networks), Laboratoire d'Ingénierie Circulation Transports (LICIT), F-69500, Bron, France; and École National des Travaux Publics, LICIT, F-69518, Vaulx en Velin, France.
Christine Buisson
Université de Lyon, F-69000, Lyon, France; IFSTTAR (French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Spatial Planning, Development, and Networks), Laboratoire d'Ingénierie Circulation Transports (LICIT), F-69500, Bron, France; and École National des Travaux Publics, LICIT, F-69518, Vaulx en Velin, France.
Nour-Eddin El Faouzi
Université de Lyon, F-69000, Lyon, France; IFSTTAR (French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Spatial Planning, Development, and Networks), Laboratoire d'Ingénierie Circulation Transports (LICIT), F-69500, Bron, France; and École National des Travaux Publics, LICIT, F-69518, Vaulx en Velin, France.
Smart Transport Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, D731 Ring Road, Kelvin Grove, Queensland 4059, Australia.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 91

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 28

  1. Bayesian Calibration of Simulation-Based Analysis of Transportation Sy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. An Algebraic Evaluation Framework for a Class of Car-Following Models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Bidirectional feedback of optimized gaussian mixture model and kernel ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Car-Following Model with Automatic Reaction Delay Estimation: An Atten...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Fuzzy Modeling and Inference for Physics-Aware Road Vehicle Driver Beh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. The Car-Following Model and Its Applications in the V2X Environment: A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Towards Data-Driven Vehicle Estimation for Signalised Intersections in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. An s-shaped three-parameter (S3) traffic stream model with consistent ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. High-Resolution Vehicle Trajectory Extraction and Denoising From Aeria...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Real-World Driving Features for Identifying Intelligent Driver Model P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. A Car-Following Data Collecting Method Based on Binocular Stereo Visio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Stage-specific impacts of hazy weather on car following
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Methods to Obtain Representative Car-Following Model Parameters from T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. $\mathcal{L}_2$ and $\mathcal{L}_{\infty}$ Stability Analysis of Het...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Is more always better? The impact of vehicular trajectory completeness...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. A copula-based estimation of distribution algorithm for calibration of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. A pattern recognition algorithm for assessing trajectory completeness
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Analyzing the Impact of Weigh-in-Motion (WIM)-based Overloading Enforc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. An Optimal Estimation Approach for the Calibration of the Car-Followin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Robust parameter estimation of car-following models considering practi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Adaptive PID feedback control for the longitudinal dynamics of driver-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Online calibration for microscopic traffic simulation and dynamic mult...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. How to assess the benefits of connected vehicles? A simulation framewo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. A cross-entropy method and probabilistic sensitivity analysis framewor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Measurement and Analysis of Heterogenous Vehicle Following Behavior on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Real Time Estimation of Drivers' Behaviour
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Notice of Removal: Parameter sampling strategies in traffic microsimul...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. An extension of MovSim for multi-agent cooperative vehicles modeling
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub