Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Methods for Quantitative Risk Analysis for Travel Demand Model Forecasts

Abstract

Travel demand forecasting models have played a critical role in transportation planning; these models support the evaluation of policies, programs, and projects that involve complex interactions between the activity system and the transportation system. Both the state of the art and the state of the practice in travel demand modeling have advanced considerably during the many decades since the original four-step model structure was conceived. However, the models are not now, and never will be, perfect representations of the systems they represent; so there are inevitably uncertainties about the forecasts that these models generate. Travel demand forecasts are important in many applications, for example, in determining whether a given alternative is financially or technically feasible or meets some benefit threshold. In these applications, uncertainties in model forecasts may translate directly into risks of not accomplishing the objectives related to the decision to implement or not implement the alternative. For projects that involve outside financing, this threshold varies greatly between equity and lender participants because of the differing risk–reward profiles. Several previous papers described the uncertainties associated with travel demand forecasting and recommended ways of improving the state of the practice. Among those recommendations is the application of formal quantitative risk analysis methods. This paper summarizes the existing literature and describes the application of one relatively straightforward but robust approach for conducting quantitative risk analysis with travel demand forecasting models. The formal risk analysis approach described here can assist by providing a more complete evaluation of a project's likelihood of achieving specified objectives. The approach can support the development of traffic and revenue forecasts beyond a most likely scenario to consider any level of risk assumed by a project sponsor, debt provider, or rating agency.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Manheim M. L. Fundamentals of Transportation Systems Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1979.
2. Pickrell D. H. A Desire Named Streetcar: Fantasy and Fact in Rail Transit Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 58, No. 2, 1992, pp. 158–176.
3. Flyvbjerg B., Holm M. K. S., and Buhl S. L. How (In)Accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects? The Case of Transportation. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 71, No. 2, 2005, pp. 131–146.
4. Bain R. Error and Optimism Bias in Toll Road Traffic Forecasts. Transportation, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2009.
5. Lemp J. D., and Kockelman K. M. Understanding and Accommodating Risk and Uncertainty in Toll Road Projects: A Review of the Literature. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2132, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 106–112.
6. Special Report 288: Metropolitan Travel Forecasting Current Practice and Future Direction. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009.
7. Salter R. G. A Probabilistic Forecasting Methodology Applied to Electric Energy Consumption. Report R-993-NSF. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., 1973.
8. Lewis D. The Future of Forecasting: Risk Analysis as a Philosophy of Transportation Planning. TRNews, No. 177, March–April, 1995, pp. 3–9.
9. Dalkey N., and Helmer O. An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Memorandum RM-727/1-Abridged. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., 1962.
10. Sevcikova H., Raftery A. E., and Waddell P. A. Assessing Uncertainty in Urban Simulations Using Bayesian Melding. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2007, pp. 652–669.
11. Toll Road Modeling Support: Final Report. HDR. Phoenix, Ariz., 2012.
12. Zhao Y., and Kockelman K. M. The Propagation of Uncertainty Through Travel Demand Models: An Exploratory Analysis. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2002, pp. 145–163.
13. Meyers R. H., Montgomery D. C., and Anderson-Cook C. M. Response Surface Methodology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J., 2009.
14. Technical Memorandum Planning-Level Traffic and Revenue Study Interstate 4 Tolled Managed Lanes. URS Corporation, Washington, D.C., 2012.
15. Special Report Number 9. Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Thomas Adler
RSG, 55 Railroad Row, White River Junction, VT 05001.
Michael Doherty
URS, 1625 Summit Lake Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32317.
Jack Klodzinski
Florida's Turnpike/URS, Florida's Turnpike Headquarters, P.O. Box 613069, Ocoee, FL 34761.
Raymond Tillman
RT Consultancy, 345 West 58th Street, New York, NY 10019.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 59

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Estimating the uncertainty of traffic forecasts from their historical ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Scenario Modeling of Autonomous Vehicles with Trip-Based Models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Travel modeling under emerging communications and mobility technologie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Quantified Probability Assessments of Revenue Forecasts
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub