Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Spatial Transferability of Tour-Based Time-of-Day Choice Models: Empirical Assessment

Abstract

An empirical assessment of the transferability of tour-based time-of-day (TOD) choice models across different counties in the San Francisco Bay Area of California is presented. Transferability was assessed with two approaches: (a) an application-based approach that tests the transferability of a model as a whole and (b) an estimation-based approach that allows the analyst to test which specific parameters in the model are transferable. Also tested was the hypothesis that pooling data from multiple geographic contexts helps in developing models with better transferability than those estimated from a single context. The estimation-based approach yielded encouraging results in favor of transferability of the TOD choice model, with a majority of parameter estimates in a pooled model found to be transferable. Pooling data from multiple geographic contexts appears to help in developing better transferable models with better transferability. However, attention is needed in selecting the geographic contexts from which to pool data. The pooled data should exhibit the same demographic characteristics and travel level-of-service conditions as in the application context.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Sikder S., Pinjari A. R., Srinivasan S., and Nowrouzian R. Spatial Transferability of Travel Forecasting Models: A Review and Synthesis. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 5, No. 2-3, 2013, pp. 104–128.
2. Sikder S., and Pinjari A. R. Spatial Transferability of Person-Level Daily Activity Generation and Time-Use Models: Empirical Assessment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2343, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 95–104.
3. Bowman J. L., Bradley M., and Castiglione J. Making Advanced Travel Forecasting Models Affordable Through Model Transferability. Final report. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2013.
4. Picado R. A Test of Transferability: The SE Florida Activity-Based Travel Demand Model. Presented at 14th National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Houston, Tex., 2013.
5. Jin X., and Horowitz A. J. Transferability of Time-of-Day Choice Modeling for Long-Distance Trips. In Transportation Statistics (Sloboda B. W., ed.), J. Ross Publishing, Inc., Plantation, Fla., 2009, pp. 249–261.
6. Vovsha P., and Bradley M. Hybrid Discrete Choice Departure-Time and Duration Model for Scheduling Travel Tours. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 46–56.
7. Abou Zeid M., Rossi T. F., and Gardner B. Modeling Time-of-Day Choice in Context of Tour- and Activity-Based Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1981, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 42–49.
8. Popuri Y., Ben-Akiva M. E., and Proussaloglou K. Time-of-Day Modeling in a Tour-Based Context: Tel-Aviv Experience. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2076, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 88–96.
9. Lemp J. D., and Kockelman K. M. Empirical Investigation of Continuous Logit for Departure Time Choice Using Bayesian Methods. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2165, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 59–68.
10. Ben-Akiva M., and Abou Zeid M. Methodological Issues in Modeling Time-of-Travel Preferences. Transportmetrica A, Vol. 9, No. 9, 2013, pp. 846–859.
11. Karasmaa N. Evaluation of Transfer Methods for Spatial Travel Demand Models. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2007, pp. 411–427.
12. Bradley M. A., and Daly A. J. Estimation of Logit Choice Models Using Mixed Stated Preference and Revealed Preference Information. In Understanding Travel Behavior in an Era of Change (Stopher P. R., and Lee-Gosselin M., eds.), Pergamon, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997, pp. 209–232.
13. Ou F.-L, and Yu J. C. Transferabilities of Urban Travel Demand Models. Journal of Transportation Engineering., Vol. 109, No. 4, 1983, pp. 579–595.
14. Badoe D. A., and Miller E. J. Modeling Mode Choice with Data from Two Independent Cross-Sectional Surveys: An Investigation. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1998, pp. 235–261.
15. Hood J. A Multilevel Analysis Framework for Developing Transferable Travel Demand Models. Presented at Innovations in Travel Modeling, Tampa, Fla., 2012.
16. Komma A., and Sivaramakrishnan S. Modeling Home-to-Work Commute-Timing Decisions of Workers with Flexible Work Schedules. Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
17. Koppelman F. S., Kuah G.-K., and Wilmot C. G. Transfer Model Updating with Disaggregate Data. In Transportation Research Record 1037, TRB National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 102–107.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sujan Sikder
Parsons Brinckerhoff, 400 Southwest Sixth Avenue, Suite 802, Portland, OR 97204.
Bertho Augustin
ENC 2503, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620.
Abdul Rawoof Pinjari
ENC 2503, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620.
Naveen Eluru
Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, Suite 483, 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6, Canada.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 47

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 13

  1. Finite-Mixture Continuous Logit Model: Formulation and Application for...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Examining the Effects of Local Sample Sizes on Spatial Transferability...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Testing and enhancing spatial transferability of artificial neural net...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Are Freight Production Models Transferable between Urban and Suburban ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Developing safety performance functions for freeways at different aggr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. An empirical assessment of the impact of incorporating attitudinal var...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Transferability of real-time safety performance functions for signaliz...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Modeling correlation and heterogeneity in crash rates by collision typ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Developing crash prediction models using parametric and nonparametric ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Transferring and calibrating safety performance functions among multip...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Investigating the Transferability of Calibrated Microsimulation Parame...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Exploring the transferability of safety performance functions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Transferability of calibrated microsimulation model parameters for saf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub