Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Modeling the Impact of Subject and Opponent Vehicles on Crash Severity in Two-Vehicle Collisions

Abstract

The main goal of this research was to develop models for crash severity prediction in a subject vehicle while taking into account the impact of both vehicles involved (Vehicles V1 and V2). Three binary targets were modeled: FatalSIK (to predict overall severity), FatalSIKV1 (to predict the probability of a serious injury, fatality, or both in Vehicle V1), and FatalSIKV2 (to predict the probability of a serious injury, fatality, or both in Vehicle V2). For the period from 2006 to 2010, 874 collisions involving injuries, fatalities, or both were analyzed. However, the crash sample included few severe events. Because imbalanced data introduce a bias toward the majority class (nonsevere crashes), in predictive modeling, they would result in less accurate predictions of the minority class (severe crashes). For the challenge imposed by small sample size and imbalanced data to be overcome, an important methodology was developed on the basis of a resampling strategy by using 10 stratified random samples for model evaluation. The effect of vehicle characteristics such as weight, engine size, wheelbase, and registration year (age of vehicle) were explored. Logistic regression analysis for FatalSIK suggested that the age of the vehicle and the type of collision were significant predictors (p < .0084 and .0346, respectively). Models FatalSIKV1 and FatalSIKV2 showed that the engine size of the opponent vehicle was statistically significant in predicting severity (p < .0762 and p < .03875, respectively). Models for FatalSIKV1 and FatalSIKV2 yielded satisfactory results when evaluated with the 10 stratified random samples: 61.2% [standard deviation (SD) = 2.4] and 61.4% (SD = 3.1), respectively.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety, 2011–2020, World Health Organization, 2010. http://www.who.int/roadsafety/decade_of_action/plan/plan_english.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2013.
2. Annual Statistical Report 2011. European Road Accident Database (CARE), 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/pdf/statistics/dacota/dacota-3.5-asr-2011.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2012.
3. Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2011: Car Occupants. European Road Observatory (ERO), 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/pdf/statistics/dacota/bfs2011_dacota-swov-car_occupants.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2012.
4. Hermans E., Brijs T., and Vanhoof K. Benchmarking Road Safety: Lessons to Learn from a Data Envelopment Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2009, pp. 174–182.
5. Road Deaths per Million Inhabitants, 2010. European Road Accident Database (CARE), 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/pdf/gis/mapcare_fatal_2010.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2013.
6. Annual Report. International Transport Forum, 2013. http://internationaltransportforum.org/irtadpublic/pdf/13IrtadReport.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2013.
7. Road Fatalities on the Basis of 30 days. Annual Report for the Year 2011. Portuguese National Authority for Road Safety (ANSR), 2011. http://www.ansr.pt/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=oGPXlMCuLtc%3d&tabid=344&mid=1214&language=pt-PT. Accessed July 28, 2013.
8. Evans L. Driver Injury and Fatality Risk in Two-Car Crashes Versus Mass Ratio Inferred Using Newtonian Mechanics. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 26, No. 5, 1994, pp. 609–616.
9. Wood D., and Simms C. Safety and the Car Size Effect: A Fundamental Explanation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1997, pp. 139–151.
10. Wenzel T., and Ross M. The Effects of Vehicle Model and Driver Behavior on Risk. Journal of Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2005, pp. 479–494.
11. Al-Ghamdi A. Using Logistic Regression to Estimate the Influence of Accident Factors on Accident Severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2002, pp. 729–741.
12. Kockelman K., and Kweon Y. Driver Injury Severity: An Application of Ordered Prohibit Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 34, 2002, pp. 313–321.
13. Savolainen P. T., Mannering F. L., Lord D., and Quddus M. A. The Statistical Analysis of Highway Crash-Injury Severities: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Alternatives. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1666–1676.
14. Kononen D., Flannagan C., and Wang S. Identification and Validation of a Regression Model for Predicting Serious Injuries Associated with Motor Vehicle Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2011, pp. 112–122.
15. Broughton J. Car Driver Casualty Rates in Great Britain by Type of Car. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2008, pp. 1543–1552.
16. Broughton J. The Influence of Car Registration Year on Driver Casualty Rates in Great Britain. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 45, 2012, pp. 438–445.
17. Xie Y. C., Zhao K. G., and Huynh N. Analysis of Driver Injury Severity in Rural Single-Vehicle Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 47, 2012, pp. 36–44.
18. Mendez A., Izquierdo F., and Ramirez B. Evolution of the Crashworthiness and Aggressively of the Spanish Car Fleet. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1621–1631.
19. Boufous S., Finch C., Hayen A., and Williamson A. The Impact of Environmental, Vehicle, and Driver Characteristics on Injury Severity in Older Drivers Hospitalized as a Result of a Traffic Crash. Journal of Safety Research., Vol. 39, No. 1, 2008, pp. 65–72.
20. Fredette M., Mambu L. S., Chouinard A., and Bellavance F. Safety Impacts Due to the Incompatibility of SUVs, Minivans, and Pickup Trucks in Two-Vehicle Collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1987–1995.
21. Tolouei R., and Titheridge H. Vehicle Mass as a Determinant of Fuel Consumption and Secondary Safety Performance. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2009, pp. 385–399.
22. Tolouei R., Maher M., and Titheridge H. Vehicle Mass and Injury Risk in Two-Car Crashes: A Novel Methodology. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 155–166.
23. Chen T. D., and Kockelman K. M. Roles of Vehicle Footprint, Height, and Weight in Crash Outcomes: Application of a Heteroscedastic Ordered Probit Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2280, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 89–99.
24. Martin J., and Lenguerrand E. A Population Based Estimation of the Driver Protection Provided by Passenger Cars: France 1996–2005. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1811–1821.
25. Huang H., Siddiqui C., and Abdel-Aty M. Indexing Crash Worthiness and Crash Aggressivity by Vehicle Type. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2011, pp. 1364–1370.
26. Crone S., and Finlay S. Instance Sampling in Credit Scoring: An Empirical Study of Sample Size and Balancing. International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 28, 2012, pp. 224–238.
27. Kotsiantis S., Kanellopoulos K., and Pintelas P. Handling Imbalanced Datasets: A Review. GESTS International Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2006, pp. 25–36.
28. Joshi M. V., Kumar V., and Agarwal R. C. Evaluating Boosting Algorithms to Classify Rare Cases: Comparison and Improvements. Presented at 1st IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, San Jose, Calif., 2001.
29. King G., and Zeng L. Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data. Political Analysis, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2001, pp. 137–163.
30. Japkowicz N., and Stephen S. The Class Imbalance Problem: A Systematic Study. Journal of Intelligent Data Analysis, Vol. 6, No. 5, 2002, pp. 429–449.
31. Cramer J. S. Predictive Performance of the Binary Logit Model in Unbalanced Samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), Vol. 48, No. 1, 1999, pp. 85–94.
32. He H., and Garcia E. A. Learning from Imbalanced Data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 9, 2009, pp. 1263–1284.
33. Nisbet R., Elder J., and Miner G. Handbook of Statistical Analysis and Data Mining Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam Netherlands, 2009.
34. Refaat M. Data Preparation for Data Mining Using SAS. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, Calif., 2007.
35. Sarma K. Predictive Modeling with SAS Enterprise Miner: Practical Solutions for Business Applications. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C., 2007.
36. Applied Analytics Using SAS Enterprise Miner 5. Instructor-based training. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C., 2007.
37. Chawla N. V. C4.5 and Imbalanced Datasets: Investigating the Effect of Sampling Method, Probabilistic Estimate, and Decision Tree Structure. Presented at International Conference on Machine Learning, Workshop on Class Imbalances, Washington, D.C., 2003.
38. Statistics I: Introduction to Anova, Regression, and Logistic Regression. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C., 2009.
39. Wooldridge J. M. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 3rd ed. Thomson South-Western, Mason, Ohio, 2006.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Guilhermina A. Torrão
Center for Mechanical Technology and Automation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Margarida C. Coelho
Center for Mechanical Technology and Automation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Nagui M. Rouphail
North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Campus Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 29

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 8

  1. Speed related variables for crash injury risk analysis: what has been ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Modeling the risk of wrong-way driving at the exit ramp terminals of p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A systematic assessment of the use of opponent variables, data subsett...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A Rare Event Modelling Approach to Assess Injury Severity Risk of Vuln...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Modeling the Risk of Wrong-Way Driving Entry at the Exit Ramp Terminal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Statistical Analysis of the Occurrence and Severity of Crashes Involvi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Comprehensive Analysis of Wrong-Way Driving Crashes on Alabama Interst...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Analysis of injury severity of drivers involved in single- and two-veh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub