Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Crossover Roundabouts: An Alternative Interchange Design

Abstract

The double crossover diamond (DCD) (also known as the diverging diamond interchange) was first introduced conceptually to engineers and planners in the United States less than a decade ago. The concept has been spreading rapidly since that time; as of July 2013, DCDs had been constructed in 19 locations in eight states and had been studied in countless other projects nationwide. Nearby frontage roads pose operational challenges for all interchanges, and DCD geometry intensifies this problem. Reverse curvature for crossover points reduces the storage length between ramps and nearby frontage roads in DCDs. The crossover roundabout concept was conceived as a potential solution to this challenge. Instead of a signalized crossover point (as in a DCD), a five-legged roundabout was proposed for the intersecting arterial, frontage road, and ramps. A crossover roundabout would function essentially like any other roundabout except that it would adjoin an arterial roadway with travel directions flipped on one side. The operational and safety benefits of typical roundabouts are expected to apply to crossover roundabouts; no new driver behaviors must be learned. Variations of crossover roundabout interchanges are possible: one crossover roundabout could adjoin half of a DCD, or two crossover roundabouts could form a complete interchange. Interchanges with two crossover roundabouts would look like typical double-roundabout diamond interchanges with the arterial road directions flipped between the roundabouts. Crossover roundabouts are not required to contain frontage roads to function. Microsimulation and cost estimations have shown the concept to have merit; crossover roundabouts can combine the best attributes of DCDs and roundabouts.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Chlewicki G. New Interchange and Intersection Designs: The Synchronized Split-Phasing Intersection and the Diverging Diamond Interchange. In 2nd Urban Street Symposium: Uptown, Downtown, or Small Town: Designing Urban Streets That Work (CD-ROM). Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003.
2. Bared J. G., Edara P. K., and Jagannathan R. Design and Operational Performance of Double Crossover Intersection and Diverging Diamond Interchange. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1912, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 31–38.
3. Bared J. G. Drivers’ Evaluation of the Diverging Diamond Interchange. FHWA-HRT-07-048. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.
4. Sharma S., and Chatterjee I. Performance Evaluation of the Diverging Diamond Interchange in Comparison with the Conventional Diamond Interchange. Presented at Transportation Scholars Conference, Iowa State University, Ames, 2007.
5. Afshar A. M., Bared J. G., Wolf S., and Edara P. K. Traffic Operational Comparison of Single-Point and Diverging Diamond Interchanges. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
6. Diverging Diamond Interchange: Results from the Right Transportation Solution Survey. Organizational Results Division, Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, Jan. 2010. http://library.modot.mo.gov/RDT/reports/TRyy1013/orb10005.pdf.
7. Diverging Diamond Interchanges. In MoDOT Engineering Policy Guide. Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, Jan. 4, 2013. http://epg.modot.mo.gov/index.php?title=234.6_Diverging_Diamond_Interchanges. Accessed June 24, 2013.
8. Chlewicki G. Should the Diverging Diamond Interchange Always Be Considered as a Diamond Interchange Form? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2223, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 88–95.
9. Rodegerdts L., Bansen J., Tiesler C., Knudsen J., Meyers E., Johnson M., Moule M., Persaud B., Lyon C., Hallmark S., Isebrands H., Crown R. B., Guichet B., and O'Brien A. NCHRP Report 672: Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, 2nd ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ryan Hale
Missouri Department of Transportation, 600 Northeast Colbern Road, Lee's Summit, MO 64086.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 93

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Comparing the efficiency of the super diverging diamond interchange to...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Safety Performance Evaluation of the New Mega Elliptical Roundabout In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Travel Time Evaluation of Synchronized and Milwaukee B as New Intercha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub