Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Design Guidelines and Conditions that Warrant Deployment of Fully Actuated Coordination

Abstract

Most signal timing design documents focus on critical parameters such as cycle, offset, and splits but provide little guidance on other coordination parameters. The choice of settings for those parameters consequently is based on opinion more often than on quantitative results. The force-off mode (fixed or floating) and the use of fully actuated coordination (or early yield) are two such parameters. In this study, software-in-the-loop simulation was carried out to evaluate the impact of these two design parameters on coordinated system performance. Four alternative volume scenarios were simulated to explore a variety of conditions based on varying demand for the main street and side street movements. When side street volume approaches capacity, operational benefits arise for the associated phases, particularly when main street volumes are below capacity. Some modest improvements in individual movement average delays are observed even when the main street volumes are also near capacity. Fixed force-off and fully actuated coordination reduce the delay of noncoordinated phases. Coordinated phase delay and arterial travel times are not affected. The recommendation is made for coordinated intersection designs to feature detection on all phases and to be configured for fixed force-offs and fully actuated coordination.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Brennan T. M. Jr., Griggs B. D., Grimmer G. M., Hainen A. M., Day C. M., Sturdevant J. R., and Bullock D. M. Defining Design Space for Parameters of Traffic Signal Timing: Empirical Approach. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2311, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 85–98.
2. de Castro-Neto M. M., Urbanik T. II, and Han L. D. Noncoordinated Phases in Coordinated Traffic Signal System: Evaluation of Alternative Permissive Periods on Performance. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1978, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 8–15.
3. Yarger B. W. Fully Actuated Versus Semi-Actuated Traffic Signal Systems. Presented at Annual Meeting of ITE, 1993. http://www.yargerengineering.com/fully_vs_semi-actuated.pdf.
4. Day C. M., Smaglik E. J., Bullock D. M., and Sturdevant J. R. Quantitative Evaluation of Fully Actuated Versus Nonactuated Coordinated Phases. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2080, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 8–21.
5. Sunkari S. R., Engelbrecht R. J., and Balke K. N. Evaluation of Advance Coordination Features in Traffic Signal Controllers. Report FHWA/TX-05/0-4657-1. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Sept. 2004.
6. Lee J., and Park B. Evaluation of Phase Force-Off Modes in Coordinated-Actuated Signal Operations. ITE Journal, Vol. 32, 2011, pp. 32–37.
7. Urbanik T., Kyte M., and Bullock D. Software-in-the-Loop Simulation of Traffic Signal Systems. SimSub midyear newsletter, 2006, pp. 15–19.
8. Stevanovic A., Abdel-Rahim A., Zlatkovic M., and Amin E. Microscopic Modeling of Traffic Signal Operations: Comparative Evaluation of Hardware-in-the-Loop and Software-in-the-Loop Simulations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2128, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 143–151.
9. Day C. M., Ernst J. M., Brennan T. M. Jr., Chou C.-S., Hainen A. M., Remias S. M., Nichols A., Griggs B. D., and Bullock D. M. Performance Measures for Adaptive Signal Control: Case Study of System-in-the-Loop Simulation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2311, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 1–15.
10. Smaglik E. J., Bullock D. M., and Urbanik T. II Evaluation of Lane-by-Lane Vehicle Detection for Actuated Controllers Serving Multilane Approaches. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1925, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 123–133.
11. Day C. M., Brennan T. M., Sturdevant J. R., and Bullock D. M. Performance Evaluation of Traffic Sensing and Control Devices. Publication FHWA/IN/JTRP-2011/17. Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, West Lafayette, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christopher M. Day
Purdue University, 400 Centennial Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2051.
Darcy M. Bullock
Purdue University, 400 Centennial Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2051.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 45

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 9

  1. Traffic Signal Systems Solutions Toolbox: A Case Study from Pennsylvan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Time-Series fuel consumption prediction assessing delay impacts on ene...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Leveraging Fully Actuated Signal Coordination and Phase Reservice to F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Traffic-Responsive Control Technique for Fully-Actuated Coordinated Si...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Assessing the impact of traffic signal performance on crash frequency ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Leveraging Sensor-Based Vehicle Position and Speed Information in Traf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Evaluation of Multiple Hardware and Software in the Loop Signal Contro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Managing User Delay with a Focus on Pedestrian Operations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Use of Maximum Vehicle Delay to Characterize Signalized Intersection P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub