Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Assessment of Capacity Charges for Shared-Use Rail Lines

Abstract

North American freight rail demand is projected to increase, and new passenger services are being proposed to operate simultaneously over portions of the freight infrastructure. Capacity allocation and corresponding charges have become important issues in shared-use rail lines. This study developed new approaches suitable for North American shared-use corridors with capacity models and base train equivalent concepts to estimate the possible capacity charges in congestion cost and opportunity cost. The possible access charging schemes were also assessed and compared with the current regime (infrastructure cost only). The evaluation of capacity charges demonstrates that owning railroads may bear significant congestion or opportunity cost, or both, resulting from the addition of passenger services. Opportunity cost, which represents the profit loss caused by lack of capacity and is paid by the owning railroad, is higher than the congestion cost. Therefore, capacity charges should be considered in the negotiation process between freight railroads and passenger operators. The proposed approaches facilitate the estimation of capacity charges from additional passenger trains with rational and quantitative methods. The charging schemes can assist railroads and operators in achieving a mutually satisfactory agreement.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Amtrak Reform Council. A Summary of Current Legislative Provisions Prescribing the Legal and Regulatory Framework Governing the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Amtrak Reform Council, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2000.
2. Amtrak Access Fees. Office of Inspector General, U.S. Departm ent of Tran sportation, 2009. http://www.oig.dot.gov/sites/dot/files/AMTRAK%20Access%20Fees%20(Final%20redacted3).pdf. Accessed July 31, 2013.
3. Nash C. Rail Infrastructure Charges in Europe. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 39, Part 3, 2005, pp. 259–278.
4. Sánchez-Borràs M., Nash C., Abrantes P., and Lopez-Pita A. Rail Access Charges and the Competitiveness of High Speed Trains. Transport Policy, Vol. 17, 2010, pp. 102–109.
5. Nash C., Coulthard S., and Matthews B. Rail Track Charges in Great Britain—The Issue of Charging for Capacity. Transport Policy, Vol. 11, 2004, pp. 315–327.
6. Harrod S. Auction Pricing of Network Access for North American Railways. Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 49, 2013, pp. 176–189.
7. Johnson D., and Nash C. Charging for Scarce Rail Capacity in Britain: A Case Study. Review of Network Economics, Vol. 7, Issue 1, 2008, pp. 1–24.
8. Gibson S. Allocation of Capacity in the Rail Industry. Utilities Policy, Vol. 11, 2003, pp. 39–42.
9. Dingler M. H., Lai Y. -C., and Barkan C. P. L. Impact of Train Type Heterogeneity on Single-Track Railway Capacity. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2117, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 41–49.
10. Dingler M. H., Lai Y.-C., and Barkan C. P. L. Mitigating Train Type Heterogeneity on a Single Track Line. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 227, No. 2, 2013, pp. 140–147.
11. Lai Y.-C., Dingler M. H., Hsu C.-E., and Chiang P.-C. Optimizing Train Network Routing with Heterogeneous Traffic. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2159, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 69–76.
12. Dingler M. H., Lai Y.-C., and Barkan C. P. L. Effect of Train Type Heterogeneity on Single-Track Heavy Haul Railway Line Capacity. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Aug. 2013. http://pif.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/07/30/0954409713496762.
13. Krueger H. Parametric Modeling in Rail Capacity Planning. In 1999 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings: Simulation—A Bridge to the Future, Phoenix, Ariz., 1999, Vol. 2, pp. 1194–1200.
14. Lai Y.-C., and Barkan C. P. L. Enhanced Parametric Railway Capacity Evaluation Tool. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2117, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 33–40.
15. Lai Y.-C., and Barkan C. P. L. Comprehensive Decision Support Framework for Strategic Railway Capacity Planning. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 137, No. 10, 2011, pp. 738–749.
16. Dingler M. H., Preston J. M., Barkan C. P. L., and Sameni M. K. Profit-Generating Capacity for a Freight Railroad. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
17. Lai Y.-C., Liu Y.-H., and Lin T.-Y. Development of Base Train Equivalents to Standardize Trains for Capacity Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2289, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 119–125.
18. Lai Y.-C., Dingler M. H., Lin S. Y., and Liu K. C. Optimal Track Class Assignment for a Railroad Network. Journal of Operations Research Society, Vol. 64, No. 12, 2013, pp. 1800–1809.
19. Dingler M. H. The Impact of Operational Strategies and New Technologies on Railroad Capacity. Master's thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yung-Cheng (Rex) Lai
Railway Technology Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Civil Engineering Building, Room 313, No. 1, Roosevelt Road, Sec. 4, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Yi-Ju Lin
Railway Technology Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Civil Engineering Building, Room 313, No. 1, Roosevelt Road, Sec. 4, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Yu-Fang Cheng
Railway Technology Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Civil Engineering Building, Room 313, No. 1, Roosevelt Road, Sec. 4, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 18

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. Integrated Passenger and Freight Train Planning on Shared-Use Corridor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Using Profit-Maximizing Capacity Framework and Models for Railway Capa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Routing Trains with Consideration of Congestion-Induced Link and Node ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub