Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Willingness-to-Pay Method to Estimate Effect of Accessibility on Property Prices

Abstract

The economic evaluation and the financing of transportation projects require comprehensive estimation and determination of all transportation-related external costs. The effect of accessibility on property values and the hedonic price of environmental attributes related to the transportation system are among the most important external effects. In this study, the willingness to pay (WTP) for improved accessibility and environmental quality was determined by the use of a stated preference (SP) technique. With SP data collected in Tehran, Iran, a multinomial logit model was developed, and WTP was estimated with this model. Because the WTP for environmental attributes was estimated with qualitative measures, a fuzzy transformation was used to estimate the WTP for a unit increase in environmental quality.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. van Wee B. Transport and Ethics: Ethics and the Evaluation of Transport Policies and Projects, 1st ed. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, Mass. 2011.
2. Riley D. Taken for a Ride. The Center for Land Policy Studies, London, 2001.
3. Land Value and Public Transport Stage 1—Summary of Findings. Policy Unit, Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, London 2002.
4. Debrezion G., Pels E., and Rietveld P. The Impact of Railway Stations on Residential and Commercial Property Value: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 35, 2007, pp. 161–180.
5. Smith J., and Gihring T. Financing Transit Systems Through Value Capture: An Annotated Bibliography. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2006, pp. 751–786.
6. Smith J., Gihring T., and Litman T. Financing Transit Systems Through Value Capture: An Annotated Bibliography. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, British Columbia, Canada, 2009.
7. Salon D., and Shewmake S. Opportunities for Value Capture to Fund Public Transport: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature with Examples from East Asia. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
8. Nelson A. C. Effects of Elevated Heavy-Rail Transit Stations on House Prices with Respect to Neighborhood Income. In Transportation Research Record 1359, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 127–132.
9. Cervero R., and Duncan M. Transit's Value-Added Effects: Light and Commuter Rail Services on Commercial Land Values. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 8–15.
10. Gatzlaff D. H., and Smith M. T. The Impact of the Miami Metrorail on the Value of Residences near Station Locations. Land Economics, Vol. 69, 1993, pp. 54–66.
11. Adair A., McGreal S., Smyth A., Cooper J., and Ryley T. House Prices and Accessibility: The Testing of Relationships Within the Belfast Urban Area. Housing Studies, Vol. 15, 2000, pp. 699–716.
12. Forrest D., and Glen J. The Impact of a Light Rail System on the Structure of House Prices. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 30, 1995, pp. 15–29.
13. Weinberger R. R. Light Rail Proximity: Benefit or Detriment in the Case of Santa Clara County, California? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1747, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 104–113.
14. Rodriguez D., and Targa F. Value of Accessibility to Bogota's Bus Rapid Transit System. Transport Reviews, Vol. 24, 2001, pp. 586–610.
15. Munoz-Raskin R. Walking Accessibility to Bus Rapid Transit: Does It Affect Property Values? The Case of Bogota, Colombia. Transport Policy, Vol. 17, 2009, pp. 72–84.
16. Cervero R., and Duncan M. Land Value Impacts of Rail Transit Services in Los Angeles County. National Association of Realtors and Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., 2002.
17. Des Rosiers F., Theriault M., Voisin M., and Dube J. Does an Improved Urban Bus Service Affect House Values? International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 4, 2010, pp. 321–346.
18. Armstrong R. J. Jr. Impacts of Commuter Rail Service as Reflected in Single-Family Residential Property Values. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 88–98.
19. Weinstein B. L., and Clower T. L. An Assessment of the Dart LRT on Taxable Property Valuations and Transit Oriented Development. Center for Economic Development and Research, University of North Texas, Denton, 2002.
20. ATIS Real Weatheralls. The Effect Public Transport Provision Has on Land Value. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, University College London, and Symonds Group Land Value and Public Transport, London, 2002.
21. Henneberry J. Transport Investment and House Prices. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, Vol. 1692, 1998, pp. 144–158.
22. Landis J., Guhathakurta S., and Zhang M. Capitalization of Transit Investments into Single-Family Home Prices. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, Calif., 1994.
23. Bollinger C. R., Ihlanfeldt K. R., and Bowes D. R. Spatial Variation in Office Rents Within the Atlanta Region. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, 1998, pp. 1097–1118.
24. Chen H., Rufolo A., and Dueker K. J. Measuring the Impact of Light Rail Systems on Single Family Home Values: A Hedonic Approach with GIS Application. Centre for Urban Studies, College of Urban and Public Affairs, Portland State University, Portland, Ore., 1997.
25. Du H., and Mulley C. Understanding Spatial Variations in the Impact of Accessibility on Land Value Using Geographically Weighted Regression. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 5, 2012, pp. 46–59.
26. Du H., and Mulley C. Relationship Between Transport Accessibility and Land Value: Local Model Approach with Geographically Weighted Regression. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1977, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 197–205.
27. Cortright J. Walking the Walk: How Walkability Raises Home Values in U.S. Cities. CEOs for Cities, Cleveland, Ohio, 2009. www.ceosforcities.org/files/WalkingTheWalk_CEOsforCities1.pdf.
28. Pivo G., and Fisher J. D. The Walkability Premium in Commercial Real Estate Investments. Real Estate Economics, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2011, pp. 185–219.
29. Debrezion G., Pels E., and Rietveld P. The Impact of Rail Transport on Real Estate Prices: An Empirical Analysis of the Dutch Housing Market. Discussion paper. Department of Spatial Economics, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2006.
30. Cervero R., and Kang C. D. Bus Rapid Transit Impacts on Land Uses and Land Values in Seoul, Korea. Transport Policy, Vol. 18, 2011, pp. 102–116.
31. Shiftan Y., and Suhrbier J. The Effect of Land Use Policies on Regional Travel Using a Residential Choice Stated-Preference Model and an Activity Based Travel Model. Presented at 9th Meeting of the International Association for Travel Behaviour Research, Gold Coast, Australia, 2000.
32. Levine J., and Frank L. D. Transportation and Land-Use Preferences and Residents’ Neighborhood Choices: The Sufficiency of Compact Development in the Atlanta Region. Transportation, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2007, pp. 255–274.
33. Gayda S. Stated Preference Survey on Residential Location Choice in Brussels. Proc., 8th World Conference on Transport Research, Antwerp, Belgium, 1998.
34. Hunt J. D., McMillan J. D. P., and Abraham J. E. Stated Preference Investigation of Influences on Attractiveness of Residential Locations. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 79–87.
35. Hensher D. A., Rose J. M., and Greene W. H. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2005.
36. Rose J. M., and Bliemer M. C. J. Sample Size Requirements for Stated Choice Experiments. Transportation, Vol. 40, Feb. 2013, pp. 1021–1041.
37. Bierlaire M. BIOGEME: A Free Package for the Estimation of Discrete Choice Models. Proc., 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, 2003.
38. Cervero R., and Landis J. Assessing the Impacts of Urban Rail Transit on Local Real Estate Markets Using Quasi-Experimental Comparisons. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 27, 1993, pp. 13–22.
39. Palmquist R. B. Impact of Highway Improvements on Property Values in Washington State. In Transportation Research Record 887, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 22–29.
40. Deng T., and Nelson J. D. The Impact of Bus Rapid Transit on Land Development: A Case Study of Beijing, China. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 6, 2010, p. 1196.
41. Mendieta J. C., and Perdomo J. A. Especificacíon y Estimacíon de un Modelo de Precios Hedónico Espacial para Evaluar el Imapcto de Transmilenio sobre el Valor de la Propriedad en Bogotá. CEDE, Bogotá, Colombia, 2007.
42. Rodriguez D. A., and Mojica C. H. Land Value Impacts of Bus: The Case of Bogotá's Transmilenio, Land Lines. Lincoln Institue of Land Policy, Cambridge, Mass., 2008.
43. Nelson J. P. Highway Noise and Property Value: A Survey of Recent Evidence. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1982, pp. 117–138.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Navid Kalantari
Sharan Transportation Research Center, No. 1(8), Sahand Alley, Hengam Avenue, Resalat Square, Tehran, Iran.
S. Jusseph Ssadjedi
Sharan Transportation Research Center, No. 1(8), Sahand Alley, Hengam Avenue, Resalat Square, Tehran, Iran.
Ramin Khavarzadeh
Sharan Transportation Research Center, No. 1(8), Sahand Alley, Hengam Avenue, Resalat Square, Tehran, Iran.
Abolfazl (Kouros) Mohammadian
2087 Engineering Research Facility, Department of Civil and Materials Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, M/C 246, 842 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60607-7023.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 46

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub