Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Simple Design Procedure for New Flexible Pavement Structures Based on Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide

Abstract

This study developed a set of design tables to be used by the New York State Department of Transportation (DOT) to design new flexible pavement structures. To use the tables, the designer selects the design life of the pavement (10 or 15 years), the type of subgrade soil, and the average daily truck traffic volume in the design lane in the first year. The design tables were built for each of the 11 regions of the New York State DOT by assembling the design solutions obtained by running the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide software starting from typical design scenarios. The scenarios followed the design solutions given in the Comprehensive Pavement Design Manual (CPDM) currently used by the New York State DOT. The work included the analysis of New York State DOT traffic data, the compilation of a database of material characterization data for the pavement materials used in New York State, and the regional calibration of distress models used in the design guide for new flexible pavements. The comparison of the newly created design tables with those given in the CPDM shows that the new design solutions are more sensitive to traffic volume than are the design solutions provided in the CPDM. For low traffic volume–-annual average daily truck traffic (AADTT) < 500 vehicles per day–-the recommended total thickness for the hot-mix asphalt (HMA) layers is less in the new design table than in the CPDM, whereas for medium and high traffic volume (AADTT > 500), the recommended total thickness for the HMA layers is slightly higher in the new design tables than in the CPDM.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. ARA, Inc., ERES Consultants Division. Guide for Mechanistic–Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. Final Report, NCHRP Project 1–37A. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004. www.trb.org/mepdg/guide.htm. Accessed July 2013.
2. Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide, Interim Edition: A Manual of Practice. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2008.
3. Comprehensive Pavement Design Manual. New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, June 2000. https://www.dot.ny.gov/portal/page/portal/divisions/engineering/design/dqab/cpdm?nd=nysdot. Accessed July 2013.
4. NCHRP Report 538: Traffic Data Collection, Analysis, and Forecasting for Mechanistic Pavement Design. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005.
5. Papagiannakis A. T., Bracher M., and Jackson N. C. Utilizing Clustering Techniques in Estimating Traffic Data Input for Pavement Design. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 11, Nov. 2006, pp. 872–879.
6. Romanoschi S. A., Intaj F., and Bendana L. J. Identification of Patterns for Traffic Inputs to Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide in New York State. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.
7. Intaj F. Development of Traffic Inputs for the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide in New York State. MS thesis. University of Texas at Arlington, 2012.
8. Long-Term Pavement Performance Information Management System: Pavement Performance Database User Reference Guide. Publication FHWA-RD-03-088 (interim update). Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, Nov. 2008.
9. Momin S. Local Calibration of the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide for North Eastern United States. MS thesis. University of Texas at Arlington, 2011.
10. Mallela J., Titus-Glover L., Darter M. I., Von Quintus H., Gotlif A., Stanley M., and Sadasivam S. Guidelines for Implementing NCHRP 1–37A M-E Design Procedures in Ohio: Volume 1—Summary of Findings, Implementation Plan, and Next Steps. Applied Research Associates, Inc., Champaign, Ill., Nov. 2009.
11. Titus-Glover L., and Mallela J. Guidelines for Implementing NCHRP 1–37A M-E Design Procedures in Ohio: Volume 4—MEPDG Models Validation and Recalibration. Applied Research Associated, Inc., Champaign, Ill., Nov. 2009.
12. Li J., Pierce L. M., and Uhlmeyer J. Calibration of Flexible Pavement in Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide for Washington State. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2095, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 73–83.
13. Darter M. I., Titus-Glover L., and Von Quintus H. L. Implementation of the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide in Utah: Validation, Calibration, and Development of the UDOT MEPDG User's Guide. Research Division, Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City, Sept. 2010.
14. Muthadi N. R. Local Calibration of the MEPDG for Flexible Pavement Design. MS thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 2007.
15. Romanoschi S. A., Onyango M., and Gedafa D. Verification of Mechanistic-Empirical Design Models for Flexible Pavements through APT Testing (CISL Experiment No. 14). Final report. Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka, 2011.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ali Abdullah
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, 416 Yates Street, Suite 425, Arlington, TX 76019.
Stefan A. Romanoschi
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, 416 Yates Street, Suite 425, Arlington, TX 76019.
Luis J. Bendana
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, 416 Yates Street, Suite 425, Arlington, TX 76019.
Tito Nyamuhokya
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, 416 Yates Street, Suite 425, Arlington, TX 76019.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 53

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Reasonable thickness design of expressway pavement structures based on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub