Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Accessibility of Low-Income Populations to Safe Zones during Localized Evacuations

Abstract

Access to transportation is of utmost importance for an evacuation, especially to the disadvantaged population. This study presents a simple yet revealing and practical tool for measuring the level of accessibility to so-called safe zones. Usually accessibility is reported on the basis of time, cost, or distance and does not account for the many other variables that influence travel behavior. This research bypassed those limitations by using results from the Maryland Statewide Transportation Model to take advantage of the log-sum measure. Flood and storm surge estimates, shelter and hospital locations, demographics, and other data were collected from official sources. Two locations in the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments region were analyzed: the city of Frederick, Maryland, and the Anacostia neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Results suggest a positive correlation between income and accessibility. However, the results also reveal that factors such as location and vehicle ownership could greatly affect accessibility.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Godschalk D. R. Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2003, pp. 136–143.
2. Chakraborty J., Tobin G., and Montz B. Population Evacuation: Assessing Spatial Variability in Geophysical Risk and Social Vulnerability to Natural Hazards. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2005, pp. 23–33.
3. Dash N., and Gladwin H. Evacuation Decision Making and Behavioral Responses: Individual and Household. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2007, pp. 69–77.
4. Murray-Tuite P., and Mahmassani H. Model of Household Trip-Chain Sequencing in Emergency Evacuation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 21–29.
5. Sohail M. Sustaining Livelihoods by Improving Urban Public Transport. Proc., ICE—Engineering Sustainability, Vol. 158, No. 1, 2005, pp. 9–15.
6. Disaster Response and Recovery Resource for Transit Agencies. Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
7. Abley S. Measuring Accessibility and Providing Transport Choice. Presented at National Conference of the Australian Institute of Traffic Planning and Management (AITPM), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 2010.
8. Apparicio P., Abdelmajid M., Riva M., and Shearmur R. Comparing Alternative Approaches to Measuring the Geographical Accessibility of Urban Health Services: Distance Types and Aggregation-Error Issues. International Journal of Health Geographics, Vol. 7, No. 7, 2008.
9. Tomer A., Kneebone E., Puentes P., and Berube A. Missed Opportunity: Transit and Jobs in Metropolitan America. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 2011.
10. Yigitcanlar T., Sipe N., Evans R., and Pitot M. A GIS-Based Land Use and Public Transport Accessibility Indexing Model. Australian Planner, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2007, pp. 30–37.
11. Nicholls S. Measuring the Accessibility and Equity of Public Parks: A Case Study Using GIS. Managing Leisure, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2001, pp. 201–219.
12. Kockelman K. M. Travel Behavior as Function of Accessibility, Land Use Mixing, and Land Use Balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 116–125.
13. Thouez J., Bodson P., and Joseph A. Some Methods for Measuring the Geographic Accessibility of Medical Services in Rural Regions. Medical Care, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1988, pp. 34–44.
14. Kwan M., and Weber J. Individual Accessibility Revisited: Implications for Geographical Analysis in the Twenty-First Century. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2003, pp. 341–353.
15. Geurs K., and Wee B. Accessibility Evaluation of Land-Use and Transport Strategies: Review and Research Direction. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 12, 2004, pp. 127–140.
16. Litman T. Measuring Transportation: Traffic, Mobility and Accessibility. ITE Journal, Vol. 10, 2003, pp. 28–32.
17. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2003.
18. Floods and Flash Floods: Introduction. Weather Forecast Office, National Weather Service, Des Moines, Iowa, 2012. http://www.crh.noaa.gov/dmx/?n=preparefloodintro. Accessed July 24, 2013.
19. Floods Cost Lives and Billions of Dollars in Property Damage Each Year Around the United States. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, Md., March 29, 2006. http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2006/s2601.htm. Accessed July 23, 2013.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nayel Urena Serulle
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 3250 Jeong H. Kim Engineering Building, College Park, MD 20742.
Cinzia Cirillo
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 3250 Jeong H. Kim Engineering Building, College Park, MD 20742.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 49

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Human-centric infrastructure resilience: Uncovering well-being risk di...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Analysis of Transportation Disruptions from Recent Flooding and Volcan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub