Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Temporal and Spatial Gap Acceptance for Minor Road at Uncontrolled Intersections in India

Abstract

Capacity analysis of unsignalized intersections is done primarily with gap acceptance principles. The vehicles on lower-priority approaches maneuver when a suitable gap is available in higher-priority conflicting streams. Although temporal gaps are widely used, some researchers advocate the use of spatial gaps. The focus of this study was on analyzing temporal and spatial gaps at four-legged, partially controlled intersections in India. Unlike in developed countries, unsignalized intersections in India are not controlled with stop and yield signs with explicit priorities. The priorities are mainly set by the situations drivers perceive. Field data were collected at three four-legged intersections with video cameras. Temporal and spatial critical gaps were estimated with Raff's, logit, lag, Ashworth's, and maximum likelihood methods. The values of temporal critical gap by different methods were found to vary between 3.0 and 3.9 s. The spatial critical gap values varied from 29 to 36 m. These values were smaller than the similar values reported in developed countries, indicating aggressiveness in Indian drivers. The insights from this study can be used for the capacity analysis of unsignalized intersections in India.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
2. Davis G. A., and Swenson T. Field Study of Gap Acceptance by Left-Turning Drivers. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1899, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 71–75.
3. Yan X., Radwan E., and Guo D. Effects of Major-Road Vehicle Speed and Driver Age and Gender on Left-Turn Gap Acceptance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2007, pp. 843–852.
4. Raff M. S., and Hart J. W. A Volume Warrant for Urban Stop Signs. Eno Foundation for Highway Traffic Control, Saugatuck, Conn., 1950.
5. Hewitt R. H. Measuring Critical Gap. Transportation Science, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1983, pp. 87–109.
6. Troutbeck R. J. Estimating the Critical Acceptance Gap from Traffic Movements. Physical Infrastructure Center Report. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 1992.
7. Brilon W., Koenig R., and Troutbeck R. J. Useful Estimation Procedures for Critical Gaps. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1999, pp. 161–186.
8. Tian Z., Vandehey M., Robinson B. W., Kittelson W., Kyte M., and Troutbeck R. Implementing the Maximum Likelihood Methodology to Measure a Driver's Critical Gap. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1999, pp. 187–197.
9. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001.
10. Pant P. D., and Balakrishnan P. Neural Network for Gap Acceptance at Stop-Controlled Intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 3, 1994, pp. 432–446.
11. Hamed M. M., Easa S. M., and Batayneh R. R. Disaggregate Gap-Acceptance Model for Unsignalized T-Intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 1, 1997, pp. 36–42.
12. Pollatschek M. A., Polus A., and Livneh M. A. Decision Model for Gap Acceptance and Capacity at Intersections. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 36, No. 7, 2002, pp. 649–663.
13. Rao T. V., and Rengaraju V. R. Probabilistic Model for Conflicts at Urban Uncontrolled Intersection. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 1, 1997, pp. 81–84.
14. Rao T. V., and Rengaraju V. R. Modeling Conflicts of Heterogeneous Traffic at Urban Uncontrolled Intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 1, 1998, pp. 23–34.
15. Ashalatha R., and Chandra S. Critical Gap Through Clearing Behavior of Drivers at Unsignalised Intersections. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2011, pp. 1427–1434.
16. Sangole J. P., Patil G. R., and Patare P. S. Modelling Gap Acceptance Behavior of Two-Wheelers at Uncontrolled Intersection Using Neuro-Fuzzy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, Vol. 20, 2011, pp. 927–941.
17. Patil G. R., Patare P. S., and Sangole J. P. Gap Acceptance Behavior of Two-Wheelers at Limited Priority Uncontrolled Intersections. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
18. Hewitt R. H. A Comparison Between Some Methods of Measuring Critical Gap. Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1985, pp. 13–22.
19. Fitzpatrick K. Gap Acceptance at Stop-Controlled Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1303, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 103–112.
20. Golias J., and Kanellaidis G. C. Estimation of Driver Behavior Model Parameters. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 116, No. 2, 1990, pp. 153–166.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gopal R. Patil
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India.
Digvijay S. Pawar
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 192

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 41

  1. Drivers’ Dilemma at High-Speed Unsignalized Intersections
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Impact of Fundamental Elements of Connected and Autonomous Technology ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Machine Learning-Based Gap Acceptance Model for Uncontrolled Intersect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Should I Stay or Should I Go? Cognitive Modeling of Left-Turn Gap Acce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  5. Effect of two-stage crossing of right-turning vehicles on capacity of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Implementing the Maximum Likelihood Method for Critical Gap Estimation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Categorization of gaps at mid-block median openings in heterogeneous t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Freight Traffic Impacts and Logistics Inefficiencies in India: Policy ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Examining Crossing Conflicts by Vehicle Type at Unsignalized T-Interse...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Modeling dynamic distribution of dilemma zone at signalized intersecti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. An impact of gap acceptance on road safety: A critical systematic revi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Assessment of service quality at unsignalized intersections using traf...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Analyzing the impact of time pressure on drivers’ safety by assessing ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Driving Behavior Model for Multi-Vehicle Interaction at Uncontrolled I...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Estimation of critical gaps and follow-up times at median uncontrolled...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Modelling and simulating head-on conflict-solving behaviour of motorcy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Comparative Appraisal of Critical Gap Estimation Techniques in the Con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Development of conflict severity index for safety evaluation of severe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Analyzing variations in spatial critical gaps at two-way stop controll...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Investigation of Crossing Conflicts by Vehicle Type at Unsignalized T-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Capacity estimation of unsignalized intersections under heterogeneous ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Post encroachment time threshold identification for right-turn related...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Drivers’ gap acceptance behaviours at intersections: A driving simulat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Investigating gap acceptance behavior at two-way stop-controlled inter...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Influence of major stream composition on critical gap at two-way stop-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Estimation of critical gap of U-turns at uncontrolled median openings
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. A comparative analysis of risk associated with eating, drinking and te...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Safety Assessment at Unsignalized Intersections Using Post-Encroachmen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Evaluation of Intersection Conflict Warning System: A Critical Gap Ana...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Modeling Duration of Lateral Shifts in Mixed Traffic Conditions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Critical gap estimation at two-way stop-controlled intersections based...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Response of major road drivers to aggressive maneuvering of the minor ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Minor-Street Vehicle Dilemma While Maneuvering at Unsignalized Interse...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Analysis of occupation time of vehicles at urban unsignalized intersec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Behavior of two-wheelers at limited priority uncontrolled T-intersecti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Critical gap estimation for pedestrians at uncontrolled mid-block cros...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Microscopic analysis of traffic behavior at unsignalized intersections...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Microscopic analysis of traffic behavior at unsignalized intersections...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Revised Raff’s Method for Estimating Critical Gaps
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Pedestrian temporal and spatial gap acceptance at mid-block street cro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Classification of Gaps at Uncontrolled Intersections and Midblock Cros...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub