Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2014

Evaluating Driver and Pedestrian Behaviors at Enhanced, Multilane, Midblock Pedestrian Crossings: Case Study in Portland, Oregon

Abstract

This study examined driver and pedestrian behaviors at two enhanced midblock pedestrian crossings in Portland, Oregon. One crossing was at a five-lane arterial with a posted speed of 35 mph and featured eight rectangular rapid flash beacon (RRFB) assemblies and a narrow median refuge. The other crossing was at a suburban arterial with a posted speed of 40 mph, four travel lanes, and a two-way left-turn lane. The crossing was enhanced with four RRFB assemblies and a median island with a Z-crossing, or Danish offset, designed to encourage pedestrians to face oncoming traffic before they completed the second stage of their crossing. Approximately 62 h of video was collected at the two locations. A total of 351 pedestrian crossings were analyzed for driver compliance (yielding) rates, pedestrian activation rates, pedestrian delay, and conflict avoidance maneuvers. The suburban arterial crossing was also evaluated to determine its effectiveness at diverting pedestrians to cross at the crossing instead of away from the crosswalk, as well as pedestrian compliance with the Z-crossing. The study found that average driver yield rates at both sites were slightly greater than 90% when the RRFB was activated, consistent with previous studies. RRFB actuation rates ranged from 83% to more than 90%. The results also showed that approximately 52% of all crossings at the marked crosswalk at the second location were made by diverted pedestrians and that the enhanced crossing captured about 82% of all crossings near the crosswalk. Finally, approximately 52% of the pedestrians who used the crosswalk followed the Z-crossing pattern through the median.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Traffic Safety Facts: 2010 Data, Pedestrians. Report DOT-HS-811-625. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2012.
2. Fitzpatrick K., Turner S. M., Brewer M., Carlson P. J., Ullman B., Trout N. D., Park E. S., Whitacre J., Lalani N., and Lord D. NCHRP Report 562/TCRP Report 112: Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006.
3. Zegeer C. V., Stewart J. R., Huang H. H., Lagerwey P. A., Feaganes J., and Campbell B. J. Safety Effects of Marked Versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Final Report and Recommended Guidelines. Publication FHWA-HRT-04-100. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005.
4. Hunter W. W., Srinivasan R., and Martell C. Evaluation of the Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon at a Pinellas Trail Crossing in Saint Petersburg Florida. Florida Department of Transportation, 2009.
5. Hunter-Zaworski K., and Mueller J. Evaluation of Alternative Pedestrian Traffic Control Devices. Publication FHWA-OR-RD-12-09. Oregon Department of Transportation and FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2012.
6. Ross J., Serpico D., and Lewis R. Assessment of Driver Yielding Rates Pre- and Post-RRFB Installation, Bend, Oregon. Publication FHWA-OR-RD-12-05. Oregon Department of Transportation and FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011.
7. Shurbutt J., Van Houten R., Turner S., and Huitema B. Analysis of Effects of LED Rectangular Rapid-Flash Beacons on Yielding to Pedestrians in Multilane Crosswalks. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2140, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 85–95.
8. Turner S., Fitzpatrick K., Brewer M., and Park E. S. Motorist Yielding to Pedestrians at Unsignalized Intersections: Findings from a National Study on Improving Pedestrian Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1982, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 1–12.
9. Van Houten R., LaPlante J., and Gustafson T. Evaluating Pedestrian Safety Improvements. Publication RC-1585. Michigan Department of Transportation, 2012.
10. Pulugurtha S. S., Vasudevan V., Nambisan S. S., and Dangeti M. R. Evaluating Effectiveness of Infrastructure-Based Countermeasures for Pedestrian Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2299, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 100–109.
11. Furst A. T. MUTCD—Interim Approval for Optional Use of Rectangular Rapid Flashing—Beacons (IA-11). FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008.
12. Sisiopiku V. P., and Akin D. Pedestrian Behaviors at and Perceptions Towards Various Pedestrian Facilities: An Examination Based on Observation and Survey Data. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, No. 6, 2003, pp. 249–274.
13. Draft Technical Memo #3: Existing Conditions and Needs Analysis for Ten Focus Areas. TriMet, Portland, Ore., 2011. http://trimet.org/pdfs/pednetwork/trimet-ped-network-technical-memo-3.pdf.
14. Van Houten R., Ellis R., and Marmolejo E. Stutter-Flash Light-Emitting-Diode Beacons to Increase Yielding to Pedestrians at Crosswalks. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2073, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 69–78.
15. Yellow Change and Red Clearance Intervals. In Signal Policy and Guidelines, Appendix K. Oregon Department of Transportation, 2009.
16. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.
17. Saunier N., Sayed T., and Ismail K. Large-Scale Automated Analysis of Vehicle Interactions and Collisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2147, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 42–50.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2014
Issue published: January 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nick Foster
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751.
Christopher M. Monsere
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751.
Katherine Carlos
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751.

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 137

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 15

  1. Analysis of the Effect of Providing Pedestrian Crossing Information at...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The implications of situation and route familiarity for driver-pedestr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Effectiveness of modified pedestrian crossing signs in an urban area
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Investigating relationships among perceptions of yielding, safety, and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Varying influences of the built environment on daily and hourly pedest...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Real-time estimation of pedestrian volume at button-activated midblock...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Factors explaining driver yielding behaviour towards pedestrians at co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Measuring Compliance of Driver Yielding at Enhanced Pedestrian Crossin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Pedestrian–vehicular interactions in a mixed street environment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Evaluating the influential factors for pushbutton utilization at signa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Prediction of drivers and pedestrians' behaviors at signalized mid-blo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Modeling Transitional States of Drivers Yielding Right-Of-Way to Pedes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Pedestrians/Bicyclists and Autonomous Vehicles: How Will They Communic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Simulation and Evaluation of Double Lane Traffic Running Rules with Un...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Multiobjective Evaluation of Midblock Crosswalks on Urban Streets Base...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub